Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
St. Columbans Anglo-Indian Hr. Sec. School Vs The Government of Tamil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.10404 & 10406 of 2021 St. Columbans Anglo-Indian Hr. Sec. School Rep by its Correspondent, No. 3, Melean Street, George Town, Chennai - 600 001. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.E. S. I-Regional Corporation (Tamil Nadu) Rep by its Regional Director, 3.E. S. I. Regional Office, Rep by its Deputy Director, 4.Recovery Officer, E. S. I. Corporation, Panchdeep Bhavan, ...RespondentsPrayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice dated 24.10.2019 in NO. TN / INs. VIII / 51-00-106762-000-1302 / C18. Adhoc, on the file of the 3rd respondent in respect of the petitioner aided Anglo-Indian School and quash the same, in compliance of ...
Ankit Kumar Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Ankit Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Thudialur Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.109 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.109 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saranraj For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.02.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) & 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.109 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused were found to be in illegal possession of 350 packets weighing 200 grams ganja laced chocolates, totally 70 kgs of gan...
V.D.Ashok kumar Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR V.D.Ashok Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), St. Thomas Mount Panchayat Union, Chitlapakkam, Chennai 600 064. 5.The Village President, Nanmangalam Village Panchayat, Nanmangalam, Chennai 600 129. 6.P.Dhanapal 7.M.Shanmugam Page Nos.1/12 8.S.Senthilmal 9.T.Mani ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein more specifically the first respondent herein, to conduct an enquiry with respect to the representation of the petitioner to remove the encroachment situated at Siddhartha Nagar, Nanmangalam Village, Tambar...
Priyadharshini Vs State rep. by,The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Priyadharshini ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.1379 of 2024) ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of arrest and pending investigation in the Cr.No.1379 of 2024, on the file of the Inspector of Police, H5-New Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai-600 081. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shriharan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.VvORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner has already been arrested in this case.2. Recording the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. 30.07.2025 Vv To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The ...
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs Agnivishnu Ventures Private Limit ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN C.M.P.No.18107 of 2025 in W.A.SR No.41575 of 2025 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2(1) Investigation Building, First Floor New No.46, Old No.108, MG Road Nungambakkam Chennai-600 034 and another Petitioners Vs Agnivishnu Ventures Private Limited rep. by its Director S.Santhosh Kumar No.76, Temple Towers North Mada Street Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 Tamil Nadu, India Respondent For Petitioners: Mr.A.P.Srinivas Babu For Respondent: Mr.M.V.SwaroopORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Mr.M.V.Swaroop, learned counsel appears and takes notice for the respondent.2. Heard on the prayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal.3. Taking into consideration the short period of delay and the cause shown, we are inclined to condone the delay.4. Application for condonation of delay...
Nawab Chanda Main Mosque vs 1.Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
1/2 CMP Nos.8325, 8334 and 8338/2025 in C.R.P No.95 of 2010N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.These three petitions have been filed i) to condone the delay of 624 days in filing the petition to set aide the abatement, ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 14th respondent and iii) also to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 14th respondent as respondents 16 to 18 in the Civil Revision Petition.2. Considering the nature of thereasons assigned in the affidavits filed along with these petitions and taking note of the dispute between the parties and also the legal heirs are to be brought on record for final adjudication, these three petitions are Ordered. 30.07.2025 uma (1/2) Note: The registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the civil revision petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Dayalan Rajes vs the Assistant General Manager
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.21592 of 2025 Mr.Dayalan Rajes . Petitioner .Vs. 1.The Assistant General Manager Canara Bank, Salem. 2.The Branch Manager Canara Bank Yercaud. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to discharge the mortgage bearing Doc.No.459/16and 460/16 SRO Yercaud and release the documents contained therein. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramesh for Mr.R.Ashwanth For Respondents : Mr.R.Sreedhar Standing CounselORDERThis writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to discharge the mortgage loan and to release the documents. 2.The case of the petitioner is that he and his wife late Hema Dayalan approached the 2nd respondent bank for loan. The same was sanctioned. The petitioner and his wife mortgaged their joint property ...
R.Sridhar Vs P.Gowri and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU1.R.Sridhar Petitioner vs. 1.Smt.P.Gowri 2.Smt.G.Maragatham 3.Smt.L.Saraswathi ...Respondents PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 232 & 276 of the Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of Original Side Rules, prays that Letters of Administration with the Will dated 12.05.2000 annexed may be granted to petitioner as the Son/Legatee/beneficiary under the Will of the said deceased M.Ramachandran having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ananda Kumar For Respondents : No appearance (For R1 to R3)ORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of the Letters of Administration in respect of the Will dated 12.05.2000 executed by Mr.M.Ramachandran, who died on 04.05.2002. The petitioner and the respondents 1 to 3 are the children of the testator. The testator had not appointed any executor for the above said Will.2. The petitioner ...
J.Prabavathi vs S.Vijayan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and J.Prabavathi ...Petitioner Vs. S.Vijayan ...Respondent Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24(1)(b) of Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.105 of 2024 before the Sub Court, Maduranthakam, Chengalpattu District and the same may be transferred to the Sub Court, For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondent : Mr.V.C.VinothkumarORDERThe petitioner/wife seeks transfer of HMOP.No.105 of 2024 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Maduranthakam, Chengalpattu District to the file of the Sub Court, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai Page No.1 of 4 District.2. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and I have also gone through the affidavit filed in support of this transfer petition.3. Learned counsel for the respondent fairly submitted that the respondent/husband has no serious objection for transfer of HMOP.No.105 of 2024 as prayed for by th...
Anitha Mabet Manohar Vs Mrs. Sudha Vanamali
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and Anitha Mabel Manohar ... Petitioner vs- Sudha Vanamali Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II (PoHW), Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Chennai South, No.37, Royapettah High Road, Chennai 600 014 ..Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for wilfully and deliberately violating the order in W.P.No.29030 of 2025 dated 29.10.2024.For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondent : Mr.R.VishnuORDERIt is informed that the order of this Court in W.P. No.29030 of 2025 dated 29.10.2024 has been complied with. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the rate of pension is lower than what is actually due to the petitioner and that he may be granted liberty to challenge the same.2. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. However, it is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »