Delhi Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Virendara Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-22-2013
$~25&26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.563/2013 Date of decision:22. d November, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus VIRENDARA KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through Nemo. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.564/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus SHARAD JAIN ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): We feel that the order of the tribunal is just and fair. Rs.20 cores was surrendered as undisclosed income at the time of search and it was agreed that the tax liability should be paid as set out in the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) of Virendara Kumar Gupta. The said statement has been reproduced in the impugned order passed by the tribunal. Subsequently, affidavit of Sarad Jain was filed ...
Ramher Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 20, 2013 + CRL.A. 846/2010 RAMHER Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C), the appellant herein seeks to challenge the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 19.12.2009 and 18.01.2010, passed by the Court of Ld. Additional Sessions Judge-01, West, Delhi, thereby convicting the appellant for committing an offence under Section 376 IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life together with fine in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.2. In ancient times an individuals acts wer...
Harbans Singh Vs. M/S Juggat Pharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2013. % + RFA3452013 & CM No.11394/2013 (for stay) HARBANS SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Yakesh Anand, Mr. Murari Kumar, Mr. Nimit Mathur & Ms. Sonam Anand, Advs. Versus M/S JUGGAT PHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Y. Hari Prasad & Ms. K.V. Bharathi Upadayaya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 18th April, 2013 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-06, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of CS No.453/2012 filed by the appellant consequent to rejection of the plaint on the ground of the suit claim being barred by time and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 being not available to the appellant/plaintiff; it was also observed that the suit was barred by res judicata.2. The appellant/plaintiff had in or about September, 2010 instituted the suit from which this appeal ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Bhavneet Kaur and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. h December, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 717/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Abhishek Kumar and Mr.Vijay Singh, Advocates. Versus BHAVNEET KAUR & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K. Babbar, Amicus Curaie for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the impugned award dated 06.04.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as under:Loss of dependency Loss of consortium Loss of estate Funeral expenses Loss of love and affection Rs.9,00,000/ Rs. 10,000/Rs. 10,000/Rs. 5,000/Rs. 75,000/___________ Rs.10,00,000/Less Interim compensation (-) Rs. 50,000/___________ Rs.9,50,000/___________ Interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum was also awarded from 19.03.2009 till its realization by the learned Tribunal.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has argued that ...
Ravi Crop Science Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h November, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h December, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7449/2012 RAVI CROP SCIENCE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jagmohan Sabharwal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sapra, Adv. versus UOI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. S.K. Dubey, Adv. with Ms. Anandi Mishra, Adv. Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.1. By virtue of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has approached this Court for de-freezing its account held in Citibank, NA, 27 Central Market, Sector II, Western Avenue Road, Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi which has been frozen by Respondent No.2 (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence).2. The Petitioner alleges that there were certain allegations of import of high value pesticides/insecticides in the guise of Sodium Bi-Carbonate against certain firms which led to some investigation by Respondent No.2. It is urged that the Petiti...
Rajbir Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:16. 12.2013 Judgment delivered on:20.12.2013 CRL.A. 526/2008 RAJBIR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashok Kumar Gehlot, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. CRL.A. 861/2008 SHAILESH KUMAR YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ajay Verma and Mr.Shiv Kumar Diwedi, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. + CRL.A. 70/2009 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Bhupesh Narula and Mr.Yash Tandon, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 16.5.2008 and 24.5.2008 whereby accused Ashok Kumar and Shailesh Kumar Yadav had been convicted under Sections 302/365/201 read with Section 120-B as also under Section 396 of the IPC. For the aforenoted convictions the accused wer...
Delhi Power Company Ltd. Vs. K.L. Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: December 20, 2013 + CM(M) 914/2010 & C.M. No.12550/2010 DELHI POWER COMPANY LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Adv. with Mr.Kartikeya Bhargava, Adv. versus KL SHARMA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.B.B.Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Sarthak Ghonkrokta, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Anjan Sinha, proxy counsel for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/judgment debtor has assailed order dated 26th February, 2010 passed by the learned Executing Court in an execution petition whereby the objections raised by the petitioner were dismissed.2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent No.1/decree holder had filed a suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) and three employees of the DVB. At the time of filing the said s...
Subiman Kundu Vs. the Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8204/2013 & CM173082013 (Stay) 20th December, 2013 ..... Petitioner % SUBIMAN KUNDU Through: Ms. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj and Dr. Sumat Bhardwaj, Advs. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr. Dinesh Sharma and Ms. Ritika Jhurani, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the action of the respondent no.3/Indian Institute of Technology/employer whereby a punishment of removal from service of the respondent no.4 was proposed initially, and later on an order of censure with deferred appointment was passed by the disciplinary authority, the same has now been withdrawn after re-consideration.2. I put it to counsel for the petitioner that how does the petitioner have locus standi with respect to disciplinary proc...
Dr. Meenakshi Gupta Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8145/2013 20th December, 2013 % DR. MEENAKSHI GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitin Dhaiya, Advocate. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.17190/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.8145/2013 and C.M. No.17189/2013 (stay) 1. Some petitioners insist on abusing process of law. This is one such petitioner. An earlier writ petition was filed being W.P.(C) No.6799/2013 which was withdrawn after arguments because no case was W.P.(C) No.8145/2013 page 1 of 3 made out. No case was made out because appointment of the petitioner as Vice-Principal was without the approval of the governing body, and accordingly the appointment of the petitioner as Vice-Principal was withdrawn. No fresh petition can be file...
Bhulley Singh Vs. State N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : October 01, 2013 DECIDED ON : December 20, 2013 + CRL.A. 716/2000 BHULLEY SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Advocate with Mr.Kishore Kumar & Mr.Imran Ahmad, Advocates versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney APP for the State. + CRL.A. 754/2000 ARUN KUMAR @ MUNNA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney APP for the State. + CRL.A. 648/2000 AVDESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.D.Rana, Advocate. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney APP for the State. + CRL.A. 681/2000 SURESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney APP for the State. + CRL.A. 651/2000 VIMAL CHANDRA ..... App...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »