Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 29 of about 1,333 results (0.025 seconds)Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November 2014 Decision on:25. h November 2014 CRL.A. No.147 of 2009 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sharat Kapoor, Ms. Shilpa Dewan and Mr. Sunny Verma, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP for State. Mr. D.S. Kohli with Mr. Aashneet Singh Anand, Advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2511.2014 1. This appeal by the Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) is against the impugned judgment dated 6th August 2008 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) in Complaint Case No.199 of 2003 acquitting the Respondent No.2 of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act). The complaint 2. In its complaint before the learned MM, SAIL stated that M/s. Capital Industries, Respondent No.3 partnership firm, of which Mr. Dinesh Vij, (Respondent No.2 herein) and Mr. Pra...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-Vi Vs. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~20 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. h November, 2014 + ITA1152014 & 119/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI Through ..... Appellant Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel versus TAIKISHA ENGINEERING INDIA LTD Through ..... Respondent Mr. K.R.Manjani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) These two appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short) relate to assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10.2. The issue raised by the Revenue in these appeals pertains to Section 14A of the Act and Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (Rules for short) and disallowance of expenditure relating to exempt income.3. For the assessment year 2008-09, the respondent assessee had filed return declaring total taxable income of Rs.31,14,68,297/- and exempt income of Rs.2,46,81,747/-. The assessee had voluntarily disallowed expenditure of Rs.1,15,000/- under Section ...
Tag this Judgment!Sakshi Rawal and Ors. Vs. Pankaj Rawal
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: November 25, 2014 I.P.A. No.1/2014 & I.A. No.302/2014 SAKSHI RAWAL & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. versus PANKAJ RAWAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.Mohit Auluck, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners filed the present petition under Sections 18 and 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act for grant of maintenance.2. Petitioner No.1 is the wife of the respondent while petitioners No.2 and 3 are their daughters, both of them are minor. It is stated by the petitioner No.1 that the petitioners do not have their individual source of income and it is difficult for them to survive.3. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner No.1 was forced to leave the matrimonial home alongwith petitioners No.2 and 3 after facing atrocities. On various occasions she was taunted for not bringing sufficient dowry and for belonging to lower background. However, s...
Tag this Judgment!Swarup Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4632/2012 & CM No.8488/2014 SWARUP SINGH .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B Ms Shobhana Takiar for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file a rejoinder affidavit.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the e...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Ram Kumar, Ex. Driver
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 11.2014 + LPA3582014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. versus SHRI RAM KUMAR, EX. DRIVER ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal is against an order of the learned Single Judge dated 12.11.2013, whereby the award dated 23.9.2003 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.87/1993 was upheld; the latter had directed grant of full backwages to the respondent/workman. The appellant contends that there could be no such entitlement for the period the workman was out of service.2. The facts of the case are that on the basis of a newspaper report regarding misbehaviour with a college going female student by a DTC driver and a conductor, the appellant had initiated action against the respondent/driver and the conductor of the bus. These two were identified on the bas...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Prakash Gulia Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:25thNovember, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 716/2014 HARI PRAKASH GULIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Singh & Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. Mr. P.K. Malik, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against order dated 25.09.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (Central), Delhi whereby the revision petition was dismissed.2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are that respondent No.2 filed a complaint on the allegations, inter alia, that he is running business of selling lottery ticket on partnership basis at Stall No.1, U.P. Roadways Bus Stand, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi 110006 for the last more than 15 years. The said stal...
Tag this Judgment!Cwick (Import Consolidations) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Agriculture Researc ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 2094/2014 & CM No.4362/2014 CWICK (IMPORT CONSOLIDATIONS) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Jagjit Singh. For the Respondent : Mr Piyush Sharma. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the order dated 03.03.2014 passed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) inter alia directing recovery of a sum of `5,74,249/from the petitioner and blacklisting the petitioner from any future dealings with the respondent.2. The limited controversy to be addressed is whether, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the order of blacklisting the petitioner is unreasonable.3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary for the purpose of considering the dispute are as under:4. The petit...
Tag this Judgment!Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Santosh Kumari and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 80/2013 FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Ms.Suman Bagga with Mr.Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate versus SANTOSH KUMARI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit K.Pandey, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 6th November, 2012.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 17th October, 2010, number of persons had gone to watch the burning of effigies of Ravan on the Dussehra festival. They watched the mela at Nehru Place and sat in the Champion vehicle. When the vehicle reached Crown Plaza Hotel Today, it overturned due to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle. One of the occupants, namely, Jagdish Lal expired. Three others were injured. Hence, four claim petitions were filed. I am dealing with the portion of the...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. 11.2014 Pronounced on :25. 11.2014 % + CRL.A. 23/2006 MANOJ Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The Appellant Manoj has been convicted by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.33/2002 in FIR No.361/2002 under Sections 376/452/506/342/323 IPC, PS Hauz Khas for committing the offence punishable under Sections 451/342/376/506 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for one year with fine of Rs.500 and in default to undergo SI for one week for committing the offence punishable under Section 451 IPC, to undergo RI for six month for committing the offence punishable under Section 342 IPC, to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs.5000/- and in default to undergo SI for six months for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and to undergo RI for two...
Tag this Judgment!Aabhas Arora Vs. the State and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5294/2014 AABHAS ARORA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Shiv Pande and Mr. Vadudhara Nagrath, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with HC Jagdish Singh PS Adarsh Nagar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 18065/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5294/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18064/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.374/2014 registered under Sections 287/337 IPC at Police Station Adarsh Nagar on 4th June, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/res...
Tag this Judgment!