Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 128 of about 1,333 results (0.021 seconds)Sh. Tarjeet Singh Walia Vs. Smt. Nirmala Devi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.461/2013 & C.M.No.19778/2013 (Stay) 05th November, 2014 % SH. TARJEET SINGH WALIA Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sandeep Sharma and Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocates. VERSUS SMT. NIRMALA DEVI Through: ...... Respondent Mr.Shiv Charan Garg with Mr.Vinay Sharma and Mr.Imran Khan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 30.9.2013 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlady under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to one shop on the ground floor of property bearing no.WZ-854, Rani Bagh, Delhi-34.2. B...
Tag this Judgment!Shri M L Sharma Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2014 + CM(M) 1311/2013 & C.M.No.19474/2013 SHRI M L SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Sukhda Dhamija & Mr. S.K. Rout, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) Petitioner has sought direction to the Land Acquisition Collector to forward petitioners application under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC for substitution of Mr. M.L. Sharma as legal heir of deceased Smt. Raj Kumari Sharma. Vide impugned order of 3rd June, 2013, Reference Court has held that no cogent proof has been placed on record by petitioner to show that he had ever filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC before the Land Acquisition Collector and no such application lies before the Land Acquisition Collector. During the course of hearing of this petition, it was submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that Smt. Raj Kumari Sharma had died on...
Tag this Judgment!Geeta Kumar Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:05. 11.2014 + LPA7202014 GEETA KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Kumar Gupta, and Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocates versus DELHI JAL BOARD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Suresh Tripathi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) The Challenge in the present appeal is to the order dated 25th August 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby a direction was given to the appellant/petitioner to file an application seeking impleadment of legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Lubhaya in the writ petition preferred by her. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the grievance raised by the appellant in the present appeal is that the appellant has filed sufficient documents to prove her occupation on the premises in question and also made an averment in the petition that the other legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Lubhaya had been harassing her and ref...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Kumar Sharma Vs. Ram Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2014 + RSA3192014 NARENDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.R.Jain, Mr. Neeraj Jain & Mr. Bhupesh Kumar, Advocates versus RAM KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.L. Bajaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) Caveat No.965/2014 (u/S148A CPC) Respondent is represented through counsel. Caveat is discharged. RSA3192014 & C.M.No.18024/2014 (for stay) Respondents suit for possession of suit property stands decreed by Trial Court and is affirmed by the First Appellate Court. The concurrent findings returned by both the courts below are that the Will in question clearly demarcates the respective portions of the parties. The factual matrix of this case already stands noted in the impugned judgment and needs no reproduction. At the hearing of this appeal, it was contended by learned counsel for appellant that the requisite court fee has not been paid by respondent RSA3192014 P...
Tag this Judgment!islam Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2014 + CRL.A. 593/2012 ISLAM Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Afhaq Ahmed Police Station Adarsh Nagar & + CRL.A. 703/2012 MANOJ KUMAR & ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Naveen Gaur, Mr. Vijay Gaur and Mr. Raj Jaiswal, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Afhaq Ahmed Police Station Adarsh Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Jagdev Singh, S/o late Sh. Arjun Singh was working as Cashier at Libra Filling Station for the last about 30 years. He used to deposit the earnings of the petrol pump in UCO Bank, Bank Complex, Azadpur, New Subzi Mandi. On 1st December, 2004 at about 10:30AM, he left the petrol pump on his scooter bearing No.DL4 1879 for dep...
Tag this Judgment!Md. Kareem @ Rahul Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 31, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 05, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1504/2013 JAHANGIR @ IKKA @ IBRAHIM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus STATE + ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CRL.A. 1615/2013 MD. KAREEM @ RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu Adv. alongwith Shruti Tiwari, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jahangir @ Ikka @ Ibrahim and Md.Karim @ Rahul challenge the impugned judgment dated July 25, 2012 convicting them for offences punishable under Sections 395/397/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated August 09, 2012 whereby Jahangir @ Ikka has been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of `10,000/- for offence punishable under Section 395 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 10 years...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Verma Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2014 + Crl. MB9742014 in CRL.A. 603/2014 ANIL VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior adv. with Mr. Sanjay Abbot, Advs. versus CBI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. R.V. Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI Crl. MB10152014 in CRL.A. 623/2014 AVINASH CHANDER CHANANA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior adv. with Mr. Anil Sethi, Advs. versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI + Crl. MB100022014 in CRL.A. 802/2014 ASHWANI KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Das, Adv. versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for CBI + Crl. MB101332014 in CRL.A. 1002/2014 BHIMA RAZU PRASAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Adv. versus CBI & OTH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for CBI Crl.MB.974/14 in Crl.A.603/2014, Crl.MB.1015/14 in Crl.A.623/2014, % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUP...
Tag this Judgment!Moradabad Toll Road Co. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissiner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on September 09, 2014 Judgment delivered on November 05, 2014 + ITA512013 & CM15582013 MORADABAD TOLL ROAD CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Singh, Ms.Swati Sumbly and Mr.Ashish Goel, Advocates Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSINER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: + Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms.Swati Thapa, Advocate ITA Nos. 65/2014 with CM27402014 & 81/2014 with CM37962014 MORADABAD TOLL ROAD CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ramesh Singh, Ms.Swati Sumbly & Mr.Ashish Goel, Advocates Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: ITA No.51/2013 & connected appeals Mr.Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Abhishek Singh Baghel and Mr.Arjun Harkauli, Advocates Page 1 of 26 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.These three appeals involve a common substantial question of law, which is reproduced as under:Whether the In...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ishwar Lal and ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 984/2014 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. .... Appellant Through Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate versus ISHWAR LAL & ORS Through ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.17952/2014 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. MAC.APP. 984/2014 & CM No.17951/2014 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 22.8.2014.2. The brief facts giving rise to the claim petition is that on 23.10.2013 the deceased Nitin was going to Sahibabad alongwith his Uncle. When he was waiting for the conveyance at Arthala Peer he was hit by a Mauti Van driven at a high speed. Nitin suffered injuries and was later declared dead. Nitin was a student of Class XI stated to be giving tuitions to the primary students and was earning Rs.15,000/- per month.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.12,00,960/-. The Tribunal c...
Tag this Judgment!Bayer Corporation Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 11.2014 CM96872014 in W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar, Ms Arpita Sawhney and Mr Arun Kumar. For the Respondents : Mr Riput Daman S. Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh for UOI. Mr Mukesh Anand with Ms Sonia Sharma, Mr V.C. Jha for R-2 to 4 Customs Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 This is an application filed on behalf of respondent no.5 (hereafter referred to as NPL) inter alia praying for permission to export 1 kg. of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (hereafter API) Sorafenib for the purposes of conducting development/clinical studies and trials. The said application was necessitated because of an interim order dated 26.03.2014 passed by this Court whereby respondent nos. 1 to 4 were directed to ensure ...
Tag this Judgment!