Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 662/2022, CRL.M.A. 20578/2022 PRADEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Ekta, P.S.: Sector-23, Dwarka.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 26.02.2026 Mr. Vikram Aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, submitting that the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial court. The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ak This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:10:20...
Sonu vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14630/2023 SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishu Kajaria, Advocate. (through VC)versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Ankur Mittal CGSC with Mr.Hrithik Saxena, Advocate for R-2 and 3 along with Mr.kamal Sharma, SI, Maidan GariCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a) Issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari thereby for issuing necessary directions to the respondent No.1 to 3 to take necessary action against the respondent No.4 for arresting /detaining /restraining the petitioner illegally and putting him in lock-up illegally; and b) Issue directions to the respondent No. 1 to 3 to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- to the petitioner for his illegal arrest/detention / restrainment of the petitioner at the hands of the respondent No.4 and the amount so awarded ordered to be recovered from the salary of the res...
M/S Vyas C Kakar & Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs Ashwini Kumar Shahu
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 454/2013 and CM APPL. 9925/2013 M/S VYAS C KAKAR & CO. PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through:versusASHWINI KUMAR SHAHU .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 26.02.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. There has been no appearance on behalf of the appellant on the last two dates of hearing.2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default and non- prosecution.C. HARI SHANKAR, J.OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/yg Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:27.02.2026 15:11:00...
Manish Saluja vs Ruchi Khanna
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 651/2022, CM APPL. 54366/2022 & CM APPL. 53019/2023 MANISH SALUJA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anish Kumar Maggo and Mr. Karan Chopra, Advocates.versusRUCHI KHANNA .....Respondent Through: Mr. M. K. Sharma and Ms. Vishakha Sharma, Advocates with Respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 26.02.20261. The main Appellant Shri Manish Saluja has exired and his LegalHeirs namely Neelam Saluja wife, Garv Saluja son and Sujal Saluja Minor son through the mother Neelam Saluja, have been impleaded and the amded Memo of Parties has been filed.2. The parties have entered into Memorandum of Settlement dated09.02.2026 which is signed by both the parties, wherein it has been agreed by the Respondent/ Plaintiff that on account of demise of Manish Saluja, who owed the money and their long standing relationship, the Respondent has agreed to forego recovery of any money under the Decree dated 30.04.2022. The pa...
Amit vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13041/2025 AMIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Khurana (DHCLSC), Mr. Shiven Khurana, Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley (CGSC) Mr. Akshay Sharma (Adv.)Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi (Adv.) Mr. Varun Pratap Singh (Adv.) Mr. Yogya Bhatia (Adv.) ASA Padma Kumar (FRRO)CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. In paragraph nos.8 to 10 of the counter affidavit, the followingposition has been taken by the respondent: 8. Without prejudice to the above, the Respondents deem it essential to highlight the background pertaining to grant of visa, blacklisting and upgradation of blacklisting of the Petitioner's wife- Ms. Zakhro Solieva. She had arrived in India on the strength of an Uzbek Passport No. FA0634295 and Indian medical Visa bearing no. VK742044, which was valid till 25.04.2021. Her Visa was last extended by the FRRO till 21.01.2022. S...
Madhu Food Products vs Surya Processed Food Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3115/2024 MADHU FOOD PRODUCTS .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusSURYA PROCESSED FOOD PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. P.C. Arya, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous, as the disputes between the parties have been settled and the main suit has already been disposed of. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present petition may be disposed of.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code sh...
Bellator Media Private Limited vs the Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 39/2025 BELLATOR MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Bhatia, Ms. Sakshi Jain, Ms. Rishika Aggarwal, Mr. Ritik Raghuwanshi and Ms. Shrudula Murthy, Advocates.versusTHE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Om Ram and Ms. Nikita Singh, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 26.02.20261. This appeal is filed on behalf of Appellant under Section 91 of The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (1999 Act) challenging the impugned order dated 28.03.2025 passed by the Respondent, whereby Trademark Application bearing No. 570022 for registration of the in Class 41 has been refused.2. Appellant filed TM-A application on 28.11.2022 for registration oftrademark in Class 41. On 14.06.2023, Examination Report was issued raising objections under Section 9(1)(b) and 11(1) of 1999 Act, to which Appellant filed a reply on 24.06.2023...
Mahesh Batra vs Lalit Saini & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 271/2025 & CM APPL. 55437-38/2025 MAHESH BATRA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusLALIT SAINI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yogesh Gaur & Ms. Seema Sahni, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25 (B) 5 of the DRC Act, 1958,seeks the following prayers:- In view of above and contents of documents annexed, the petitioner prays to this Honble Court to set aside the Order dated 09.06.2025 passed in RC ARC NO 13/2023 by The Court of Ms. Priyadarshini, LD. Senior Civil Judge cum - RC, East District, Karkardooma Court, Delhi Order Dated 09.96.2025 passed by Ms. Priyadarshini, Ld. Senior Civil Judge cum Rent Controller, Karkardooma Court, Delhi and to allow the application for seeking leave to defend of the petitioner in the Interest of Justice.Any other relief/relief's which this Honble court deems fit a...
Jeet Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RC.REV. 709/2019 & CM APPL. 55596/2019 JEET KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusMAHESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 25-B (8) of Delhi Rent Control Act,seeks the following prayers:- a) call for the records from the court of Shri Ajay Nagar, Addl. Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi of the case titled as "Mahesh Kumar Vs. Jeet Kumar" being the file of Eviction Petition bearing No. 65/2017;b) set aside the impugned order dated 04.09.2019 passed by Shri Ajay Nagar, Addl. Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari, Delhi in case titled as "Mahesh Kumar Vs. Jeet Kumar" in Eviction Petition being E. No.65/2017, whereby, Ld. Addl. Rent Controller dismisse d the leave to defend application of the Petitioner and allowed the eviction petition of...
Raj Kumar Singh vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 100/2020 RAJ KUMAR SINGH .....Appellant Through: None.versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Vikas, PS Kalyanpuri.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 26.02.20261. This appeal has been filed by the informant/ the aggrievedin SC No. 2682/16 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, East, Karkardooma Court, Delhi aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused persons of the offences punishable under Sections 452, 448, 342, 506 read with Section 34 IPC2. As per the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C, the appeal will have to be filed before the Sessions Court concerned.3. Therefore, the appeal is sent to the Sessions Court concerned.4. The appellant shall appear before the Sessions Court on 23.03.2026. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 kd...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »