Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Azhar Vs. Tebrej Alam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 + RC.REV. 141/2010 MOHD AZHAR ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person. versus TEBREJ ALAM Through ..... Respondent Mr.Rajeev Saxena, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 1st April, 2010 passed by learned ARC (East) Delhi, allowing the leave to defend application of the respondent in an eviction petition filed by the petitioner in respect of a flat bearing No.H-204, Taj Sartaj Group Co-operative Housing Society (Taj Enclave), Geeta Colony, Delhi-31 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises).2. The petitioner had stated in an eviction petition that he bonafidely required the tenanted premises for himself and his family consisting of his wife, 5 daughters of who 2 were married and 3 were unmarri...
Shashi Vs. Sudershan Sharma and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2013 % + RFA5962004 SHASHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Advocates. Versus SUDERSHAN SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Wadhwa, Mr. Ranjeet Pandey and Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocates. AND + RSA2322004 SHASHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Advocates. Versus SUDERSHAN SHARMA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Wadhwa, Mr. Ranjeet Pandey and Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The RFA impugns the judgment and decree dated 30th September, 2004 of the Court of the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.278/02/95 filed by the appellant. The RSA impugns the judgment and decree also dated 30th September, 2004 in RCA No.432/2000 filed by the respondent no.1 in RSA against the order dated 16th May, 1996 of the Court of the Civil Judge, Delhi of dism...
Aryan Sehrawat Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:16. 12.2013 Date of Decision:20. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 5283/2013 YASH SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. + W.P.(C) 5284/2013 ARYAN SEHRAWAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhawani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sumati Anand & Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advs. versus BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. R.Rangaswamy, Mr. R. Kumar & Mr. Pratek Chadha, Advs. for R-1. Mr. J.S. Bakshi & Mr A.S. Bakshi, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The only issue involved in these writ petitions is as to whether the respondents are entitled to determine the age of a person seek...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Farah Khatoon
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 9/2013 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel (Cri.) for State with Inspector Subhash Chand, SubInspector Pankaj Saroha, Police Station Nangloi, Delhi. versus FARAH KHATOON Through: % ..... Respondent Mr.A.K. Sharma, Advocate for Farah Khatoon. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER2012.2013 Reply to the contempt petition has been filed by the Respondent. In the entire reply we have noticed that not even a single word expressing remorse of her contumacious conduct as reflected in the order dated 27th November 2013. Learned counsel for the contemnor Farah Khatoon requested for a pass over so that respondent can file a fresh affidavit to express her unqualified apology for her conduct during the course of hearing of the main petition on proceedings of 27th November 2013. The contemnor Farah Khatoon is also present in cour...
Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences and ors Vs. Union of India and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 12.2013 Date of Decision:20. 12.2013 % + W.P.(C) 6261/2013 RAIPUR INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS ... Petitioners Through: Ms Bina Madhavan, Mr S. Udaya Kr. Sagar and Mr Shivendra Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC for R-1 Mr Amit Kumar, Mr Amitesh Kumar and Mr Ravinder Kumar, Advs for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioner No.3 is a society and petitioner No.2-Dr.Shambhu Nath Gupta is its Vice-President. Seeking to start a medical college in the academic year 2013-14 in the name of respondent No.1-Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, the petitioners applied to the respondentMedical Council of India, seeking permission to establish a new Medical College, with intake capacity of 150 students. An assessment of physical and teaching facilities available in the said college was carried out by the assessors appointed by MCI, o...
M/S Mdlr Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Comissioner of Income Tax and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.823/2013 Reserved on:24. h October, 2013 Date of Decision:20. h December, 2013 % M/s MDLR RESORTS PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocates. Versus COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Jr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advocate and Mr. Ashok Gautam, Assessing Officer. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.693/2013 M/S ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. PETITIONER Through Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Salil Kapoor and Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocates. Versus COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Jr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advocate and Mr. Ashok Gautam, Assessing Officer. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.995/2013 M/S NAGESHWAR REALT...
Manushi Sangathan, Delhi Vs. Govt of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 4572/2007, CM APPL.8544/07, 6986/10 & 17940/11, 626, 2724, 2801, 3663, 16320, 16453, 16454/2012 W.P. (C) 8580/2009, CM APPL.5656/2009, CM APPL.8503/2012 CONT. CAS (C) 564/2010, CM APPL.14826/2010, 793/2012 W.P. (C) 4572/2007 MANUSHI SANGATHAN, DELHI ..... Petitioner versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND ORS. ....Respondents CONT. CASE (C) 564/2010 MANUSHI SANGATHAN versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. ..... Petitioner .....Respondents Appearance: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa, Advocates for petitioners in WP (C) 4572/07 & Cont. Case (C) 564/2010. Mr. Sanjiv Ralli with Mr. Manu Parasher, Advocates for Intervener/Applicant ChandniChowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal. Mr. Nalin Sinha, petitioner in person in W.P. (C) 8580/2009. Mr. V.K. Tandon with Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocates for PWD & GNCTD with Mr. Arun Baroka, Secretary, P...
Paradise Credit P.Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 28, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: December 20, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2936/2012 PARADISE CREDIT P.LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Mathur, Ms. Nisha Rohatgi, Md. Adnan and Mr. Rohit Gupta, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for RespondentState with Inspector Manoj Kumar Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Avocate with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari and Mr. Vinam Gupta, Advocates for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Impugned order of 13th August, 2012 upholds trial courts order dismissing petitioners application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C, which is under challenge in this petition.2. The factual background of this case as noted in the impugned order is as under:The revisionist filed an application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C before the Court of ACMM, Saket, New Delhi, praying for re...
Shashi Vs. Sudershan Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2013 % + RFA5962004 SHASHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Advocates. Versus SUDERSHAN SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Wadhwa, Mr. Ranjeet Pandey and Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocates. AND + RSA2322004 SHASHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Advocates. Versus SUDERSHAN SHARMA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Wadhwa, Mr. Ranjeet Pandey and Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The RFA impugns the judgment and decree dated 30th September, 2004 of the Court of the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi in Suit No.278/02/95 filed by the appellant. The RSA impugns the judgment and decree also dated 30th September, 2004 in RCA No.432/2000 filed by the respondent no.1 in RSA against the order dated 16th May, 1996 of the Court of the Civil Judge, Delhi of dism...
Mohd. Shamim and ors. Vs. the State Through Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.Appeal Nos.246/2010, 265/2010, 378/2010 & 917/2010 Date of Decision:20. h DECEMBER, 2013 % + Crl.Appeal No.246/2010 MOHD. SHAMIM & ORS. Through ..... Petitioner Mr.K.K. Verma, Advocate Versus THE STATE THROUGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP for the State WITH + Crl.Appeal No.265/2010 KANHAIYA LAL @ MOTTU SON OF NEK RAM ..... Petitioner Through Mr.R.C. Tiwari, Advocate Versus THE STATE THROUGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP for the State AND + Crl.Appeal No.378/2010 SONU Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Nandita Rao and Ms. Neha, Advs. Versus THE STATE THROUGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP for the State AND + Crl.Appeal No.917/2010 PRADEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.F. Haq, Adv. Versus THE STATE THROUGH GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .... Respondent Through Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUST...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »