Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Swarup Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4632/2012 & CM No.8488/2014 SWARUP SINGH .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B Ms Shobhana Takiar for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file a rejoinder affidavit.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the e...
Tag this Judgment!Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Santosh Kumari and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 80/2013 FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Ms.Suman Bagga with Mr.Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate versus SANTOSH KUMARI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit K.Pandey, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 6th November, 2012.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 17th October, 2010, number of persons had gone to watch the burning of effigies of Ravan on the Dussehra festival. They watched the mela at Nehru Place and sat in the Champion vehicle. When the vehicle reached Crown Plaza Hotel Today, it overturned due to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle. One of the occupants, namely, Jagdish Lal expired. Three others were injured. Hence, four claim petitions were filed. I am dealing with the portion of the...
Tag this Judgment!Cwick (Import Consolidations) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Agriculture Researc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 2094/2014 & CM No.4362/2014 CWICK (IMPORT CONSOLIDATIONS) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Jagjit Singh. For the Respondent : Mr Piyush Sharma. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the order dated 03.03.2014 passed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) inter alia directing recovery of a sum of `5,74,249/from the petitioner and blacklisting the petitioner from any future dealings with the respondent.2. The limited controversy to be addressed is whether, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the order of blacklisting the petitioner is unreasonable.3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary for the purpose of considering the dispute are as under:4. The petit...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Prakash Gulia Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:25thNovember, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 716/2014 HARI PRAKASH GULIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Singh & Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. Mr. P.K. Malik, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against order dated 25.09.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (Central), Delhi whereby the revision petition was dismissed.2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are that respondent No.2 filed a complaint on the allegations, inter alia, that he is running business of selling lottery ticket on partnership basis at Stall No.1, U.P. Roadways Bus Stand, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi 110006 for the last more than 15 years. The said stal...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Munni Lal and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4650/2012 & CM No.8487/2014 .... Petitioners SH. MUNNI LAL AND ANR versus ..... Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rakesh Kumar Garg and Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B Ms Shobhana Takiar for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The affidavit handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file a rejoinder affidavit.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Ram Kumar, Ex. Driver
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 11.2014 + LPA3582014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Arati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. versus SHRI RAM KUMAR, EX. DRIVER ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal is against an order of the learned Single Judge dated 12.11.2013, whereby the award dated 23.9.2003 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.87/1993 was upheld; the latter had directed grant of full backwages to the respondent/workman. The appellant contends that there could be no such entitlement for the period the workman was out of service.2. The facts of the case are that on the basis of a newspaper report regarding misbehaviour with a college going female student by a DTC driver and a conductor, the appellant had initiated action against the respondent/driver and the conductor of the bus. These two were identified on the bas...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Rai and Ors Vs. State (Delhi Admn) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4509/2014 AMIT RAI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anwar Jamal, Advocate versus STATE (DELHI ADMN) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Anita, PS Uttam Nagar Mr. Pravin Kr. Pachori, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 15435/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4509/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.394/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Uttam Nagar on 21.07.2013, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Pravin Kumar Pachori, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant is present in person. She is al...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Karan Yadav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 25, 2014 + CRL.A. 1145/2011 JAI KARAN YADAV Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Narinder Sharma, Advocate with Mr.J.P.Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Satish Kumar, PS Bhalsava Dairy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Kaushalya Yadav (deceased) was the wife of the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant does not dispute said fact. Kaushalya Yadav was injured in her matrimonial house on July 14, 2010 at 10:30 PM and appellant was present in the house is a fact not disputed by the appellant. The fact that the appellant was present in his house when his wife was injured is proved by the MLC Ex.PW-5/A of Kaushalya Yadav which records that at 12:05 i.e. soon after midnight on July 15, 2010 the appellant took his wife in an injured condition to Babu Jagjivan Ram Hospital where she was de...
Tag this Judgment!Sh Mukand Swarup Vs. Smt Manisha Swarup
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 25, 2014 + FAO4212013 & C.M.No.17985/2013 SH MUKAND SWARUP Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jatin Sehgal & Mr. Harish Malik, Advocates versus SMT MANISHA SWARUP Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ajay Kumar Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % Impugned judgment of 30th September, 2013 grants permanent custody of children Master Shubham, aged about eleven years and Kumari Radhika, aged about fourteen years to respondent-wife on application under Section 25 of The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The facts of this case find mention in the impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. It would suffice to note that parties got married on 31st October, 1998 and their marriage ran into rough weather resulting in proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and filing of application under this enactment. Whether it would be in the welfare and interest of children to handover...
Tag this Judgment!Dina Nath Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 25, 2014 + W.P.(C) Nos. 7015, 7048, 7129, 7185 and 7208 of 2013 DINA NATH ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7015/2013 NARESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7048/2013 KAMLA DEVI ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7129/2013 BHARAT PASWAN ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7185/2013 VED PRAKASH ..... Petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7208/2013 Represented by: Mr.Anukul Chandra Pradhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Baid and Mr. Rahul Baid, Advocates. Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Ms. Yoothica Pallavi and Ms. Namrata Mukim, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide these petitions, the petitioners seek to set aside the award dated 27.07.2013 passed by the learned Tribunal, whereby a sum of Rs.50,000/- each was granted in favour of the petitioners/workman in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.2. Issue in these petitions...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »