Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 1,089 results (0.031 seconds)Executive Engineer Cd-Ii Vs. M/S J.K. Engineers
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1637/2014 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CD-II ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Madan, Adv. versus M/S J.K. ENGINEERS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 22.12.2014 IA No.25937/2014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P. 1637/2014 & IA No.25938/2014 (u/S151CPC for condonation of delay of 86 days in filing the petition) & IA No.25936/214 (u/S151CPC for stay) 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) accompanied by an application for condonation of delay. As per averments made in the application, there is a delay of 86 days.2. The challenge in the petition is made with regard to the three claims. The first claim is, in fact, a sub-claim, which bears the description: No.1.04. The other claim, which is challenged, is claim No.3, and the last claim, which is under challenge, is claim No.6.3. Insofar as s...
Tag this Judgment!Parveen Kumar Beniwal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8111/2014 PARVEEN KUMAR BENIWAL ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sunil K. Mittal, Mr Kshitij Mittal and Mr Anshul Mittal. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, St. Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms Sana Ansari for respondent. Mr Anjum Javed and Mr Devendra Kumar for respondent no.2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 06.08.2014 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Lt. Governor of Delhi whereby the petitioners appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereafter the Act) was rejected. The said appeal was preferred against an order dated 01.04.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Police (Licensing) revoking the petitioners arms license.2. The petitioners arms license was revoked by the Additional Commissioner of Police (Licensing) as ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-Xiii Vs. Hitesh Bansal
Court: Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA8012014 Date of decision:22. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIII ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Amir Aziz and Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus HITESH BANSAL Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue pertains to assessment year 2008-09 and impugns order dated 9th May, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. Learned counsel for the Revenue has relied upon decision of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Dalip Chand and Sons (2008) 301 ITR276(HP). In the said decision, it has been held that even prior to the amendment of Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) with effect from 1 st April, 2009, effect should be given to the said provision by aggregating the total cash payments towar...
Tag this Judgment!Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Capital Builders and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 12.2014 + OMP14932014 ANGLE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Versus M/S CAPITAL BUILDERS & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms Bina Gupta & Mr Abhay Anand, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr Atul Sharma & Mr Hilanka Chaudhury, Advs. For respondent no.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act). By this petition interim directions are sought vis-a-vis respondent no.1. Briefly, the interim directions which the petitioner seeks, pertain to the Development Rights Agreement dated 05.06.2012 (hereafter referred to as the DRA), executed as between the parties herein and a Full and Final Settlement agreement dated 29.10.2013, executed between the petitioner and respondent no.1, which is a proprietorship concern of, one, Sh. ...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Kumar Vs. Ranjit Singh, Mla and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:22. d December, 2014 % EL.PET. No.5/2014 + SURINDER KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. R.V.Naik, Adv. with Mr. S.K. Tandon, Adv. versus RANJIT SINGH, MLA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. U.B.N. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Umesh Sinha, Ms. Priyanka and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This election petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that election of respondent No.1 is null and void, thereby setting aside the election result dated 8th December, 2013 to the Assembly Constituency 68, Gokulpur Delhi (NCT Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as the "Gokulpur Constituency"), constituency reserved for schedule caste whereby respondent No.1 was elected and a declaration that the petitioner is the elected member from Gokulpur Constituency, who contested the said election dated 4th December, 2013 as an independent candidate.2. Brief facts of the presen...
Tag this Judgment!Deepti Abrol Vs. The Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9183/2014 and CM APPL. 20882/2014 Decided on:22. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: DEEPTI ABROL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/DOE with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Legal Assistant, Zone-1. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was working on the post of TGT with the respondents No.5 and 6/School from 18.04.1994 till 31.03.2008, praying inter alia that the respondents No.5 and 6/School be called upon to revise her pay scale and release the arrears of pay to her in terms of the Sixth Pay Commission till the date her resignation was accepted, alongwith interest and further, to pay her gratuity, travel allowance and bonus etc. from the date of her employment, till 25.03.2008.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while releasing the terminal...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Choudhary Vs. Union Public Service Commission
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:22. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 8944/2014 RAMESH CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. S. Janani with Mr. Deepak Goel and Mr. Sunando Raha, Advocates. versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate accepts notice. With consent of counsel, the matter was heard finally.2. The petitioner challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 5.11.2014 in OA42592013. The Original Application preferred by the present petitioner seeking a relief that the order debarring him from participating in Civil Services Examination for ten years issued by the UPSC, and cancelling his candidature for the Engineering Services Examination 2012, be set aside, was rejected.3. The brief facts are that the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!Vikram Bakshi and Anr Vs. Mc Donalds India Pvt Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IA Nos.6207/2014 in C.S.(OS) No.962/2014 Decided on : DECEMBER22 2014 VIKRAM BAKSHI AND ANR Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Mukul Rohatgi and Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rishi Sood, Advocate for P-1 and P-2. versus MC DONALDS INDIA PVT LTD AND ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr.Harish Salve and Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocates with Mr.Rahul P. Dave, Mr.Varij Sharma, Ms. Shaista Arora and Mr. Sumit Chopra, Advocates for D-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This order shall dispose of IA No.6207/2014 (u/Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC) by virtue of which the plaintiffs have prayed for an ad interim injunction against the arbitration proceedings initiated by defendant No.1 before the London Court of International Arbitration.2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the plaintiff No.1 is an Indian citizen and resides & carries on business within the jurisdiction of this court. The plaintiff No.2 is a company incorporated by th...
Tag this Judgment!Abhinav Kumar Vs. Ministry of Finance and Anr.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d December, 2014 % + WP(C) No.3634/2014 ABHINAV KUMAR Through: .. Appellant Mr. Awanish Kumar, Adv. Versus MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Sonia Sharma & Ms. Pallavi Shali, Advs. for UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), flags the issue of non availability of an Appraisal Counter for issuance of Export Certificate at the Indira Gandhi International (IGI) Airport, New Delhi, forcing the passengers to travel to the Custom House, Jhandewalan which is about 30 kms. away from the airport and thereby causing undue hardship to the commuters. The petition accordingly seeks a mandamus to the respondents Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue and the Central Board of Customs and Excise to have such an Appraisal Counter ...
Tag this Judgment!Virender Kumar Vs. The Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9218/2014 and CM APPL. 20948/2014 Decided on:22. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: VIRENDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Goel, Advocate versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 to R-3/DOE with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Legal Assistant, Zone-1. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was working on the post of TGT with the respondents No.5 and 6/School from 20.9.1988 till 16.8.2003 and from 1.4.2004 till 24.3.2006, praying inter alia that the respondents No.5 and 6/School be called upon to revise his pay scale and release the arrears of pay to him in terms of the Sixth Pay Commission till the date of termination, alongwith interest and further, to pay him gratuity, travel allowance and bonus etc. from the period of his employment.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while releasing the term...
Tag this Judgment!