Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramnik Singh Uppal and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
(III) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6218/2014 and CM No.15031/2014 RAMNIK SINGH UPPAL & ORS ... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi For the Respondents : Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj for UOI Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.14/19...
indu Katariya Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
33(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5949/2014 & CM145402014 INDU KATARIYA ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Dinesh Garg with Ms Uditi Khattar For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-4&5/L&B & LAC. Mr Anil Soni with Mr Naginder Benipal for R-1& 2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894...
Maan Singh and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
$~31(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5830/2014 & CM143292014 MAAN SINGH & ORS .... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Dinesh Garg For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Siddharth Panda for R-4 & 5. Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/ DDA. Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj for R-1 & 2/ UOI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.14/1987-88 date...
Rakesh JaIn and ors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6075/2014 ... Petitioners RAKESH JAIN & ORS versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan, Ms Smita Maan and Mr Vishal Maan For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal for R-3/DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which Award No.14/198788...
M/S Saffron Promotors Private Limited Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
34(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5983/2014 M/S SAFFRON PROMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-4/DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-2&3/L&B & LAC. Mr Anil Soni with Mr Naginder Benipal for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in...
Zile Singh and anr Vs. the Honble Lieutenant Governor and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
$~29(II) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5599/2014 ZILE SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus THE HONBLE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Dhruv Sharma For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-1, 2 & 4. Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/ DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that this matter is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Girish Chhabra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.: W.P.(C) 2759/2011 decided on 12.09.2014. He states that although possession of the subject land has been taken, the award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) was made more than five years prior to the commencement of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Re...
Prakash Chand Sharma and ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5811/2014 & CM No.14290/2014 PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA & ORS ..... Petitioners versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Jitender Vashisth, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr Yeeshu Jain, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and i...
Green Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
(III) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6081/2014 and CM No.14789/2014 ... Petitioner GREEN FINANCE PVT. LTD. versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N.S. Vasisht, Mr M.P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta for R-3/DDA Mr Yeeshu Jain and Mr Siddharth Panda for R-4 & 5 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Awa...
Sanjay Kumar Grover and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4681/2014 and CM No.9329/2014 SANJAY KUMAR GROVER & ANR. ... Petitioners versus ... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Raghuvinder Varma For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B Mr Amit Mehra for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which Award No.8/199697 dated 11.12.19...
Triloki Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 10.2014 Pronounced on:03. 11.2014 + CRL.A.1271/2013 AJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant Versus STATE + ..... Respondent CRL.A.1272/2013, CRL.M.B.2019/2013 TRILOKI CHAND ..... Appellant Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Sh. R.M. Tufail with Sh. Farooq Chaudhary and Sh. Vishal Raj Sahijpal, Advocates, for the appellants in both the appeals. Sh. Varun Goswami, APP on behalf of the State with Inspector Rajbir Singh, PS S.P. Badli, in both appeals. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These appeals are directed against a common judgment and order on the point of sentence of the learned ASJ Rohini in S.C. No.399/2007. The appellants (hereafter referred to by their names, i.e. Ajay and Triloki) were convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 302/307 IPC read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, ("IPC") and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for CRL...
- ‹ Prev
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 132
- 133
- 134
- Next ›
- Last »