Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
initiative for Transportation and Development Pro Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 4572/2007, CM APPL.8544/07, 6986/10 & 17940/11, 626, 2724, 2801, 3663, 16320, 16453, 16454/2012 W.P. (C) 8580/2009, CM APPL.5656/2009, CM APPL.8503/2012 CONT. CAS (C) 564/2010, CM APPL.14826/2010, 793/2012 W.P. (C) 4572/2007 MANUSHI SANGATHAN, DELHI ..... Petitioner versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND ORS. ....Respondents CONT. CASE (C) 564/2010 MANUSHI SANGATHAN versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. ..... Petitioner .....Respondents Appearance: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa, Advocates for petitioners in WP (C) 4572/07 & Cont. Case (C) 564/2010. Mr. Sanjiv Ralli with Mr. Manu Parasher, Advocates for Intervener/Applicant ChandniChowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal. Mr. Nalin Sinha, petitioner in person in W.P. (C) 8580/2009. Mr. V.K. Tandon with Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocates for PWD & GNCTD with Mr. Arun Baroka, Secretary, P...
Kamal Jeet Singh @ Rana and anr. Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :20. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 573/2000 & CRL.M.A.No.2595/2000 KAMAL JEET SINGH @ RANA & ANR. ....Appellants Through : Mr.I.S.Kapur, Advocate for the appellant Kamal Jeet Singh. Mr.M.C.Dhingra, Advocate for the appellant Anil Pedro. VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anil Pedro @ Sonu (A-1) and Kamal Jeet Singh @ Rana (A-2) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 31.08.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.128/97 arising out of FIR No.93/96 PS Sarojini Nagar by which they were held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 307/324/34 IPC and by an order dated 01.09.2000, were awarded RI for two years with fine ` 1,000/each under Sections 307/34 IPC and RI for six months with fine ` 500/- each under Section 324 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate co...
John Smedly Ltd. Vs. Blues Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h December, 2013 Date of Decision:20. h December, 2013 % + CO.PET. 294/2012 JOHN SMEDLY LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Uttam Dutt, Advocate. versus BLUES CLOTHING COMPANY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is a petition filed by M/s. John Smedly Ltd. of Derbyshire, England under section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Blues Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd. of New Delhi, India for non-payment of GBP87240 as per its accounts, for supply of readymade garments.2. The petitioner (UK company) which is in the business of manufacture of knitted garments supplied garments to the respondentcompany (Indian company) under an agreement dated 23-10-2009, valid for one year. The UK company supplied garments to the Indian company during the period from 12-11-2009 to 25-11-2010 under six invoices for a total sum of GBP114999...
Babu Lal Goel Vs. Shiv Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 + CM(M) 430/2012 & C.M. No.6715/2012 BABU LAL GOEL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Vipin Nandwani, Adv. versus SHIV KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Manoranjan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 19 th October, 2011 whereby the learned District Judge in RCT No.11/2011 dismissed the petitioners appeal filed against the order by which the application of the respondents under Section 15(7) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was allowed by the ARC holding that the default is wilful and contumacious and strikes off the defence of the petitioner who has challenged both orders.2. The facts leading to the petition are: a) The tenanted premises i.e. Shop No.WZ-271, Nangal Raya, Jail Road, New Delhi was let out to the petitioner on 1989. b) The respondent i...
M/S Mecon Ltd. Vs. M/S Pyro Engineers (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 + EX.F.A. 28/2013 M/S MECON LTD. Through ..... Appellant Mr.D.P.Mukherjee, Adv. with Mrs. Nandini Sen, Adv. versus M/S PYRO ENGINEERS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Chayan Sarkar, Adv. with Mr. Karan Bindra, Mr. Kumar Ankur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Dispute arose between the parties. These were referred for Arbitration. After recording the evidence and argument, Arbitral Tribunal rendered the Award on 15th June, 2012 in favour of the respondent. Operative portion of the Award passed in para 33 reads as under :33. Accordingly, we hold that the claimant is entitled to receive the sum of Rs.12,64,414/- from the respondent as balance amount due to it on account of the final bill. We may point out that the respondent had raised a plea that SCOPE is a necessary party as the respondent had entered into contract with the claimant on behalf of SCOPE. We had decided...
Jawahar Balwani and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :12.12.2013 Judgment delivered on:20.12.2013 CRL.A.344/1998 JAWAHAR BALWANI AND ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 On 19.10.1993 on the second floor of house No.F-1U173 Pitam Pura, Delhi, the dead body of Rita was discovered. This discovery had been made by her husband Madan Lal (PW-13) who on returning home at 08:15-08:30 pm from his shop at Sadar Bazar found the lights in the building off; on entering the room and switching on the light, he found articles scattered on the ground; in the drawing room, the dead body of his wife Rita was lying; the television was on at full volume; his son Bharat Parwani (PW-6) was lying in an injured condition and was groaning for water. He was not in a condition to speak. Brother of PW13 Raj Kumar (PW-9) living o...
Vikaas Ahluwalia Vs. Simran Ahluwalia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 11.2013 Pronounced on:20. 12.2013 + FAO1432013, C.M. No.4725/2013 VIKAAS AHLUWALIA ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Aniruddha Choudhary and Sh. Abhey Narula, Advocates. Versus SIMRAN AHLUWALIA ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Manish Saryal, Ms. Sushma Unni and Sh. Anshumaan Sahni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeal, arising out of matrimonial proceedings, has been filed by the respondent/husband, who impugns an order dated 08.02.2013 of the Family Court, Saket, New Delhi in an application under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereafter HMA) in pending matrimonial proceedings, i.e. HMA1342011. The Family Court directed the husband to pay `1,25,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the wife and a further sum of `1,00,000/- as litigation expe...
Jose Meleth Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 11.2013 Pronounced on:20. 12.2013 + W.P. (C) 1443/2012, C.M. APPL. 3149/2012 JOSE MELETH ...... Petitioner Through: Sh. Jayant Tripathi, Advocate. versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Sumeet Pushkarna with Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Advocates, for Resp. No.1. Sh. Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rakesh Kumar Garg, Advocate, for Resp. No.2. Sh. Shashank Shekhar, for Sh. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate, for UGC. Sh. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Maneesh Goyal, Advocate, for Resp. No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks a writ of quo warranto declaring that the fourth respondent (Dr. S. Sivakumar, hereafter referred to as W.P.(C) 1443/2012 Page 1 Sivakumar) is not entitled to hold his position as a Research Professor at the Indian Law Institute, New Delhi ...
Sh. Amarnath (Now Deceased) Thr His Lrs Vs. Sh. D.K. JaIn (Now Decease ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 + CM(M) 1272/2013 SH AMARNATH (NOW DECEASED) THR HIS LRS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajiv Garg, Adv. with Mr.K.K.Aggarwal, Adv. versus SH D K JAIN (NOW DECEASED) THR HIS LRS ..... Respondents Through None AND + CM(M) 1274/2013 SH AMARNATH (NOW DECEASED) THR HIS LRS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajiv Garg, Adv. with Mr.K.K.Aggarwal, Adv. versus SH D K JAIN (NOW DECEASED) THR HIS LRS ..... Respondents Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India have been filed by the petitioner assailing the judgment and order dated 10th September, 2009 passed by the Court of learned ADJ-cum-ASJ, Tis Hazari, Delhi in RFA No.18 of 2008.2. The facts leading to the petition are as under: a) The respondent instituted suits for recovery of rent against the petitioner of `8,480 for the period 1st January 1977 to 31st August, 197...
HarIn Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 CM(M) 692/2008 & CM No.8383/2008 HARIN SHAH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Kamal Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Sudeep Singh, Adv. versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... Respondent Through Mr.A.Y.Chitale, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mike Desai, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner herein has challenged the impugned order dated 22 nd April, 2008 passed by Mr.R.B. Singh, Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, allowing the respondents application under Order VI rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC seeking to amend its plaint.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent filed a suit for declaration of respondents right to immovable property, for possession and for recovery of damage for wrongful use and occupation of the said property. The written statement was filed by the petitioner (defendant in the suit). A specific objection was raised by the petitioner in the written statement s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »