Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.L. Electromech Pvt. Ltd. vs Punjab and Sind Bank & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 197/2026 S.L. ELECTROMECH PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivekanand, Adv.versusPUNJAB AND SIND BANK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Shersia, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 25.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one year.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026/PaThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:39:15...
Kuldeep Saini vs Chanchal Saini
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1543/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6244-6245/2026 KULDEEP SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Onkar Roy, Advocate.versusCHANCHAL SAINI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 25.02.20261. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for thepetitioner, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present petition.2. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.3. Pending application also stands disposed of.MANOJ JAIN, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026st/pbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:06:03...
Shri Ram Techno Engineering Private Limited & Anr. vs Union of India & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 416/2026SHRI RAM TECHNO ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED &ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Mahima Ahuja, Ms. Saumya Gupta and Ms. Sanya C. Oberoi, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, CGSC with Mr. Kumar Kartikeya, Mr Dhananjay Singh and Mr. Chanakya Kene., Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr Vinay Kaushik Government Pleader Mr. Sumesh Dhiman, Mr. Praful Jindal, Mr,. agar Thakkar, Advs. ForR-2Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma. RPMs. Eshna Kumar, Ms. Astha Agarwal & Mr. M Poudiuwibou, Advs. For CoC Mr. Mohit Choudhary, Mr. K. Sachedva, Mr. Lakshay Yadav, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Mr. Prakhar Mithal for the Respondent No. 4Mr. Samrat Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sai Balaji, Adv.Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Adhish Srivastava, Ms. Mahima Chauhan & Mr. Kritika Singh, Advs. for R-5 & 6CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 25.02.20261. Afte...
S T Products Through Its Proprietor Mr Sushil Tripathi vs Borsad Tobac ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO(OS) (COMM) 39/2026, CM APPL. 12870/2026, CMAPPL. 12871/2026 & CM APPL. 12872/2026S T PRODUCTS THROUGH ITSPROPRIETOR MR SUSHIL TRIPATHI .....AppellantThrough: Mr. Pranav Prasoon, Mr. Harish Kumar, Mr. Abhinav Anand, Mr. Sarthak Gaurav, Advs.versusBORSAD TOBACCO COMPANYPRIVATE LIMITED .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Jaya Negi and Ms. Yashi Agrawal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 25.02.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. After some hearing, Mr. Pranav Prasoon, learned Counsel forappellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal as he submits that he would move an application before the learned Single Judge underOrder XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seekingvacation of the order under challenge.2. Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid, without expressingany opinion on the merits of the matter.Signed By:GUNN FAO(OS) (COMM) 39/2026 P...
Riya Balhara(Through Spa Holder) Mr. Parvesh Kumar) vs State of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 123/2026, CRL.M.A. 6298/2026, CRL.M.A. 6299/2026RIYA BALHARA(THROUGH SPA HOLDER) MR. PARVESHKUMAR) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mahela, APP for State. Inspector M.S. Kamal, DIU/Rohini Distt. Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Mr. Paritosh Dhawan, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 25.02.2026 After making some submissions in the matter, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JFEBRUARY 25, 2026V.RawatThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02...
Mohd Bilal and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1531/2026 MOHD BILAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr. Satish Kumar and Mr. Daljeet Singh, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State. R-2 with her counsel Mr. Aditya Kale, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 25.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing ofFIR bearing no. 1164/2023, dated 23.09.2023, registered at Police Station Burari, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court inperson and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Burari, Delhi.3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage betweenpetitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 25.05.2020 as per the Muslim ri...
Tony @ Vikas vs the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 807/2026 TONY @ VIKAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K K Vijay, Adv.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Divyang Kishwan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 25.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6208/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.BAIL APPLN. 807/20263. By way of the present application, the applicant is seeking grant ofregular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 526/2024, registered at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1)/3(5) of the the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter 'BNS') and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.4. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.5. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on 10.07.2024,PCR cal...
Aakash Khokhar vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 673/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6250/2026 AAKASH KHOKHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atin Chadha, Mr. Harjas Singh, Ms. Munisha Chadha, Mr. Dhruv Tomar, Ms. Rekha Yadav, Ms. Aeshana Singh, Mr. Shray Bhushan, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Shubham Goyal and Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh, Advocates with SI Pankaj Kumar, PS: Jyoti Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 25.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: a) Direct transfer of investigation in FIR No. 415/2022 from Police Station Jyoti Nagar to the Crime Branch or any other independent and competent Agency /department of Delhi Police, other than PS Jyoti Nagar, to ensur...
Mukesh Kumar vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2645/2026 CM APPL. 12867/2026 CM APPL. 12868/2026 MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratnesh Sharma, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh K Mishra, CGSC, UOI, Mr. Sundarlal, AC-CISF, Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Insp-CISF, Mr. Manjunath, SI-CISF, Mr. Shrey Sharma, Mr. Anubhav Upadhyay, Mr. Akshay Yadav, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 25.02.2026 CM APPL. 12867/2026 (for exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of.W.P.(C) 2645/20263. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:I Issue a writ, order or direction(s) in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ quashing and setting aside the impugned Office Order bearing S. No. 42099/CSIF/TAJ/CO/Admin/2026-748 dated 07.02.2026 whereby the Petitioner has been transferred/relieved from Taj Mahal Unit,...
Rajeev Gupta vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2669/2026 & CM APPL. 12997/2026, CM APPL. RAJEEV GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Garg, Adv. Mr Yash Gaiha, AdvversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Adv. Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra & Adv. Ms. Aditi Desai for R1 Mr Santosh Kumar Rout, SC for R2&6 Mr. Ankit Raj (SC) with Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan (Adv.) Mr. Digvijay Singh (Adv.) for PNB Mr. Rajiv Kapur, SC for SBI along with Mr. Akshit Kapur, AoR/ for R3 Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Deepanjal Choudhary, Ms. Likivi K Jhakalu and Ms. Azal Aekram, Advocates for R7CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 25.02.2026CM APPL. 12998/2026Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 2669/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- A. Issue appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari or directions/order quashing and setting aside the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »