Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

RAMKUMAR Vs The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,

Ramkumar vs The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1417680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/1809/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramkumar

Respondent

The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30-01-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice a.d.jagadish chandira ramkumar ..petitioner vs1. the state represented by the superintendent of police,2. the state represented by the deputy superintendent of police,3. the state represented by the additional superintendent of police - adsp,4. mrs.ganasundari,president of south india schedule tribes welfare association, anna salai, saidapet, chennai - 600 015. ..respondents prayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita to direct the third respondent police not to harass the petitioners on the pretext of enquiry. page1 of 4 for petitioner : mr.m.deivanandam for respondents : mr.s.santhosh government advocate (criminal side) for r1 to r3 mr.p.subba reddy for r4orderthis criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of enquiry.2. when the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedgovernment advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed and the final report has also been filed through e-filing in c.no.198/aosp/cwc/kpm/2025, before the jurisdictional court, on 10.01.2026.3. recording the submission made by the learned government advocate (criminal side), this criminal original petition stands closed. neutral citation: yes/no mrn page2 of 4 to1. the superintendent of police,2. the deputy superintendent of police,3. the additional superintendent of police - adsp,4. the public prosecutor, high court of madras. page3 of 4a.d.jagadish chandira, j.mrn page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Ramkumar ..Petitioner Vs

1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police,

2. The State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

3. The State represented by The Additional Superintendent of Police - ADSP,

4. Mrs.Ganasundari,

President of South India Schedule Tribes Welfare Association, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015. ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the third respondent police not to harass the petitioners on the pretext of enquiry. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.M.Deivanandam For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Subba Reddy for R4

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of enquiry.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned

Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed and the final report has also been filed through e-filing in C.No.198/AOSP/CWC/KPM/2025, before the jurisdictional court, on 10.01.2026.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN Page2 of 4 To

1. The Superintendent of Police,

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

3. The Additional Superintendent of Police - ADSP,

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page3 of 4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

MRN Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Ramkumar vs The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice a.D.Jagadish Chandira

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales