Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surender @ Jeetu Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2014 Delivered on:26. h November, 2014 CRL.A. No.664 of 2008 DEEPAK @ D.K. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate with Appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Isha Khanna, APP WITH CRL.A. No.665 of 2008 KAPIL @ DAYAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.N. Sharma, Advocate with Appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. AND CRL.A. No.806 of 2008 SURENDER @ JEETU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mukul Sharma with Mr. Ramesh K. Sharma, Advocate with Appellant in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2611.2014 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 23rd July 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (SJ) in SC No.83 of 2006 holding the Appellants guilty of the offenc...
Jasmeet Kaur Talwar and Anr. Vs. Gurjit Singh Talwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:26. h November, 2014 + I.P.A. No.67/ 2013 JASMEET KAUR TALWAR AND ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate and Ms. Anupama, Advocate. versus GURJIT SINGH TALWAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Y.P. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate and Ms. Jyoti Kataria, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL I.A. No.11050/ 2014 (u/s. 20 (3) of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 r/w Section 151 CPC) in I.P.A. No.67/ 2013 1. This suit (in the form of a Petition as an indigent person) has been filed by the two Petitioners; Petitioner No.1 is the wife and Petitioner No.2 is the daughter of the Respondent.2. In the main petition, maintenance on account of Respondents cruelty and neglect to maintain the Petitioners has been claimed. It is averred that Petitioner No.1 was married to the Respondent on 31.10.1982. A daughter i.e. Petitioner No.2 and a son were born to Petitioner No.1 from the loins...
Manoj Gupta and Ors Vs. State of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5385/2014 MANOJ GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Hitender Sakkarwal & Mr. Sindhu, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Mandawali Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 18358/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5385/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.114/2010 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Mandawali on 17.03.2010, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties 2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for the second respondent/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. ...
Jitender Kumar Pahwa Vs. Usha Kiran Pahwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 26, 2014 + FAO No.295/2002 JITENDER KUMAR PAHWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Faisal Zafar, Advocate with petitioner-in-person versus USHA KIRAN PAHWA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R.Chawla, Advocate with respondent-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Appellant-husband is aggrieved by impugned judgment of 4th April, 2002 vide which appellants petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion has been dismissed. The factual background of this case already stands noted in impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. Suffice it would be to note that the parties were married on 8 th October, 1990 and as per appellant, respondent-wife had deserted him in July, 1992. The appellants petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights filed in July, 1992 was withdrawn in December, 1995 as the efforts for reconciliation of matrimonial dispute betw...
Amit Kumar and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5379/2014 ..... Petitioners AMIT KUMAR & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar & Mr. Dalip Singh, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. ASI Jaswant Singh, P.S. CWC, Nanakpura. Mr. Gulab Singh & Mr. Ratan Solanki, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 18343/2014 (exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5379/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.51/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi on 03.04.2013 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State and respondent No.2/complainant enter appearance and accept notice. The compla...
Shri C.P.Sehgal Vs. Smt. Archana Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. No.501/2011 & RC. Rev. No.505/2011 26th November , 2014 % RC.Rev. No.501/2011 SHRI C.P.SEHGAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. ARCHANA GUPTA ...... Respondent Through: Mr. S.D.Dixit, Advocate. Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate. RC.Rev. No.505/2011 SHRI C.P.SEHGAL VERSUS SMT. ARCHANA GUPTA ...... Respondent Through: Mr. S.D.Dixit, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RC.Rev. No.501/2011 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) impugning the judgment of the Rent Controller dated 29.10.2011 by which the Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the ...
Jitender Kumar Pahwa Vs. Usha Kiran Pahwa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 26, 2014 + FAO No.295/2002 JITENDER KUMAR PAHWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Faisal Zafar, Advocate with petitioner-in-person versus USHA KIRAN PAHWA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R.Chawla, Advocate with respondent-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Appellant-husband is aggrieved by impugned judgment of 4th April, 2002 vide which appellants petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion has been dismissed. The factual background of this case already stands noted in impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. Suffice it would be to note that the parties were married on 8 th October, 1990 and as per appellant, respondent-wife had deserted him in July, 1992. The appellants petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights filed in July, 1992 was withdrawn in December, 1995 as the efforts for reconciliation of matrimonial dispute betw...
Sri Guru Teg Bahadur Public School Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.890/2011 SRI GURU TEG BAHADUR PUBLIC SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Shukla, Mr. Shubham Saxena and Ms.Anamika Saraff, Advocates. Versus EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Balraj Dewan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner School seeks setting aside of the order dated 13.10.2010 passed by the EPF Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, and the order dated 19.09.2005 passed by the respondent No.2/Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (for short Commissioner), whereby the petitioner Establishment was directed to make compliance under all the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short the EPF Act), w.e.f. 01.02.2005, subject to the right of the Department to shift back the date of coverage if subsequently ...
Sh.S.Ravinder Pal Singh Vs. Sh.Kewal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.573/2012 & C.M.No.20161/2012 (Stay) 26th November, 2014 % SH.S.RAVINDER PAL SINGH Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Niraj Jha, Advocate. VERSUS SH.KEWAL Through: ...... Respondent Mr.Nitin Sharma with Mr.Vineet Gandhi, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. (Yes) VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/tenant impugns the order of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 01.10.2012 by which the Additional Rent Controller (RC) has dismissed the leave to defend application on account of the same being barred by time as it is stated to have been filed beyond the statutory period of 15 days prescribed for filing of the leave to defend application under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 25B of the Act and the prescribed summons in the schedule and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition. It is not d...
Manoj Gupta and ors Vs. State of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2014
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5385/2014 MANOJ GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Hitender Sakkarwal & Mr. Sindhu, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Mandawali Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 18358/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5385/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.114/2010 registered under Section 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Mandawali on 17.03.2010, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties 2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for the second respondent/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »