Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T D Arora & Ors. vs Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3392/2021, CM APPL. 10326/2021 and CM APPL. 41130-41131/2025T D ARORA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Upadhyay and Ms. Usha Yadav, Advocates.versusNCT OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks liberty towithdraw the instant petition.2. Liberty, so prayed for, is granted.3. The instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn along with allpending applications.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026Nc/ksrThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:59:14...
Mala Lama vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1193/2025 MALA LAMA .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 17.03.2026CRL.M.A. 8070/2026 (For rectification of order dated 26.02.2026)1. In the name of rectification of order dated 26.02.2026, what issought by the counsel is to mark his appearance on behalf of complainant de facto in order dated 26.02.2026.2. Since there is no way to ascertain presence of the counsel on that dayand there is no adverse order against the complainant de facto, coupled with the fact that none appears today also in support of the application, the application is dismissed.GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MARCH 17, 2026 rsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Serv...
Aatmnirbhar Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. vs Yash Pal Batra and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 371/2024AATMNIRBHAR INFRATECH PVT. LTD. AND ANR......Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Akash Kumar & Mr. Mahender Rathour, Advs.versusYASH PAL BATRA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.P Agrawal, Mr. Chandan Kumar Jha & Mr. Nimish Kuma Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions,seeks leave to withdraw the present petition in view of the disputes between the parties having been amicably resolved by way of a Settlement Agreement dated 24.02.2026.2. A photocopy of the said Settlement Agreement has been handedover across the Bar and is taken on record.3. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition, along with allpending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/v/krThis is a digitally sig...
Anand Gaur vs Suman @ Maina
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 184/2020 ANAND GAUR .....PetitionerversusSUMAN @ MAINA .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt ofCourts Act seeks the following prayers: i. Initiate appropriate contempt of court proceedings against thecontemnor for disobeying the joint statement made, on and orderdated 15.10.2019 by the Hon'ble.Court of Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain, Principal Judge Family Courts, Rohini Delhi in HMA No. ii. Any other orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be passed in favour of the applicant and against the contemnor;3. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.4. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the last dates ofhearing, i.e., 01.11.2023, 24.04.2024, 21.08.2024, 04.12.2024, 23.07.2025, 24.11.2025 as well.5. In view of the a...
Ion Exchange (India) Ltd vs IIC Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) 2/2020 & I.A. 15508/2025, I.A. 32517/2025 ION EXCHANGE (INDIA) LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijaykumar and Mr. Naman Garg, AdvocatesversusIIC LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Jain, Ms. Aastha Tiwari, Mr Sunny Verma, Advs. for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw thepresent petition.2. Permission, as sought for, is granted.3. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with pendingapplication(s), if any.SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 S. ZakirThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:20:35...
Kamal Kumar & Ors. vs Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri National Sanskrit Unive ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5305/2025 KAMAL KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Pranjal Abrol, Advocate (Through video conferencing)versusSHRI LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI NATIONAL SANSKRIT UNIVERSITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vibhakar Mishra, Ms. Anushka Mishra and Ms. Sumedha Singh, Advocates (Through video conferencing)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 26.02.20261. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition as the petition has become infructuous.2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. AMIT BANSAL, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 dsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 13:14:46...
Sh Dalip Kumar vs Smt Madhu
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4089/2024 & CRL.M.A. 15558-59/2024 SH DALIP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSMT MADHU .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter was taken up for hearing.2. It is already 12.55 PM.3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.4. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith pending application i.e. CRL.M.A. 15558-59/2024 stands dismissed for non-prosecution.5. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ns/ A.P.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:41:44...
1 Moon Light Propbuild Private Limited & Anr vs 1 Insolvency and Bankr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8428/2021 & CM APPL. 53930/2024 1 MOON LIGHT PROPBUILD PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Ridhima Verma with Mr. Shashwat Tripathi, Ms. Madhu Ayachit & Ms. Aparajita Singh, Advs.versus1 INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Saraswat, Advocate for R2 and R4.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. The controversy involved in the instant petition stands covered by the decision of this Court in Anil Goel v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.1 Accordingly, the petitioner is also entitled for the same relief.2. Let the respondents to supply a copy of the reasons for closure of the petitioners complaint.3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.4. The petitioners thereafter shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/tr/amgOrd...
Avdesh Yadav & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4052/2024, CRL.M.A. 15436/2024 & CRL.M.A. 15437/2024 AVDESH YADAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State. Mr.Sunil Upadhyay and Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Yadav, Advs for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners, when the case was taken up at 01:00 PM. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications also stand disposed of.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026/A/RThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 ...
Amit Kakkar vs Directorate General of Health Services Govt of Nct of D ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8973/2025 and CM APPL. 38316/2025 AMIT KAKKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam, Advocate.versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HEALTH SERVICES GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat with Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms Aliza Alam & Mr Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. for R1. Mr. Kapil K. Nayyar, Advocate for R2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioner is being extended appropriate treatment by respondent no.2. The said position is not disputed by the petitioner. At this point of time, there does not remain any unresolved grievance.2. The petition is therefore disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.3. Liberty stands reserved to take appropriate action in case subsequent cause arises. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 26, 2026 tr/amgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Po...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »