Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 11 of about 1,333 results (0.028 seconds)Shri Arun Bansal Vs. Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar University
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :27. h NOVEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 892/2008 SHRI ARUN BANSAL Through : ..... Plaintiff Ms.Manisha Agrawal Narain, Advocate. VERSUS DR.BHIMRAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY ..... Defendant Through : Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present suit for recovery of ` 56,67,048/- has been preferred by Arun Bansal carrying on business under the name and style of M/s. Confidential Enterprises. Case of the plaintiff as set up in the plaint is as under :2. The plaintiff is running his business under the name and style of M/s. Confidential Enterprises as sole proprietor. The defendant Dr.Bhimrao Ambedkar University (Formerly Agra University) used to conduct entrance examination test every year. Papers for entrance examination CPMT2005leaked out and the examination had to be cancelled. Thereafter, another examination in the year 2005 was conducted and it was allocated to the defend...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shish Pal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~A-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 11.2014 + CM(M). 922/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. versus SHISH PAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 31.05.2012 passed by the Tribunal dismissing the application of the petitioner for directions to refund of Rs.50,000/- plus interest totalling Rs.55,162/- paid as per the order of the Tribunal dated 27.07.2006 in exercise of power under Section 140 of the M.V. Act on account of an alleged accident that had taken place on 30.04.1999 wherein it was alleged that Smt.Gasna Devi had expired in the said accident.2. Subsequently the Tribunal passed an award on 25.02.2012 holding that the death of Smt. Gasna Devi was not as a consequence of any motor accident. The Tribunal held that she died due to natural causes inasmuch as she was seri...
Tag this Judgment!J. Abhishek and Ors Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!v. Satish Kumar Vs. the Commissioner North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 11.2014 + W.P.(C) 887/2014, C.M. NOS.1782/2014 (for taking additional documents on record) & 9412/2014 (for stay) V. SATISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. versus THE COMMISSIONER CORPORATION & ORS. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel, for Respondent No.1. Sh. Sumit Bansal, Ms. Sumi Anand and Ms. Richa Oberoi, Advocates, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The main issue which arises for this Courts consideration in the present writ petition which questions an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 23.02.2012 in O.A. No.3171/2010 is whether the third respondents regular appointment with effect from 02.09.2002 by an order of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) dated 12.05.2010 was justified and legal. The petitioners...
Tag this Judgment!Aditya Khinchi and Ors Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Kumar Vs. Delhi University and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.956/2013 AMIT KUMAR + + + + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.189/2014 RAID HODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.210/2014 ARCHANA KRISHNAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.211/2014 SHAGUFTA HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. AND LPA No.213/2014 AMIT DIXIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv. Versus DELHI UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal, Adv. + AND LPA No.214/2014 RISHI KANWAR Through: + +...
Tag this Judgment!Satbinder Singh Madan @ S.S. Madan Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 532 of 2008 & Crl.M.A. No.7563 of 2008 (for stay) Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Decision on: November 27, 2014 JATINDER SINGH MADAN @ J.S.MADAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. And CRL.A. 573 of 2008 & Crl.M.A. No.8034 of 2008 (for stay) SATBINDER SINGH MADAN @ S.S. MADAN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura with Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2711.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the common order dated 17 th April 2008 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange (AT) dismissing Appeal Nos. 195 of 2005 and 196 of 2005 filed by Mr. Jatinder Singh Madan @ J.S. Madan (Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.532 of 2008) and by Mr. Satbinder Singh Madan @ S.S. Madan (Appel...
Tag this Judgment!Ex. Cfn Maha Singh Dagar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing & Order:27. h November, 2014 + W.P. (C) No.3525/2011 EX. CFN MAHA SINGH DAGAR ... Petitioner Through: Col. S.R. Kalkal, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the order dated 09.04.2010 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench), New Delhi (AFT), which rejected his claim for disability pension and further direction to the respondents to release 40% disability pension in his favour w.e.f the date of his discharge till 31st December 1995 and 50% disability pension with effect from 1.1.1996 alongwith interest @ 12% per annum on the arrears of the amount due.2. The petitioners case is that he was enrolled in the Indian Army...
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : November 27, 2014 + CRL.A. 130/2012 PRADEEP Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Girdhari Lal, Intelligence Officer, NCB Sub-zone Ajmer. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Suspicion howsoever grave cannot be treated as proof and to base a conviction for offence under Section 302 and 201 IPC the prosecution is required to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused not only committed murder of the deceased but also caused disappearance of the evidence of crime. This onus of the prosecution can be discharged either by leading direct evidence or circumstantial evidence. However, in the present case the learned Trial Court failed to notice that neither by direct evidence nor circumstantial, the prosecution has been able to prove that Pradeep committed mu...
Tag this Judgment!Rashid Rahbar Vs. Oriental Insurance Co Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. 07.2014 Pronounced on:27. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 578/2011 and CM Appl.8701/2013 RASHID RAHBAR Through ..... Appellant Ms.Padmini Gupta, Advocate. versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.J.P.N.Shahi and Ms.Kirti Sethi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant seeking enhancement of compensation. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition and thereafter the present appeal is that on 17.10.2007 the appellant was going with his brother on a motorcycle. In front of RTO Office before Police Post Okhla, Delhi, their motorcycle was hit by a truck said to be driven at a very fast speed in a rash and negligent manner. The motorcycle fell down and the appellant suffered grievous injuries. The offending vehicle crushed the left leg of the appellant which had to be amputated.2. On compensation the Tribunal awarded the following compens...
Tag this Judgment!