Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Azimur Rahman Vs. the University of Jamia Millia and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Review Petition No.645/2013 in W.P.(C) 7592/2012 18th December, 2013 % MD. AZIMUR RAHMAN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Manoj Swarup, Ms. Lalita Kohli and Mr. Abhishek Swarup, Advocates. VERSUS THE UNIVERSITY OF JAMIA MILLIA AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Jaya Goyal, Mr. Varun Garg and Mr. Manpreet Kaur, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.16886/2013 (delay of 16 days) &16888/2013 (delay in re-filing) 1. For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing and re-filing is condoned. CMs stand disposed of. CM No.16887/2013 (Exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. Review Petition No.645/2013 in W.P(C) 7592/2012 3. This is a review petition seeking review of the judgment dated 5.9.2013 by which the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the punishment imposed of removal from service was di...
Surinder @ Vicky Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :18. h DECEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 481/2003 & CRL.M.A. 17018/2013 SURINDER @ VICKY Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Tiwari, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Surinder @ Vicky (the appellant) questions the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 09.06.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.33/2001 arising out of FIR No.42/2001 PS Mangol Puri whereby he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 392 IPC and by an order dated 04.07.2003 awarded RI for four years with fine ` 2,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 13.01.2001 at about 06.45 P.M. he and his associates Dharmender @ Chotu, Vikas and Sanju robbed Jitender and deprived him of cash ` 1,000/- and other articles. Some of the assailants were armed with weapons. During the course of investigation, statements of ...
Tejbeer Singh Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5964/2010 18th December, 2013 % TEJBEER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.A.Niyazi, Advocate with Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Advocate and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate. Versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS. Respondents Through: Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. C.V. Jose, UDC for respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + W.P.(C) No.5964/2010 and C.M. No.11742/2010 (stay) 1. In spite of repeated opportunities, respondent Nos.3 and 4 have not filed counter-affidavit in this petition of the year 2010. Last opportunity granted vide order dated 11.10.2013 has not been utilized. Right of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to file counter-affidavit is therefore closed. It is possible that counter-affidavit is not being filed inasmuch as W.P.(C) No.5964/2010 page 1 of 11 the issue in the present case could be covered by the ...
Kamal Ahmad Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % WP(C) 8049/2013 18th December, 2013 KAMAL AHMAD Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Kamlesh Jain, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Sweety Manchanda, CGSC with Mr. Debashis Mukherjee, Adv. for R1. Mr. S.Nanda Kumar, Mr. Parivesh Singh and Mr. R.Satish Kumar, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.17015/2013 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. W.P(C) 8049/2013 & CM No.17014/2013 (Stay) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, a probationary officer, impugns the order of the respondent no.2/employer dated 27.11.2013 terminating his SA.15/549/33221 2. 27 November 2013 ORDER Whereas, Sri Kamal Ahmad, appointed as Programme Officer vide letter no.SA.15/549/19494 dated 11 March 2011 in the Head Office, Sahitya Akademi at New Delhi for a period of two years under probation. Where...
Spml Infra Ltd Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2013 + O.M.P. 1273/2013 SPML INFRA LIMITED ..... PETITIONER VERSUS NTPC LIMITED & ANR + ..... RESPONDENTS O.M.P. 1274/2013 SPML INFRA LTD ..... PETITIONER VERSUS NTPC LIMITED & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh, Mr. Pradeep Gupta and Mr. S.S. Gupta, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Bharat Sangal, Ms. Saumya Agarwal, Ms. Abenta and Mr. Rohan Poddar, Advocates for R-1 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.20707/2013 (Exemption) in OMP12732013 IA No.20708/2013 (Exemption) in OMP12742013 Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP No.1273/2013 and OMP No.1274/2013 1. The captioned petitions have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. Mr. Nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. Broadly, t...
Lt Col Manish Sehgal Vs. Mrs Meenu Sehgal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 12.2013 + MAT. APP. (FC) NO.29/2013, CM APPL.12745/2013 LT COL MANISH SEHGAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Tomar, Advocate along with appellant in person. versus MRS MEENU SEHGAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal & Mr. Bharat Arora, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. NAJMI WAZIRI (Open Court) 1. This is a fathers appeal against an order of 5th August 2013 by the Family Court granting custody of his two minor daughters to their mother the respondent. The respondent/mother had earlier been granted interim custody by the same court for the Diwali vacations and the school winter holidays last year i.e. on 14th and 15th November, 2012 and also from 29th December, 2012 to 6th January, 2013 respectively. The couple had separated on 16 th August, 2012. The mother had filed the application for guardianship and interim custody of the minor children on 1st Novembe...
Spml Infra Limited Vs. Ntpc Limited and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2013 + O.M.P. 1273/2013 SPML INFRA LIMITED ..... PETITIONER VERSUS NTPC LIMITED & ANR + ..... RESPONDENTS O.M.P. 1274/2013 SPML INFRA LTD ..... PETITIONER VERSUS NTPC LIMITED & ANR ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh, Mr. Pradeep Gupta and Mr. S.S. Gupta, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Bharat Sangal, Ms. Saumya Agarwal, Ms. Abenta and Mr. Rohan Poddar, Advocates for R-1 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.20707/2013 (Exemption) in OMP12732013 IA No.20708/2013 (Exemption) in OMP12742013 Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP No.1273/2013 and OMP No.1274/2013 1. The captioned petitions have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. Mr. Nayar says that the prayers made in the captioned petitions are common, save and except the amounts referred to therein.3. Broadly, t...
Commissioner of Income Tax - Xv Vs. Bharti Mishra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.567/2013 Date of decision:18. h December, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - XV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus BHARTI MISHRA ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue submits that he does not rely and has not been able to locate any judgment in favour of the Revenue.2. The respondent-assessee, an individual, had sold shares and thereafter the sale proceeds of Rs.54,86,965/- were invested in construction of house property. Exemption was claimed under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) in the return of was utilised in the construction before date of filing of return and Rs.16,87,965/- was deposited in a capital gains account in the prescribed bank on 24th July, 2009 i.e., before the due date of filing of the return.3. The Asse...
Sh Subhash Arora Vs. Ms Meena Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:18. 12.2013 + RFA (OS) 153/2013 CAV11092013 CM APPL.19342, 19343/2013 SH SUBHASH ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary with Ms. Damini Chawla, Advocates. versus MS MEENA CHAWLA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Bhasin, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.L. Raina, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. This is an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 29.10.2013 dismissing CS (OS) No.1613/2010, for delay in compliance of an order dated 15.10.2012, by which the Court granted permission to the appellant to implead his son as a co-plaintiff. Thereafter, a review application bearing No.IA No.593/2013 was preferred by the appellant, against the order dated 29.10.2013, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by an order dated RFA (OS) 153-13 Page 1 25.11.2013. The present appeal is against both orders dated 29.10.20...
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. Dillip Kumar Samal and anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 25, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2013 W.P.(C) 1546/2013 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Anjali Chauhan and Mr.Rishab Kaushik, Advocates for AIIMS Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Amicus Curiae versus DILLIP KUMAR SAMAL AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Yakesh Anand, Advocate with Ms.Sonam Anand, Mr.Murari Kumar and Mr.Nimit Mathur, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Akshay Chandra, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Keeping in view the importance of the issues which arose for consideration in the writ petition we had appointed Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Advocate as the Amicus Curiae and at the outset we place on record our appreciation for the inputs given by learned Amicus which have helped us in seeing through the cobwebs; not to belittle the able argument...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »