Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 124 of about 1,333 results (0.022 seconds)Driving Skill Institute and Research (Ngo) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5963/2013 & CM NOS. 13141 & 15293/2013 DRIVING SKILL INSTITUTE & RESEARCH (NGO) ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Anju Bhattacharya. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for Department of Transport, GNCTD. AND + W.P.(C) 6913/2013 & CM No.14967/2013 SIMONS MOTOR DRIVING TRAINING INSTITUTE & RESEARCH SOCIETY ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Dalal. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for Department of Transport, GNCTD. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (in W.P.(C) 5963/2013) impugns an administrative order dated 05.09.2013 passed by Deputy Commissioner (Operations), Transport Department whereby all reco...
Tag this Judgment!G K Nijhawan Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. h November, 2014 + RSA3232014 & C.M. No.18140/2014 G K NIJHAWAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. B.S.Rana, Advocate versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Rana, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) Appellant, an employee of respondent-Corporation, was charged with misconduct and after a departmental enquiry, a major penalty of reduction in basic pay by two steps was inflicted upon him, which was challenged by way of a civil suit and the said civil suit has been dismissed by trial court and the said dismissal stands affirmed by the First Appellate Court vide impugned judgment of 26th August, 2014. The factual matrix of this case stands already noticed in the opening paragraphs of the impugned judgment and needs no reproduction. At the hearing of second appeal, learned counsel for appellant contended that Enquiry Officer (DW-2) has admitted in evidence that...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. A.K. Banerji and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :16. 10.2014 Judgment delivered on :07. 11.2014 CRL.REV.P. 646/2008 DR. A.K. BANERJI & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. S.S. Gandhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Keshav Mohan and Ms. Amrita Narayan, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are three petitioners before this Court. Petitioner No.1 Dr. A.K. Banerji, petitioner No.3 Dr. Varindera Paul Singh are the two Neurosurgeons and petitioner No.2, is a general physician. The present proceedings have arisen out of the complainant dated 06.02.2005 filed by Munni Devi Barthwal alleging medical negligence against the aforenoted doctors. 2 Record reflects that on 30.11.2004, the complainant Munni Devi Barthwal was admitted in VIMHANS Hospital (where the petitioners were working at that time) on being diagnosed as a case of Dorsal Myelitis. In the course of her tre...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar Sachdeva Vs. M/S J K Steel
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5387/2013 NARESH KUMAR SACHDEVA Represented by: Advocate ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, versus M/S J K STEEL ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Previous order sheets reveal that notice to the respondent was issued in the instant petition vide order dated 30.08.2013.2. Accordingly, Mr. Nishant Nanda, advocate appeared on behalf of the respondent on 22.10.2013. However, thereafter on six consecutive dates appeared none on behalf of respondent. So is the position today. However, this Court has decided to dispose of the petition in the absence of the respondent.3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 28.02.2013 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court V, Karkardooma Court in PWA No.67/2009.4. The petitioner raised a dispute vide ID No.26/2005 and award was passed in favour of the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ram Adhar Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:7. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3020/2012 SHRI RAM ADHAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Arti Bansal, Advocate. Versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Latika Chaudhary for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the orders dated 26.09.2007 and 07.03.2008 issued by the respondent/Delhi Transport Corporation.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the petitioner initially challenged the aforementioned order dated 26.09.2007 vide W.P.(C) No.742/2010, however, the same was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in view of the subsequent order passed by the Management on 26.09.2007 granting him promotion with effect from 01.06.1995.3. Earlier the jurisdiction to deal with the matters relating to DTC was with this Court, how...
Tag this Judgment!Satyawan Vs. Dharam Pal
Court: Delhi
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. h November, 2014 + RSA3222014 & C.M. Nos.18138-39/2014 SATYAWAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. G.D. Sharma, Advocate versus DHARAM PAL ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) Appellant is the plaintiff whose suit for recovery of possession of part of property No.AB-38/2, Amar Puri, Nabi Karim, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi, comprising ground floor, first floor, second floor and terrace floor with roof rights, as shown in the site plan in terms of Partition Deed of 30th August, 1999 was decreed by the trial court and vide impugned judgment of 27th August, 2014, the First Appellate Court has reversed the trial courts judgment and dismissed appellants suit while noting that the suit property is owned by mother of the parties, who is not a party to the aforesaid Partition deed. The opening paragraphs of the impugned judgment notice the facts in this case and so, the factual background of ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Dina Nath (Now Deceased) Through His Legal Hei Vs. Sh. Manohar Lal ...
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.300/2012 and C.M. No.11729/2012 (stay) 7th November, 2014 % SH. DINA NATH (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ......Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.K. Modi, Advocate. VERSUS SH. MANOHAR LAL KAPOOR Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Ashok Sapra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Rent Control Revision Petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 29.3.2012 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted premises being shop no.492, Ground Floor, Ward no.14, Bartan Market, Sadar Bazar, Delhi.2. The respondent/landlord had f...
Tag this Judgment!Sobat Singh Vs. Ramesh Chandra Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
$-2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.842/2009 Date of decision:07. h November, 2014 RAJESH TYAGI & ORS. Through: Nemo. ..... Appellants versus RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Lakshita Sethi for Mr. Anup. J.Bhambhani, Amicus Curiae Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Ali Noor and Ms. Astha Jain, Advocate for UOI AND MAC. APP. No.422/2009 SOBAT SINGH Through: ..... Appellants Ms. Sandhya Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kishan Nautiyal, Advocate versus RAMESH CHANDRA GUPTA & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for Insurance Company Mr. O.P. Maini, Amicus Curiae Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr. Noor Anand and Ms. Astha Jain, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA J.R. MIDHA, J.(Oral) 1. India has dubious distinction of having worst record of road accidents. According to the latest Road Transport Ministry report, a total of 4,90,383 road accidents were reported in 2...
Tag this Judgment!Anita Bhandari Vs. Ved Kaur and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:7. h November, 2014 + RSA3142014 ANITA BHANDARI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Baweja, Advocate with appellant in person versus VED KAUR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) Caveat No.957/2014 (u/S148A CPC) Respondent is represented through counsel. Caveat stands discharged. C.M.No.17896/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. RSA3142014 & C.M.No.17895/2014 (for stay) In respondents suit for ejectment in respect of Shop No.C-20, Main Road, Opposite SBI, Masoodpur, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, a jurisdictional issue was treated as preliminary Issue No.1, which reads as under:- RSA No.314/2014 Page 1 (i) This court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit for ejectment as the jurisdiction of this court is barred under Section 50 of Delhi Rent Control Act. The aforesaid preliminary Issue was decided against appellantdefendant while holding as under...
Tag this Judgment!Simons Motor Driving Training Institute and Research Vs. Govt. of Nct ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5963/2013 & CM NOS. 13141 & 15293/2013 DRIVING SKILL INSTITUTE & RESEARCH (NGO) ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Anju Bhattacharya. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for Department of Transport, GNCTD. AND + W.P.(C) 6913/2013 & CM No.14967/2013 SIMONS MOTOR DRIVING TRAINING INSTITUTE & RESEARCH SOCIETY ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Dalal. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) for Department of Transport, GNCTD. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (in W.P.(C) 5963/2013) impugns an administrative order dated 05.09.2013 passed by Deputy Commissioner (Operations), Transport Department whereby all reco...
Tag this Judgment!