Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Afzal Sha @ Suraj Ali Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Ajay Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 03, 2014 % + CRL.A.781/2011 AFZAL SHA @ SURAJ ALI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 784/2011 AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms.Neha Singh, Ms.Pankhuri Mehndiratta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Kashmere Gate CRL.A. 1270/2013 SONU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.No.781/2011 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Anil Kumar Pandey, PS Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J...
Mukul Verma Vs. Delhi Sc/St/Obc Minorities and Handicapped Financial
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6446/2014 Date of decision:03. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: MUKUL VERMA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate versus DELHI SC/ST/OBC MINORITIES & HANDICAPPED FINANCIAL & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Through : None. .... Respondent CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, none was present on behalf of the respondent/Corporation. As a result, the matter had to be renotified for today with a request made to learned counsel for the petitioner to give a written intimation of the next date of hearing, to the nominated counsel for the respondent/Corporation.2. Counsel for the petitioner states that he had personally informed Mr.Rajesh Baweja, nominated counsel for the respondent/Corporation about the pendency of the present petition and conveyed the next date of hearing and had also served a copy of the paper book on him.3. Despite the same, none is present for the respondent.4. T...
Maan Softech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5784/2014 & CM142532014 MAAN SOFTECH PVT. LTD. ..Petitioner versus ..Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi. For the Respondents : Mr Ajay Digpaul with Kunal Punj for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Mr Siddharth Panda for LAC/L&B. Mr Dhanesh Relan and Mr Arush Bhandari for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of ...
Narender Singh Rawat Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 03, 2014 + CRL.A. 178/2013 NARENDER SINGH RAWAT ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Tarun Nanda and Mr.Ashu Sharma, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Dinesh Kumar Sharma, PS Mahindra Park CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Narender Singh Rawat has been held guilty of having murdered his wife Sunita. The incriminating evidence relied upon against Narender Singh Rawat is the testimony of Shakuntala PW-3, the wife of the brother of Sunita who was an eye witness. The motive has been held proved through the testimony of Shakuntala and Abhishek PW-4, the son of Narender Singh Rawat and his deceased wife. Clothes which Narender Singh Rawat was wearing when the crime was committed on which human blood of group B was detected has been held to be further incriminating evi...
Anil Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5420/2014 & CM107762014 ANIL KUMAR AGGARWAL ..Petitioner versus ..Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ashim Vachher and Mr Pawash Piyush. For the Respondents : Mr Bhagwan Swarup Shukla and Mr Brijesh Singh for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Mr Siddharth Panda for LAC/L&B. Ms Mrinalini S.Gupta and Ms Ruhi Chopra for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner claims that neither possession of the subject land has been taken nor has any compensation been paid and, therefore, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the a...
Sushil Thakran Vs. the Chairman-cum-managing Director, Oriental Insur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5901/2014 & CM144752014 Date of decision:03. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: SUSHIL THAKRAN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate versus THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPNAY LTD. & ORS. .... Respondents Through : Mr. Rahul Ranjan Verma and Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 with Mr.N.N.Mathur, RM RO-1 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. With the consent of the counsels for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission, in view of the limited relief sought by the petitioner.2. Before dealing with the case, it may be noted that on the last date of hearing, in view of the stand taken by the counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 that he had not received any instructions from the Department and was therefore, unable to render any assistance, the court was compelled to call upon the Regional Manager of the respondents No.1 & 2 ...
Magpie Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5579/2014 & CM138162014 MAGPIE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. ..Petitioner versus ..Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal, Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi. For the Respondents : Ms Anubha Bhardwaj with Mr Dev P.Bhardwaj for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Mr Siddharth Panda for LAC/L&B. Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) ...
Vrinda Farms Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
32(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5942/2014 & CM145252014 ... Petitioner VRINDA FARMS PVT. LTD versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sunit Bansal with Mr Ateev Mathur and Ms Richa Oberoi For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-2/L&B. Mr Sarat Chandra with Mr Sachin Chandra for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter refe...
Vishnu Hiranand Kirpalani Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
36(I) THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6002/2014 & CM146462014 VISHNU HIRANAND KIRPALANI ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr N. S. Vasisht with Mr M. P. Bhargava, Mr Vishal Singh and Ms Jyoti Kataria For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-3/DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-4&5/L&B & LAC. Mr Vikas Mahajan with Mr Rohan Gupta and Ms S. S. Rai for R-1 & 2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated und...
- ‹ Prev
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- Next ›
- Last »