Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Manoj Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8137/2014 and CM APPL. 18974/2014 Decided on:25. 11.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF : MANOJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aviral Dhirendra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 issued by the Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.2/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that on failure to show cause, his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.3/FCI , would be cancelled and he would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that o...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Suraj Bajaj Vs. Sh. Swadesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.539/2012 & C.M.No.18708/2012 (Stay) 25th November, 2014 % SH. SURAJ BAJAJ Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Amit Sethi with Mr.Sachin Aneja, Advocates. VERSUS SH. SWADESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ...... Respondent Mr.Jayant K.Sud with Mr.Bonita Singh and Mr.Chirag Khurana, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 31.7.2012 by which the ARC has dismissed the leave to defend application and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to one room i.e garage in the ground floor of the property bearing no.4/29, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the evi...
Tag this Judgment!Shailendra Swarup Vs. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #321 + CRL.A. No.940 of 2008 SHAILENDRA SWARUP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Ms. Aparajia Swarup and Mr. K.K. Patra, Advocates. versus SPECIAL DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2511.2014 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 2nd July 2008 by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing the Appeal No.1268 of 2004 filed against Adjudication Order (AO) No.SDE (SKD) III/264/2004 dated 3rd November 2004 passed by the Special Director, Enforcement Directorate (ED), Government of India, inter alia holding the Appellant to be in contravention of Sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with Section 68 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) and levying a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs on the Appellant.2. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are tha...
Tag this Judgment!VirgIn Enterprises Ltd. and Anr. Vs. VirgIn Paradise Airlines Training ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. d NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :25. h NOVEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 734/2013 VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LTD. & ANR. Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Amitabha Sen, Advocate with Ms.Malyashree Sridharan & Mr.Nihit Nagpal, Advocates. VERSUS VIRGIN PARADISE AIRLINES TRAINING PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiffs have instituted the present suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from infringing their trademark and passing off their services as that of his. Briefly stated, the facts set up in the plaint are as under :2. The plaintiff No.1 Virgin Enterprises Limited is a member of the Virgin Group of Companies. It was originally established by Sir Richard Branson in 1970. It is a company incorporated in England and Wales and is a member of the Group of Companies collectively known as the Virgin Group of Companies. Plaintiff No.2 Virgin Mobile India Pvt. Ltd. having i...
Tag this Judgment!Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited Vs. Fujitshu India Private Limited a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 % + OMP No.492/2013 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED ..... Petitioner Versus FUJITSHU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr. S. Dubey, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Nayak, Mr. Khalid Arshad, Mr. Abhishek Bansal and Mr. Ishwer Upneja, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. The challenge by way of the present petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) is to the award dated 17.12.2002. 1.1 Before I proceed further, it may be relevant to note, at the very outset that the disputes between the parties, essentially, revolved around a settlement dated 13.4.2006, entered into between the parties. While, the petitioner here...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Vs. Mool Chand and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~A-12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November 2014. % + MAC.APP. 1242/2012 RAMESH Through ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Srivastava, Advocate. versus MOOL CHAND & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Kirti Sethi, Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER2511.2014 % 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks enhancement of compensation as awarded by the award dated 13.02.2012.2. The brief facts which led to the filing of the claim petition and the present appeal are that on 19.07.2004, the appellant was standing on a bus stop at Ashram. He was hit by a tractor said to be driven by respondent No.1 in a rash and negligent manner and he suffered injuries.3. Based on the evidence on record the tribunal concluded that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1.4. On compensation, the tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.3,05,597/- as follows:- On account of medical expenses Loss...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Mohd. Abid Vs. Smt. Kausar Parveen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1271/2013 & CM No.18920/13 (stay) 25th November, 2014 % SH. MOHD. ABID Through: ......Petitioner Mr. R.M Bagai, Mr. Yasin and Ms. Damini Khurana, Advocates. VERSUS SMT. KAUSAR PARVEEN Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Farahim Khan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/tenant impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Additional Rent Controller dated 22.11.2012 and the Additional Rent Control Tribunal dated 8.10.2013; by which the courts below have decreed the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlady under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) on account of non-payment of rent.2. At the outset, I must note that the present/ subject eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(a) of the DRC Act was a se...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: November 25, 2014 + CRL.A. 1443/2013 SHANKAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishna Kumar R.S., Mr.Raj Kumar Prasad, Mr.Naved, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with SI Vandana, PS Kirti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Shankar Singh challenges the judgment dated September 06, 2013 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated September 07, 2013 directing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a sum of `50,000/- and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. It was also made clear that life meant the remainder of the convicts natural life. Govt. of NCT was directed to pay an appropriate compensation to the victim, 75% of which amount was to be deposited in the fixed term dep...
Tag this Judgment!Dtc Vs. Rattan Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 25, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.3635/2011 DTC Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate. Versus RATTAN LAL Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.G.S.Charya, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is directed against the award dated 20.08.2010 passed by the learned Labour Court in ID No.347/2004, whereby while setting aside the order of dismissal, the learned Tribunal awarded penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect and the workman was reinstated with continuity of service, but without back wages.2. As per the statement of claim filed by the respondent/workman, it is stated that he had been working with the petitioner Management on the post of Conductor and never gave a chance to complaint. The Management was satisfied with his work. During the period from 30.01.2003 to 10.07.2003, his wife was ill and he could not resume his duty, howeve...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: November 25, 2014 + CRL.A. 1443/2013 SHANKAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishna Kumar R.S., Mr.Raj Kumar Prasad, Mr.Naved, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with SI Vandana, PS Kirti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Shankar Singh challenges the judgment dated September 06, 2013 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated September 07, 2013 directing him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a sum of `50,000/- and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. It was also made clear that life meant the remainder of the convicts natural life. Govt. of NCT was directed to pay an appropriate compensation to the victim, 75% of which amount was to be deposited in the fixed term dep...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »