Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Singer India Ltd vs Late Sh. Jagmohan Singh Kohli. (Deceased & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 155/2026 SINGER INDIA LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepanshu Nagar, Adv.versusLATE SH. JAGMOHAN SINGH KOHLI. (DECEASED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Thomas, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 26.02.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(5) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [in short, Act] seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties under the Dealership/Distributorship Agreement dated 29.11.2023 executed between the petitioner and respondent no.2. The agreement provides for resolution of disputes by arbitration. Clause 21 of the said agreement is arbitration clause.2. The disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide notice dated 13.09.2025, which did not elicit any response.3. Mr. Thomas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 does not dispute the arbitration...
Ravinder Nath Sahni & Ors. vs State G.N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~20 & 23* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1001/2026 STATE G.N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. + W.P.(CRL) 26/2026 THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 229/2026 (exemption) in W.P.(CRL) 26/20261. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 1001/2026 & W.P.(CRL) 26/20263. By way of these petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of two FIRs,i.e. FIR bearing no. 449/2023, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections FIR bearing no. 461/2024, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/506/509/34 of the IPC.4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified b...
Vishnu Dayal vs State & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 251/2008 VISHNU DAYAL .....Appellant Through: None.versusSTATE & ORS .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 26.02.20261. None appears for the parties.2. It is noted that when the matter was taken up on 11.12.2025, thisCourt, upon noticing the absence of the parties as well as their counsels, posted the matter for 18.12.2025. However, on 18.12.2025 as well, none was present on behalf of the parties. Noticing the same, this Court directed the Registry to serve a copy of the order upon the counsels appearing for the parties and posted the matter for 08.01.2026. On 08.01.2026, again, none appeared for any of the parties and, on that date, Court notice was directed to be issued to the learned counsels for the parties. As per the office report, the Court notice has been served upon the counsels for the parties as well as respondent No. 3. However, there is no appearance on behalf of the partie...
M/S. Daani Enterprises vs Joint Commissioner Directorate General of Go ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1457/2026 & CM APPL. 7102/2026 M/S. DAANI ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Anjali Jha Manish and Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Advs.versusJOINT COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX INTELLIGENCE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Dipak Raj, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 26.02.20261. The counsel for the petitioner has specifically relied on the Circular dated 08th February, 2024, which is in the form of guidelines issued to the Investigating Officer.2. It is the claim of the petitioner that the very investigation was uncalled for, as the petitioner itself is not the end-user.3. The counsel for the petitioner has claimed that the petitioner is in possession of material, so as to demonstrate the aforesaid fact, and also that the benefits were duly availed of in accordance with law.4. The aforesaid issues can be broug...
Veena Singh vs Satej Kumar Bajaj Alias Kumar Bajaj Alias Satej Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 441/2026, CM APPL. 13083/2026 & CM APPL. 13084/2026 VEENA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Harkauli and Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Advocates.versusSATEJ KUMAR BAJAJ ALIAS KUMAR BAJAJ ALIAS SATEJ KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain defects in the present petition and accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh petition.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/tp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Por...
Praksh Chand Jain vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 391/2007 PRAKSH CHAND JAIN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Rao, Advocates along with Mr. Hemant Jain.versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Tripathi, Mr. Vasudev Pal and Mr. Naithar Tripura, Advocates for respondent nos. 2(iii), 2 (1-c), 2 (1-a) and 2 (1-b). Mr. Abhinav Garg, Panel Counsel for GNCTD/respondent no.1. Ms. Rhea Jain, Advocate for respondent no.2 with respondent no.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13108/2026 (For disposal of the present appeal in terms of the family settlement dated 24.12.2025)1. By way of the present joint application filed under Order XXIII Rule3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the parties seek disposal of the present appeal in terms of the Family Settlement dated 24.12.2025 arrived at between them.2. In the application, it is stated that the property bearing No. 5359, Laddoo Ghati, Paharga...
M/S Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt Ltd vs Nakshatra Distilleries & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 803/2016 & I.As. 8008/2016, 10289/2016 M/S ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS LTD. .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shrawan Chopra, Mr. Achyut Tewari, Ms. Krisha Baweja and Mr. Parth Malhotra, Advocates.versusNAKSHATRA DISTILLERIES & BREWERIES LTD .....Defendant Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 26.02.20261. This suit is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree ofpermanent injunction restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiffs trademark Officers Choice and passing off. Reliefs of copyright, dilution, unfair competition, damages, delivery up etc., are also sought.2. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that impugned three labels, details of which are furnished in paragraph 27 of the plaint, are not being used by the Defendant and she has instructions to withdraw the suit.3. Suit along with pending applications is disposed of as withdrawn. JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 S.Sharma...
National Highways Authority of India vs Simplex Infrastructure Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 348/2017 & I.A. 10657/2017 (For Stay) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naman Saraswat & Ms. Neetica Sharma, Advs.versusSIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 26.02.2026 I.A. 5360/2026 (For withdrawal of Petition)1. The present application has been filed under Section 151 of the Civil Procedural Code, 1908 on behalf of the Petitioner seeking withdrawal of O.M.P. (COMM) 348/2017.2. It is averred that such withdrawal is sought on the ground thatthe parties to the present proceedings have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 21.11.2025 (Annexed as Document1A), setting out the terms and conditions governing the settlement.3. Having regard to the averments made in the application and theterms embodied in the said Settlement Agreement, this Court allows t...
Ram General Insurace Company vs Jafruddin & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 891/2017 RAM GENERAL INSURACE COMPANY .....Appellant Through: None.versusJAFRUDDIN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Ms. Shivangi Singh, Advocates for R1 (through VC) Mr. Manoj Ranjan Sinha, Mr. Vishal Agrawal, Advocates for R-3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 26.02.20261. No one appears on behalf of appellant/Insurance Company.2. Even on the last two dates, no one has appeared for appellant/Insurance Company.3. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.4. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ak/spThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:14:48...
Santosh vs the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 130/2026 SANTOSH .....Applicant Through: Mr. Suraj Prakash Sharma, Advocate versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates with SI Kartar Singh Rawat, Anti Narcotics Cell CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 25.02.20261. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application since the chargesheet has been filed yesterday before the learned Trial Court. 2. As such, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 25, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 12:13:05...