Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 30 of about 1,333 results (0.014 seconds)Sh. Munni Lal and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4650/2012 & CM No.8487/2014 .... Petitioners SH. MUNNI LAL AND ANR versus ..... Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B Ms Shobhana Takiar for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file a rejoinder affidavit.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8137/2014 and CM APPL. 18974/2014 Decided on:25. 11.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF : MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aviral Dhirendra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 issued by the Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.2/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that on failure to show cause, his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.3/FCI , would be cancelled and he would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that o...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Suraj Bajaj Vs. Sh. Swadesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.539/2012 & C.M.No.18708/2012 (Stay) 25th November, 2014 % SH. SURAJ BAJAJ Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Amit Sethi with Mr.Sachin Aneja, Advocates. VERSUS SH. SWADESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ...... Respondent Mr.Jayant K.Sud with Mr.Bonita Singh and Mr.Chirag Khurana, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 31.7.2012 by which the ARC has dismissed the leave to defend application and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to one room i.e garage in the ground floor of the property bearing no.4/29, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the evi...
Tag this Judgment!Dina Nath Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 25, 2014 + W.P.(C) Nos. 7015, 7048, 7129, 7185 and 7208 of 2013 DINA NATH ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7015/2013 NARESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7048/2013 KAMLA DEVI ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7129/2013 BHARAT PASWAN ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7185/2013 VED PRAKASH ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7208/2013 Represented by: Mr.Anukul Chandra Pradhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Baid and Mr. Rahul Baid, Advocates. Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Ms. Yoothica Pallavi and Ms. Namrata Mukim, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide these petitions, the petitioners seek to set aside the award dated 27.07.2013 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby a sum of Rs.50,000/- each was granted in favour of the petitioners/workman in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.2. Issue in these petitions...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Rai and Ors Vs. State (Delhi Admn) and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4509/2014 AMIT RAI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anwar Jamal, Advocate versus STATE (DELHI ADMN) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Anita, PS Uttam Nagar Mr. Pravin Kr. Pachori, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 15435/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4509/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.394/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Uttam Nagar on 21.07.2013, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Pravin Kumar Pachori, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant is present in person. She is al...
Tag this Judgment!Shailendra Swarup Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
$~* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #321 + CRL.A. No.940 of 2008 SHAILENDRA SWARUP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Ms. Aparajia Swarup and Mr. K.K. Patra, Advocates. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2511.2014 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 2nd July 2008 by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing the Appeal No.1268 of 2004 filed against Adjudication Order (AO) No.SDE (SKD) III/264/2004 dated 3rd November 2004 passed by the Special Director, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Government of India, inter alia holding the Appellant to be in contravention of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with Section 68 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and levying a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs on the Appellant.2. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are tha...
Tag this Judgment!Sh Mukand Swarup Vs. Smt Manisha Swarup
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 25, 2014 + FAO4212013 & C.M.No.17985/2013 SH MUKAND SWARUP Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jatin Sehgal & Mr. Harish Malik, Advocates versus SMT MANISHA SWARUP Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ajay Kumar Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % Impugned judgment of 30th September, 2013 grants permanent custody of children Master Shubham, aged about eleven years and Kumari Radhika, aged about fourteen years to respondent-wife on application under Section 25 of The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The facts of this case find mention in the impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. It would suffice to note that parties got married on 31st October, 1998 and their marriage ran into rough weather resulting in proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and filing of application under this enactment. Whether it would be in the welfare and interest of children to handover...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Karan Yadav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 25, 2014 + CRL.A. 1145/2011 JAI KARAN YADAV Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Narinder Sharma, Advocate with Mr.J.P.Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Satish Kumar, PS Bhalsava Dairy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Kaushalya Yadav (deceased) was the wife of the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute said fact. Kaushalya Yadav was injured in her matrimonial house on July 14, 2010 at 10:30 PM and appellant was present in the house is a fact not disputed by the appellant. The fact that the appellant was present in his house when his wife was injured is proved by the MLC Ex.PW-5/A of Kaushalya Yadav which records that at 12:05 i.e. soon after midnight on July 15, 2010 the appellant took his wife in an injured condition to Babu Jagjivan Ram Hospital where she was de...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Mohd. Abid Vs. Smt. Kausar Parveen
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1271/2013 & CM No.18920/13 (stay) 25th November, 2014 % SH. MOHD. ABID Through: ......Petitioner Mr. R.M Bagai, Mr. Yasin and Ms. Damini Khurana, Advocates. VERSUS SMT. KAUSAR PARVEEN Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Farahim Khan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/tenant impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Additional Rent Controller dated 22.11.2012 and the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dated 8.10.2013; by which the courts below have decreed the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlady under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) on account of non-payment of rent.2. At the outset, I must note that the present/ subject eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act was a se...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: November 25, 2014 + CRL.A. 1443/2013 SHANKAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishna Kumar R.S., Mr.Raj Kumar Prasad, Mr.Naved, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with SI Vandana, PS Kirti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Shankar Singh challenges the judgment dated September 06, 2013 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated September 07, 2013 directing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a sum of `50,000/- and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. It was also made clear that life meant the remainder of the convicts natural life. Govt. of NCT was directed to pay an appropriate compensation to the victim, 75% of which amount was to be deposited in the fixed term dep...
Tag this Judgment!