Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 1,333 results (0.011 seconds)Wasim Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :28. h November, 2014 % + CRL.A. 740/2013 WASIM Through : ..... Appellant Counsel for the Petitioner. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the Appellant impugning the judgment dated 21.02.2013 and order on sentence dated 22.02.2013 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.47/2012 whereby the Appellant was convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo SI for six months.2. Briefly stating, the case FIR No.42/2012 under Section 363/376 IPC was registered at PS Chandni Mahal on the basis of complaint made by Mohd. Rukhsar. As per the complaint Ex.PW2/A, the Complainant Mohd. Rukhsar went to Police Station on 27.03.2012 and stated before...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Prem Raj Chaudhry(Since Decd. Thr. Lrs) Vs. Sh. Babu Ram Gupta and ...
Court: Delhi
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.2043/1989 28th November, 2014 SH. PREM RAJ CHAUDHRY(SINCE DECD. THR. LRS) ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Nitinjay Choudhary, Advocate. Versus SH. BABU RAM GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr.Vidit Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Review Petition No.314/2014 & I.A.No.12457/2014 1. This review petition is filed against the judgment dated 03.9.2012 by which the suit filed by the review petitioners/plaintiffs was dismissed with costs.2. Today the only argument which is urged before this Court is that this Court has wrongly recorded the admission in para nos. 4 to 10 of the judgment dated 03.9.2012 that it was conceded on behalf of the review petitioners/plaintiffs that the review petitioners/plaintiffs have received the balance consideration. It is argued that no such concession was given.3. The judgment in this case was passed on 03.9.2012...
Tag this Judgment!Ex. Cfn Maha Singh Dagar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing & Order:27. h November, 2014 + W.P. (C) No.3525/2011 EX. CFN MAHA SINGH DAGAR ... Petitioner Through: Col. S.R. Kalkal, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the order dated 09.04.2010 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench), New Delhi (AFT), which rejected his claim for disability pension and further direction to the respondents to release 40% disability pension in his favour w.e.f the date of his discharge till 31st December 1995 and 50% disability pension with effect from 1.1.1996 alongwith interest @ 12% per annum on the arrears of the amount due.2. The petitioners case is that he was enrolled in the Indian Army...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Mohan @ Mohan Upadhyay Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 14, 2014 Decision on: November 27, 2014 CRL.A. No.414 of 2008 JAI MOHAN @ MOHAN UPADHYAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Choudhary with Mr. Anil Choudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. WITH CRL.A. No.429 of 2008 HARENDER TOMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Pandey with Mr. Kulvinder Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. AND CRL.A. No.74 of 2009 ..... Appellant NAWAB Through: None. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Narender Kumar, P.S. Mandawali. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 Introduction 1. These three appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 16th April 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.36 of 2007 convi...
Tag this Judgment!Raid Hoda Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Arun Bansal Vs. Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar University
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :27. h NOVEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 892/2008 SHRI ARUN BANSAL Through : ..... Plaintiff Ms.Manisha Agrawal Narain, Advocate. VERSUS DR.BHIMRAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY ..... Defendant Through : Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present suit for recovery of ` 56,67,048/- has been preferred by Arun Bansal carrying on business under the name and style of M/s. Confidential Enterprises. Case of the plaintiff as set up in the plaint is as under :2. The plaintiff is running his business under the name and style of M/s. Confidential Enterprises as sole proprietor. The defendant Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar University (Formerly Agra University) used to conduct entrance examination test every year. Papers for entrance examination CPMT2005leaked out and the examination had to be cancelled. Thereafter, another examination in the year 2005 was conducted and it was allocated to the defend...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shish Pal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~A-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2014 + CM(M). 922/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. versus SHISH PAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Tribunal dismissing the application of the petitioner for directions to refund of Rs.50,000/- plus interest totalling Rs.55,162/- paid as per the order of the Tribunal dated 27.07.2006 in exercise of power under Section 140 of the M.V. Act on account of an alleged accident that had taken place on 30.04.1999 wherein it was alleged that Smt.Gasna Devi had expired in the said accident.2. Subsequently the Tribunal passed an award on 25.02.2012 holding that the death of Smt. Gasna Devi was not as a consequence of any motor accident. The Tribunal held that she died due to natural causes inasmuch as she was seri...
Tag this Judgment!Rishi Kanwar Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Yusuf Jawed Vs. Jamia Milia Islamia
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Pahwa Vs. Shri Rajiv Gupta
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC. REV.Nos.474/2013,107/2014, 108/2014 & 110/2014 27th November, 2014 % 1. RC. REV. No.474/2013 RAJ KUMAR PAHWA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.P. Thareja, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJIV GUPTA Through:2. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.107/2014 SH. LALIT KUMAR ARORA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through:3. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.108/2014 SH. AJAY CHOPRA Through: RCR4742013 & conn. matters ..... Petitioner Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through:4. ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shariq, Advocate and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocate. RC. REV. No.110/2014 SH. DALIP CHOPRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aly Mirza, Advocate. Versus SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Sha...
Tag this Judgment!