Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 12.2013 + CRL.A. 27/2010 & CRL.M.A. No.152/2010 AMIT CHAUDHARY & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Rambir Chauhan, Advs. with appellants in person versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.12.2009 whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable u/s 308/34 IPC and order of sentence dated 21.12.2009 whereby the appellants have been awarded sentence of RI for one year each with fine of `2500/- each and in default to undergo RI for three months. The benefit u/s 428 Cr.P.C has also been given.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that appellants are not challenging their conviction u/s 308/34 IPC. In fact, there is an application on record being Crl.M.A.152/2010 u/s 360 Cr.P.C filed by the appellants wherein it is stated that they are educa...
Suman Verma and ors. Vs. Sushil Mohini Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2013 % + RFA3842013, CM No.12718/2013 (for stay), CM No.12719/2013 (for condonation of delay) & CM No.12720/2013 (for filing additional documents). SUMAN VERMA & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Salim Inamdar, Mr. Vedanta Varma & Mr. Vibhor Kush, Advs. versus SUSHIL MOHINI GUPTA & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav & Mr. Vishal Mahajan, Advs. for R-2 to 16 and 18 to 20 CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 15 th March, 2013 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge, Central-09, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS No.50/04 (UID No.02401C5982592004) filed by the respondents no.1 to 21 against the predecessor of the three appellants for the relief of ejectment/mesne profits; the respondent no.22 was impleaded as the defendant no.2 to the suit though no relief was claimed against her) of ejectment of the appellants from the two a...
Traxpo Enterprises Pvt. Ltd Vs. Pec Limited and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 7918/2013 and CM No.16777/2013 (stay) TRAXPO ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kuljeet Rawal and Mr Jagjit Singh, Advs. Versus PEC LIMITED & ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Mr Arvind Chaudhary, Adv for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) The petitioner before this Court entered into an agreement with respondent No.1-PEC Limited, which is a public sector undertaking. The agreement between the said parties contained the following arbitration clause:Any dispute or difference in respect of may matter relating to or arising out of the Associateship Agreement between PEC and ASSOCIATE, if the same is not resolved amicably, will be settled at New Delhi by arbitration in accordance with Rules of Arbitration of Indian Council of Arbitration, New Delhi and the Award made in pursuance thereof shall be final and binding on the parties. The Arbitrator will give a reas...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Tek Bahadur and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:17th December, 2013 + MAC.APP. 472/2011 TEK BAHADUR Through ..... Appellant Mr. F.K. Jha, Advocate versus RAM BHAROSE & ORS Through + ..... Respondent Mr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Adv. with Mr. V.S. Vashdev, Adv. for R-3. MAC.APP. 504/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Adv. with Mr. V.S. Vashdev, Adv. versus TEK BAHADUR & ORS Through ..... Respondent Mr. F.K. Jha, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These two Appeals arise out of a judgment dated 23.02.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT-03, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi) (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 12,34,260/was awarded in favour of Tek Bahadur, for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 29.01.2009.2. MAC APP.472/2011 has been preferred by Tek Bahadur (hereinafter referred to as the Claimant) for enhancement o...
Dr.Subramanian Swamy Vs. the Registrar, Office of Registrar for Newspa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 08, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.2986/2013 DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY .....Petitioner Represented by: Petitioner in person versus THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR FOR NEWSPAPERS OF INDIA .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Joginder Sukhija, CGSC and Mr.Aditya Malhotra, Advocate for UOI Mr.Imran Ahmad Abbasi, Advocate for Mr.Gagan Gupta, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petitioner seeks a direction from this Court to rectify what the petitioner perceives to be a lacuna in the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) regarding the definition of Editor in the context of the proviso to sub-Section 8 of Section 5 of the said Act.2. The prayer in the petition to remove respondent No.3 from the post of Editor of the daily newspape...
Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 12.2013 Date of Decision:17. 12.2013 % + WP(C) No.4159 of 2013 GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gopal Surbramaniam, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Harman Sandhu, Mr. Ashish Gupta & Mr. Aditya Nayar, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Mr.Abhishek Singh Baghel, Mr. Avinash Sharma, and Ms. Monica, Advs. for CCI and Mr. S.P. Khatana, Director (Law) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.An Information was received by the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) that the manufacturers of Man Made Fibres (for short MMF) i.e. Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF), Acrylic Staple Fibre (ASF), Viscose Staple Fibre (VSF) & Nylon Staple Fibre (NSF) had imposed several restrictions on Indian Textile Industry, which are their customers for purchase of MMF, and such restrictions constitute anticompetiti...
Dr. R.B.Pandey Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5986/2000 % December 17, 2013 DR. R.B.PANDEY Through: None ......Petitioner VERSUS UOI & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Advocate for R-4&5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner prays for joinder of services rendered with previous employer organizations with the services rendered with Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidhyapeth, represented by respondent no.5, for grant of pensionary benefits.2. The earlier employer organizations of the petitioner were private institutions affiliated to Universities being Seth Niranjan Das Murarka Sanskrit Mahavidhalaya, Patna, Bihar from (10.9.1957 to 08.7.1973), Gaurakh Nath Sanskrit Vidhyapeeth, Gorakhpur, U.P from (09.7.1973 to 09.9.1976) and Jai Bharat Sadhu Sanskrit Mahavidhalaya, Haridwar, Uttrakhand from (10.9.1976 to 20.8.1979).3. A reference to the writ p...
inal Yadav @ Shyam Sunder Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :12. 12.2013 Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2013 + CRL. A.No.824/2010 INAL YADAV @ SHYAM SUNDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Krishan Kumar and Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP along with Inspector Pramod Kumar and SI Rakesh Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 On 25.11.2006 at 7.30 p.m. DD No.24 was registered at Police Post Dev Nagar giving information that a young boy aged 22 years was lying dead in E-Block Jhuggi, Dev Nagar, Delhi. This information had been conveyed by constable Girdhari Lal (PW-6). 2 Sub-inspector Lekh Raj (PW-8) along with H.C.Balram (PW-7) reached the spot; a dead body of a young boy aged 20-22 years was lying in a jhuggi of E-Block, Dev Nagar; blood was oozing out from the mouth and there were injury marks on the neck. PW-6 was present at the spot. The senior officers also reached...
Michael Mili Vs. Ifci Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7959/2013 17th December, 2013 % MICHAEL MILI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Banerjee, Advocate. Versus IFCI LIMITED Through: Respondent Mr. Dinkar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.16860/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.7959/2013 and C.M. No.16859/2013 (stay) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner who is an employee of the respondent-company seeks the relief of setting aside of the orders passed W.P.(C) No.7959/2013 page 1 of 4 by the respondent dated 1.8.2013, 13.9.2013 and 25.9.2013 whereby pay scale and allowances of the petitioner have been revised downwards.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner became an employee of the respondent-company (as Senior Associate Vice President) when the respondent-company was a private company. Appointment with the ...
M/S Aj.S.Restaurants P. Ltd. Vs. Seema Bhalla and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2013. + RFA6022003 M/S AJ.S.RESTAURANTS P. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anshum Jain for Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. Versus SEEMA BHALLA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 2nd April, 2003 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge of dismissal of Suit No.52/2002 filed by the appellant for recovery of Rs.5,50,000/- from the two respondents/defendants jointly and severally.2. This being a first appeal, was on 23rd July, 2003 when the same came up first before this Court, admitted for hearing.3. It however appears that the appellant/plaintiff did not take any steps for service of the respondents/defendants after securing admission of the appeal.4. The appeal came up before this Court in the category of Regular Matters as per its turn on 4th January, 2012 when realizing that the respondents/def...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »