Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Baby Nisagra Through Her Father Mr. Chinnappa S vs Sh. Ashok Kumar Sin ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 331/2026BABY NISAGRA THROUGH HER FATHER MR. CHINNAPPA S.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.versusSH. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms. Lolita D. Crasta, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 24.04.2026 CM APPL.27147/2026 (for directions)1. Issue notice.2. Learned counsel, as aforesaid, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.He seeks some time to take instructions.3. List on 26.05.2026.SACHIN DATTA, JAPRIL 24, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:31:28...
Kshetrimayum Chandrakumar (President of Proposed Political Party (Mani ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2672/2026KSHETRIMAYUM CHANDRAKUMAR (PRESIDENT OFPROPOSED POLITICAL PARTY (MANIPUR PEOPLESALLIANCE) .....Petitioner Through: Advocate (appearance not given).versusELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, standing counsel for ECI with Mr. Siddhartha Goswami, Ms. Geetanjali Reddy and Mr. Aditya Sachdeva, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 25.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed highlighting the inaction ofthe respondent/ Election Commission of India (ECI) in respect of the application for registration of a political party filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is the president of the proposed political party, on 7th February, 2025.2. Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/ECI on advance notice, submits that in response to the said application, a communication dated 10th September, 2025 has already been sent to the petitione...
Save India Foundation (Regd.) vs Executive Engineer, Dda & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2612/2026, CM APPL. 12712/2026 & CM APPL.SAVE INDIA FOUNDATION (REGD.) .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. Umesh Chandra Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. MK Gaur, Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Mr. Peeyush Kaushik, Mr. Neeraj Chauhan, Ms. Khushbu Khatri & Mr. Lalit Goyal, Advocates. Mr. Varun Goswami, Ms. Farhat Jahan Rehmani, Mr. Imaran Ahmed, Mr. Firoz Iqbal Khan, Ms. Fatima Praveen, Ms. Muskan Ali and Ms. Dakshita Sharma, Advocates for the Applicant.versusEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DDA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, GP, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal and Mr. Kushagra Malik, Advocates for UoI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAW.P.(C) 2612/2026 Page 1 of 3ORDER% 25.02.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. ShobhanaTakiar, learned Sta...
Azad Khan vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 670/2026 AZAD KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Advocate(DHCLSC).versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State. SI Anita, P.S. Keshav Puram.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 25.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner impugns order dated 09.01.2026, whereby his application seeking parole has been rejected by the jail authorities; and seeks parole for a period of 04 weeks.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that thepetitioners application seeking parole has been rejected based on Rule 1210(II) of the Delhi Prison Rules 2018, namely that according to the jail authorities, the petitioners conduct has not been uniformly good for the last 02 years before the date of ap...
Subhash Gulati & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1527/2026, CRL.M.A. 6195/2026, CRL.M.A. 6196/2026 SUBHASH GULATI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aadarsh Kothari and Mr. Utpal Sharma, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mahela, APP for State. SI Sunil Kumar, P.S. Ranjit Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 25.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of their Application dated 14.08.2024 filed under section 175(3) of the BNSS that is pending before the learned Magistrate.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits, that thepetitioners are about 92 years old and have been constrained to file the aforementioned application seeking registration of an FIR against their son, daughter-in-law and certain officials...
Bimla Devi vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Through Its S ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2633/2026 and CM APPL. 12790/2026 BIMLA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Rohilla, Mr. Pradeep Yadav, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Mr. Aman Singh, Advs. with Petitioner in-person.versusDELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARDTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 25.02.20261. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner assails thecorrectness of the order dated 06.11.2025 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal], whereby the Miscellaneous Application (MA) bearing No.4743/2025, filed by the Petitioner seeking restoration of her Original Application (OA) No.1191/2015, was dismissed.2. Though the Tribunal ha...
Surendra Daulet Singh & Ors. vs Jitendra Daulet Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (MISC.) 7/2026 & I.A. 5201/2026 SURENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.versusJITENDRA DAULET SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B.L.N Sanjit, Adv. for R- 1 to 4 (through VC). Mr. Vedant Kapur, Adv. for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 25.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one year.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026/JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown abov...
Jaya Shruthi R Through Her Next Friend and Natural Mother Mrs. Pavithr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 329/2026JAYA SHRUTHI R THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND ANDNATURAL MOTHER MRS. PAVITHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.versusSH. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, IAS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Parikshit Singh Bhati and Ms. Lolita D. Crasta, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 24.04.2026 CM APPL.27328/2026 (for directions)1. Issue notice.2. Learned counsel, as aforesaid, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.He seeks some time to take instructions.3. List on 26.05.2026.SACHIN DATTA, JAPRIL 24, 2026/clThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:31:30...
Shri Bhagwan vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2611/2026 SHRI BHAGWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Akhil Rexwal and Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocates.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Standing Counsel with Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Mr. Aryaman Vaccher and Ms. Khusbhoo Mittal, Advocates forGNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 25.02.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. SameerVashisht, the learned Standing Counsel, representing the Respondents.2. This Public Interest Litigation petition raises certain concerns aboutthe consolidation proceedings held in respect of a Village Rawta in the year 2000-2002, wherein, according to the Petitioner, the public passage bearing Khasra No. 37/9, which was commonly known as Rawta-Badsa Road, was removed from the Sizra / Map of the said Village, though it was duly recorded in the earlier consolidation records of ...
Nous Brand Solutions Pvt Ltd vs Raheja Developers Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 198/2026 & I.A. 5284/2026 NOUS BRAND SOLUTIONS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra Nath Pareek, Adv.versusRAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Gurtejpal Singh, Mr. Rohan Anand & Ms. Kholi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 25.02.20261. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that a moratorium underSection 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is operating.2. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner isnot pressing the petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh as soon as the moratorium ends.3. The petition stands disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayedfor. Pending application stands disposed of.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR cod...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »