Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Thavasiyappan vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Crl. M.P. No.1318 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.Sr.No.3611 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.Dispense with ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 30.01.2026 mrn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Subha Vs The Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR in W.P.No.15575 of 2023 K.Subha ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Union of India Rep by its secretary, Home Affairs, New Delhi2. The Director General of Police Central Reserve Police force, NGO complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi3. The Additional Director of Police South Zone, O/o, The Special, DG South Zone, Telangana, Hyderabad-054. The Inspector General of Police Gayathri Hills, Southern Sector, Telangana-500 0335. The Deputy Inspector General of PoliceCentral Reserve Police force, Avadi, Group Centre, Chennai-600 065 Page1 of 5 .Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. D.Rajagopal For Respondent(s): M/S. DR.S. PADMA, SPC FOR R1 TO R5ORDERThis miscellaneous petition is filed to fix an early date to hear W.P.No.15575 of 2023 and pass orders. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition.3. It is to be noted that the writ petition in W.P.N...
M.Mani vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.2816 & 2818 of 2026 M.Mani ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.2. The Executive Engineer PWD.,WRO., Lower Pennaiyur Basin Division, Villupuram.3. The Engineer in -Chief and Chief Engineer(General), Office of the Engineer in-Chief and Chief Engineer (General), PWD, WRO, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.554/EA1/2020 dated 18.12.2020 quash the same as illegal arbitrary void and non-est in the eye of law, and consequently direct the first and second respondents to confer and disburse all notional service benefits monetary Page1 of 7benefits, terminal benefits and all other attendant and...
M/S.Ame Agrotech vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.AME AGROTECH, Rep. by its Managing Partner, M.Selvaraj, No.282/479A, Kamarajar Salai, North Malaiyandi Patty, Rajapalayam 635 117, Virudhunagar District. ... Petitioner Vs. Collectorate, Tiruvarur District. Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 3.The Surveyor, Survey Department, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey, measure, demarcate and identify boundaries for the lands comprised in Survey Nos.175/1, 175/4, 176/6, 189/1, 189/2, 189/4 & 189/6 measuring an extent of 11 acres and 12 cents situated at No.65, Chembarambakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District on the petitioners application 24.12.2025 bearing No.2025/0123/01/01/016383, within the time to be stipulated by this Court.Page No...
NASU SEIKH Vs The State by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Nasu Seikh S/o. Mamrej Seikh, Chupi, Barddhaman, West Bengal-713513. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State by Inspector of Police, PEW Ambattur Unit, Chennai, Crime No. 159 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: this petition is field under Section 483 of BNSS to grant bail to the petitioner in Crime No.159 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and pass such other further orders as this Honble Court may be deem fit in the interest of Justice. For Petitioner(s): S.Prabhudoss J.P.Ravivarman M.Lakshmanan Page1 of 6 For Respondent(s): Mr.A. Gopinath, Govt AdvocateORDERThe petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.10.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under SEctions 9(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1) of the NDPS Act in Crime No.159 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined handswith other a...
RAMKUMAR Vs The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Ramkumar ..Petitioner Vs1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police,2. The State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police,3. The State represented by The Additional Superintendent of Police - ADSP,4. Mrs.Ganasundari,President of South India Schedule Tribes Welfare Association, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the third respondent police not to harass the petitioners on the pretext of enquiry. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Deivanandam For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Subba Reddy for R4ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of enquiry.2. When the matter was ta...
R.Sekar Vs The State Rep. by its ,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.1357 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.35589 of 2025 R.Sekar ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by its District Crime Branch, Perambalur District. ... Respondent PRAYER : This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to relax the condition imposed in Paragraph No.6(b) of Honble Court in Crl.OP.No.35569 of 2025 dated 30.12.2025 in Cr.No.38 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Desinghu For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to relax one of the conditions imposed by this Court in Paragraph No. 6(b) in Crl.OP.No.35569 of 2025 dated 30.12.2025 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has duly complied the condition of this Court from 05.01.2026 to till date and hence prays t...
P.H.Mohamed Irfan vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.H.Mohamed Irfan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Principal Secretary, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Store Keeper made by the fourth vacancies and to disburse the salary and arrears of salary and all other benefits with effect from their date of appointment. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Martin Jaya Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan for R1 to R3 Additional Government PleaderORDERThe petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Store Keeper made by the fourth vacancy and to disburse the salary and arrears of salary and all other benefits with effect f...
P.Mayashakthi, vs the Principal Secretary to the Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI in 1.P.Mayashakthi ... Petitioner Vs. Thirupathur. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ananda Raj For Respondents : Mr.K.Tippu Sulthan *****ORDERThe Prayer sought for in this Miscellaneous Petition is akin to the relief sought for in the main Writ Petition. Therefore, granting relief herein would be nothing but giving relief in the main Writ Petition, which cannot be granted.2. For the reasons aforesaid, this Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. vm To Thirupathur.M.DHANDAPANI, J.vm in...
Rajeshkumar Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Rajeshkumar S/o.Jayendran, No.1/8, Thaneerpandhal Colony, Anupparpalayam, Tiruppur - 641 652. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Rep by Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.45 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Rajesh R For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 of BNS, 2023 r/w. Section 66 D of Information Technology Act in Crime No.45 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined handswith A1, who is brother of the petitioner, involved in online trading scam. The petitioner and others sent an online app and demanded the de...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »