Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 132 of about 1,333 results (0.021 seconds)Pranay Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4876/2014 and CM No.9734/2014 ... Petitioner PRANAY MEHTA versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N. S. Vasisht, Mr M.P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Akshay Makhija with Mr Rohitendra Deb for R-1 Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Pawan Mathur for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (herei...
Tag this Judgment!VipIn Malik Vs. the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 2213/2013 & CM41992013 VIPIN MALIK ..... Petitioner versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr V. P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms Yukti Gupta. For the Respondent : Mr J.S. Bakshi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns the decision of the Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (hereinafter referred to as ICAI) remanding the matter relating to petitioners alleged professional misconduct to the disciplinary committee, for undertaking further enquiry with regard to specific issues relating to alleged misconduct on the part of the petitioner. The said specific issues were communicated to the petitioner by letter dated 08.03.2013. Accordingly, the petitioner has prayed for filing/quashing the said disciplinary proceedings registered as Case No.25/CA (16)...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 10.2014 Pronounced on:03. 11.2014 + CRL.A.1271/2013 AJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant Versus STATE + ..... Respondent CRL.A.1272/2013, CRL.M.B.2019/2013 TRILOKI CHAND ..... Appellant Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Sh. R.M. Tufail with Sh. Farooq Chaudhary and Sh. Vishal Raj Sahijpal, Advocates, for the appellants in both the appeals. Sh. Varun Goswami, APP on behalf of the State with Inspector Rajbir Singh, PS S.P. Badli, in both appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These appeals are directed against a common judgment and order on the point of sentence of the learned ASJ Rohini in S.C. No.399/2007. The appellants (hereafter referred to by their names, i.e. Ajay and Triloki) were convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 302/307 IPC read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, ("IPC") and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for CRL...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Vs. State Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 30, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.1236/2014 DEEPAK Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Anil Hooda, Advocate. versus STATE NCT DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Devender Kumar and Inspector Samwar Mal, PS Mundka. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Deepak assails the judgment dated August 02, 2014 convicting him for the offence of murder of his wife Rekha on August 12, 2011 by pouring kerosene oil and setting her on fire after lighting a matchstick and the order on sentence dated August 12, 2014 whereby he has been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for one month. Deepak is also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and has been directed to undergo Rigoro...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Singh Dhingra Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4679/2014 ... Petitioner PREM SINGH DHINGRA versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Smita Maan and Mr Vishal Maan For the Respondents : Mr Ajay Digpaul with Mr Kunal Punj for R-1&2 Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Arjun Pant for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which ...
Tag this Judgment!Niranjana Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4849/2014 ... Petitioner NIRANJANA SINGH versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S Vasisht, Mr M.P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Akshay Makhija with Mr Rohitendra Deb for R-1 Mr Dhanesh Relan for DDA Mr Siddharth Panda for the L&B and LAC. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 189...
Tag this Judgment!Blb Ltd. Vs. the Calcutta Stock Exchange
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:3. d November, 2014 % + O.A. No.11/2013 in CS(OS) No.272/2004 BLB LTD. Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.P.Nagesh and Mr.A.M.Mishra, Advs. versus THE CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE ..... Defendant Through Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.S.Bhowmick, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned Chamber Appeal has been filed by the defendant/appellant under Rule 4 read with Chapter II of Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967 against the order dated 6th December, 2012 passed by the Joint Registrar to the extent of order passed in I.A. No.6903/2012 (under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC).2. Some relevant facts about the progress of the suit are necessary for the disposal of the present appeal. The same are that the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.11,89,86,521/- against the defendant. The suit was filed on 16th March, 2004. The admission/denial of the documents was co...
Tag this Judgment!Radhey Shyam Aggarwal Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8993/2011 RADHEY SHYAM AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through Dr. Shyamlha Pappu, Senior Advocate with Mr. R. Krishnamorthi, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Arora, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocate Reserved on :19. h September, 2014 Date of Decision :03. d November, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to convert property No.A-22, Vishal Enclave, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the said property') into freehold without charging any restoration charges. Petitioner also challenges cancellation of Lease Deed dated 11th September, 1979 on account of misuse and seeks its restoration.2. Dr. Shyamlha Pappu, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that cancellation of the lease was bad in law as it had been done without issuing any show cause no...
Tag this Judgment!Gagan Chopra Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
$~27(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5326/2014 & CM105902014 GAGAN CHOPRA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Anand Yadav For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Siddharth Panda for R-2 & 3/ L&B and LAC. Mr Dhanesh Relan for R-4/DDA. Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla with Mr B. Singh for R-1/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of whic...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7552/2014 Decided on 03.11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : MUKESH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 and the order dated 27.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.3/Regional Director (NR) of the Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AGII) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI was cancelled and he was debarred for a period of three years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up at the stage of admission for final di...
Tag this Judgment!