Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Vigneswaran Vs J.Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANP.Vigneswaran ... Petitioner Vs. J.Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S., Commissioner, Park Town, Chennai- 600 003. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for wanton, deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23226 of 2024 dated 14.08.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. K.Venkateswaran For Respondent : Mr.S.Gopinath Standing CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non compliance of the order dated 14.08.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.23226 of 2024, thereby directed the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders to disburse the balance amount for the service rendered by the petitioner for the period from October 2020 to December, 2020 & March 2021 to July, 2021 within a period of...
Natanasabapathy (Died) 1. Ramesh Vs RAJKUMAR
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
CMP No.12694 of 2025: Petition filed to bring on record the deceased 1st petitioner Natanasabapathy in CRP No.1323 of 2023. CMP No.12695 of 2025: Petition filed to bring on record the deceased 1st petitioner Natanasabapathy in CRP No.1309 of 2023. CMP No.12696 of 2025: Petition filed to bring on record the deceased 1st petitioner Natanasabapathy in CRP No.1316 of 2023.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners 2 to 4 and the leaned counsel for the respondent in the civil revision petitions.3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no serious objection in ordering these petitions in view of the same having been necessitated on account of the demise of the 1st petitioner Natanasabapathy.4. I am satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions and no prejudice would be caused to the proposed Sr second respondent if these applications are ordered since he is in anyway is shown as one of the legal heirs of 1st petitioner Natanasabapathy.5...
Vijaya Sarathi vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.6402 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.331 of 2025 Vijaya Sarathi ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Sendurai Police Station, Ariyalur District (crime No.141 of 2022) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS, praying to suspend the sentence imposed in judgment dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur in SC.No.24 of 2023 and enlarge the appellant/accused on bail, pending disposal of the above appeal. For Petitioner : M/s.Usha Ramman For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed praying to suspend the sentence imposed in judgment dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur in SC.No.24 of 2023 and enlarge the appellant/accused on bail, ...
K.Kandasamy vs R.Sulochana (Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE K.Kandasamy .. Applicant vs M.Gandhimathi and others .. Respondents For applicant : Mr.S.Gopi For respondents : Mr.A.S.Balaji for R2ORDERAs directed by this Court, the applicant has effected substituted service on the first respondent by effecting paper publication. The paper publication has been filed along with this application. Despite effecting substituted service, the first respondent remains un-represented. Hence, the first respondent is set exparte by this Court.2.Since the respondents 3 to 5 have also been served with the notice in this application, they are also set exparte by this Court.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vga 3.This application has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of time for the Arbitrator to pronounce an arbitral award. 4.Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent has stated no objection for allowing this applic...
B.Nemichand Dugar Trust and 6 others Vs Nil
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.B.Nemichand Dugar Trust represented by its trustee N.Tarachand Dugar, Dugar Tower, 7th Floor, No.34, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 2.Mr.N.Tarachand Dugar 3.Mr.N.Mahaveerchand Dugar 4.Mr.N.Suresh Dugar 5.Mr.N.Chandkumar Dugar 6.Mr.N.Prakash Dugar 7.Mr.Rajendra Dugar PlaintiffsPRAYER: Plaint filed under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, read with Order IV Rule I of O.S.Rules, praying to grant permission to sell the property being all that piece and parcel of house, ground and premises bearing Municipal Door No.34 (earlier Door No.18 Muthukrishnan Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079, Madras 600 001) comprised in O.S.No.5995, R.S.No.129, Block No.2 of V.O.C.Nagar, Purasawalkam Taluk, Chennai District measuring an extent of1 ground and 1216 sq.ft. or thereabouts, which is more fully described in the schedule hereu...
Santhana Suresh vs Saranya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
Crl.M.P.No.13883 of 2025 in Crl.RC.SR.No.21452 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 34 days in filing this criminal revision petition against theorder dated 06.11.2024 passed inC.M.P.No.2 of 2024 in M.C.No.77 of 2023 on the file of the District Family Court, Tiruppur.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 34 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.07.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise inorder.Lpp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Vasantha @ Vasanthammal vs M/S. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH S.Vasantha @ Vasanthammal W/o . Seschalam, No. 1/10a, Vinayakar Koil Street, Dhanakondapalli Village, Kottametta Post, Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District Petitioner(s) Vs1. M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam LimitedBharat Sanchar Bhavan, Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath, New Delhi 110001 2.Executive Engineer (c ) Bsnl Telecom Civil Division III Chennai 03 3.The General Manager BSNL- Tower Division, Vellore 632 Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the BSNL Cell Tower with all the erections and installations over the piece of land measuring an extent of 400 sq.mts in the petitioners property in Survey No. 64/ 2D1, orders.For Petitioner(s): R.Govindasamy For Respondent(s): M/s. RP Vijayakrishnan, for R3 R1- Returned R2- Returned (no Such Office)ORDERThis writ peti...
Ravi Muthiah Vs The Regional passport officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESHRavi Muthaiah S/o.Muthaiah Petitioner Vs Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings in File No.CB1062627215919 dated 06.12.2019 on the file of the respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to issue passport in File No.CB1062627215919 to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian For Respondents : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, ASGOI assisted by Mr.C.Samivel, SPCGSC *****ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking quash of the proceedings of the respondent in File No.CB1062627215919 dated 06.12.2019 and consequently, direct the respondent to issue passport to the petitioner.2. Heard Mr.V.Illanchezian, learned counsel for petitioner andMr.AR.L.Sundaresan, learned Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Mr.C....
M/S.S.K.R.Industeis vs the Reserve Bank of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH1. M/s.S.K.R.Industries Rep By Its Partner, V.Sathishkanna, Office At No.268, Thandalam Service Road, Kovur, Chennai- 128. 2.M.Thangaraj Partner, SKR Industries, Office At No.268, Thandalam Service Road, Kovur, Chennai-128. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Reserve Bank Of India Regional Office, Fort Glacis , Rajaji Salai, Chennai -600 001. 2.Canara Bank Ramapuram Branch, No.5, Valluvar Salai, Gokulam Colony, Ramapuram, Chennai- 89. 3.SOUNDARAJAN Partner, M/s.S.K.R. Industries, Residing A No.1/2, Balambigai Nagar, 1st Main Road, Ramapuram, Chennai-089. Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to immediately de- freeze the current account numbers 3392201000071 and 3392261000014 (CC-OD) maintained by the petitioner firm and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sam Jayaraj Houston for M/s.S...
M.NANDAKUMAR Vs The Senior Intelligence Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMARM.Nanda Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit, 72 GN Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail pending investigation in C.C.No.123 of 2022 on the file of 1st Additional Special Judge for EC & NDPS Cases, Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar, Special Public ProsecutorORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.12.2021, for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w. 22(c), 28 & 29 of the NDPS Act in C.C.No.123 of 2022, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was arrested on24.12.2021. The petitioner along wit...