Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd Jameel vs the Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1354/2026 with CM APPL. 6713-6714/2026 MOHD JAMEEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anash & Mr. Ayaz Ahmed, Advocates.versusTHE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kumar Shashwat Singh Sawna, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr. Abhishek Khanna, SPC for R-3. Mr. M. Hasibuddin, Advocate for R-4 & 5. Ms. Gracey Sachdeva, Advocate for R-6. Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate for R-7.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 6714/2026 (seeking exemption from filing certified copies of documents)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1354/20262. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondents no.1 to 3 to take action against the unauthorized construction at plot admeasuring 304 square yards in Kh. No. 376, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, New Delhi carried out by the respondents no.4 to ...
Jatin Prasad vs State(Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4884/2025 JATIN PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Manan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Uditi Bali, Mr. Karmanya Singh Chaudhary, Mr. Kartik G. and Mr. Shiv Manan, Advocates.versusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Sanjeet Singh, P.S.: EoW. Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Mr. Navish Bhati and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocates for Complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 02.02.2026CRL.M.A. 37666/2025 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. BAIL APPLN. 4884/2025 By way of the present petition filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.50/2024 dated 16.05.2024 registered under sections 419/420/467/468/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Economic Offences Wing, Delhi.2. Notice on this petition was issued on 17.1...
Trilok Chand vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4925/2025 TRILOK CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Mehley, Ms. Harshita Kumar, Mr. Sajal Manchanda and Mr. Varun Garg, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP for the State with SI Rohit ANTF, Crime BranchCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 02.02.20261. By way of the instant application, the applicant seeks grant of regularbail in case arising out of FIR bearing No. 0270/2024, registered at Police Station Crime Branch, North District, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 22(C)/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter NDPS Act).2. The brief facts of the present case are that on 25.12.2024, at about03:30 PM, a secret informer conveyed information to the police team of ANTF, Crime Branch that Salman and Samaludden @ Sadiq were involved in the illegal supply of narcotic and psychotropic substa...
Rita Segan & Ors. vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 307/2009 RITA SEGAN & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Vinod Gaur and Mr. Mahender Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 6708/2026 (For Withdrawal of the appeal by appellants) & FAO 307/20091. By way of present application, the applicants/appellants seek towithdraw the present appeal as the parties have been able to reach an amicable settlement vide settlement agreement dated 15.10.2025 before the Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi.2. In view of the above, the application is allowed and the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The settlement agreement dated 15.10.2025 is taken on record and parties are made bound by the terms of the Agreement..3. The appeal and the application are disposed of accordingly. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rdThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be ...
Sh Jaibir Singh vs Mahender Singh (Deceased) Through Lrs and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RSA 24/2025 & CM APPL. 7349/2025 SH JAIBIR SINGH .....Appellant Through: NoneversusMAHENDER SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Yashvi Garg, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Ms. Alka Pruthi, Mr. Ashu Kumar, Mr. Vikas Saini, Mr. Kawalpreet Singh, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Madesiya, Mr. Mahaveer Singh, Mr. Manmohan Jha, and Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.02.20261. None is present on behalf of the Appellant.2. Present Appeal alongwith pending Application, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026 NThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 13:12:30...
Vikas Rathi Through Parokar vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4993/2025 & CRL.M.A. 38437/2025 VIKAS RATHI THROUGH PAROKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Balram, Ms. Arushi Mittal, Mr. Ashwani and Mr. Apurva Sharma, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. IO/SI Pooja, P.S.: Ranjit Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 02.02.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present bail petition with liberty to file afresh at the appropriate stage in accordance with law. The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/hb This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2026 at 12:29:14...
Nisha Bhasin vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5035/2025 & CRL.M.As. 38739/2025 39000/2025 NISHA BHASIN .....Applicant Through: Mr. Manohar Lal and Mr. Chaitanya Rohilla, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Ashish Mahani, Mr. Bhuman and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep K. Yadav, Mr. Abhishek Singh and Mr. Aman Singh, Advocates for R-CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 02.02.20261. Pursuant to the last order, learned counsel for the applicant has handed over a Demand Draft dated 29.01.2026 bearing No.500017 of Rs.5,00,000/- to the complainant who is present in person in Court today.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the applicant today is also willing to pay/ clear the remaining outstanding amount to the complainant, however, she does not have the means to do the same immediately.3. Per Contra, learned APP appearing for the State opposing thepres...
Dhiraj Moti Ajwani vs Ashimara Housing Private Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 94/2026 DHIRAJ MOTI AJWANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanskar Saraf, Advocate.versusASHIMARA HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samyak Jain, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Mr. Sanskar Saraf, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh after giving proper notice in terms of Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/jgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 12:19:35...
Param Natt vs Kuldeep Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~15, 16 and 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 1955/2015 PARAM NATT .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal Mishra, Advocates.versusKULDEEP SINGH & ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates for D-1 & D-3. Mr. U.A. Rana and Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for D-2. Ms. A. Dhingra and Mr. Akash Yadav, Advocates for D-4 to D-6. + TEST.CAS. 68/2015 & I.A. 14729/2015 RAJINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. U.A. Rana & Mr.Himanshu Mehta, Advocates.versusSTATE OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates for R-2 and R-4. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal Mishra, Advocates for R-3. + TEST.CAS. 76/2015 & I.A. 14286/2019 SHRI PRABJOT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates.versusSTATE & OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. U.A. Rana & Mr.Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for R-4. Ms. Aastha Dhawan and Mr. Avichal M...
CLIX Capital Services Pvt Ltd vs V and L Diagnostic Centre Llp & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 194/2026 CLIX CAPITAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Nehra, Mr. Puneet Raj, Mr. Ravi Shankar Garg, Ms. Akanksha Maheshwari, AdvocatesversusV AND L DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE LLP & ORS. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 02.02.2026 I.A. 2292/2026 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB.P. 194/2026 & I.A. 2293/20261. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties.2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the present Petition, on the ground that the Petitioner has not served the notice mandated under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to the Respondents.3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.4. Liberty is granted to the Petitione...