Rajeshkumar Vs The State Rep by

Rajeshkumar vs The State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417982

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1417982
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar
Decided On: Jan 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP/2031/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajeshkumar

Respondent

The State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-01-2026coramthe honourable mr.justice k.rajasekar1. rajeshkumar s/o.jayendran, no.1/8, thaneerpandhal colony, anupparpalayam, tiruppur - 641 652. petitioner(s) vs1. the state rep by respondent(s)prayer to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with crime no.45 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. for petitioner(s): rajesh r for respondent(s): m/s.j.r.archana government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 of bns, 2023 r/w. section 66 d of information technology act in crime no.45 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined handswith a1, who is brother of the petitioner, involved in online trading scam. the petitioner and others sent an online app and demanded the de facto complainant to invest in the bank accounts furnished by them. further a5 has directed a1 to arrange the bank account. accordingly, a1 with the help of a3 opened the bank account and it was also handed over to a1. after money was deposited, on instructions of a5, a1 has transferred the money to other mural accounts and so far no amount is recovered. further it is reported against his bank account, 26 complaints are already registered. the case is at preliminary stage.3. this court earlier dismissed anticipatory bail petition of the petitionerin crl.o.p.no.28400 of 2025 dated 17.10.2025. since there is no change in circumstances, i am not inclined to reconsider the earlier order. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. mpa index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the state rep by 2.the public prosecutor, high court of madras. k.rajasekar j. mpa crl op no. 2031 of

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Rajeshkumar S/o.Jayendran, No.1/8, Thaneerpandhal Colony, Anupparpalayam, Tiruppur - 641 652. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep by Respondent(s)

PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.45 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Rajesh R For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 of BNS, 2023 r/w. Section 66 D of Information Technology Act in Crime No.45 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined hands

with A1, who is brother of the petitioner, involved in online trading scam. The petitioner and others sent an online app and demanded the de facto complainant to invest in the bank accounts furnished by them. Further A5 has directed A1 to arrange the bank account. Accordingly, A1 with the help of A3 opened the bank account and it was also handed over to A1. After money was deposited, on instructions of A5, A1 has transferred the money to other mural accounts and so far no amount is recovered. Further it is reported against his bank account, 26 complaints are already registered. The case is at preliminary stage.

3. This Court earlier dismissed anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner

in Crl.O.P.No.28400 of 2025 dated 17.10.2025. Since there is no change in circumstances, I am not inclined to reconsider the earlier order. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Mpa Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The State Rep by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 2031 of

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Rajeshkumar vs The State Rep by Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar