Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.SIVARAMAN Vs M. Shakul Hameed
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI1. S.Sivaraman S/o. Sugumar, 4/100, Bharathiyaar St, Sirukadal Village, Thozhur Post, Tiruvallur Taluk. Appellant(s) Vs1. M. Shakul HameedNo.28/2, Athikesavalunaidu St, Avadi, Chennai 54. 2.The Bharti AXA General Ins.Co.ltd., having office at Metrto Plaza, 2 nd Floor 162, Opp to Spenzar Plaza, Anna Salai, Chennai 2. Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988, praying to enhance the amount awarded in MCOP No.116 of 2016 orderdated 04.06.2019 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court to deal with Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal No.II, Thiruvallur) (Special Subordinate Judge). For Appellant(s): Mr. U.Chithambaram For Respondent(s): Ms. R. Rathna Thara For R2 R1 - No Such PersonJUDGMENTThe appellant has filed this appeal praying to enhance the compensation awarded in MCOP.No. 116 of 2016 dated 04.06.2019 ...
Dec Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs Balu Iron and Steel Company Rep by its p ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A.No.126 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.177 of 2024 M/s. Dec Infrastructure, 2-1-434/1, Nallakunta, Hyderabad 500044. Telangana State Having its Project office and working site at 15th main road, customs quarters, Near Chandramouleeshwar temple, Anna Nagar, Chennai. Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Gopalakrishnan Palanisamy ... Applicant/Defendant -vs-1. M/s. Balu Iron & Steel Company,Rep. by its Partner Mr. B. Karthik S/o. A.K.Balasubramanian Having its Branch Office at Old No.8, New No.27, ARK colony, Eldam Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.2. M/s.Balu Cement Corporation,Rep. by its Partner Mr. B. Karthik, S/o. A.K.Balasubramanian, Having Branch Office at No. 48/1A, Mayilam Pondy Road, Vanur Taluk, Thiruchitrambalam, Villupuram District 605111. ... Respondents 1 & 2/Plaintiffs3. M/s. Ramesh Iron and Steel Company India Private Limited,Rep. by its Director, ...
Sonal J.Davey and 2 Others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Sonal.J.Davey 2.Khushali.J.Davey 3.Yash.J.Davey PetitionersPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 6 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that a Succession Certificate may be granted to the 1st petitioner with the power to collect the securities and receive interest, dividends and thereon and negotiate and transfer the securities as listed out in the schedule. For Petitioners : M/s.Vidya ChetanORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in favour of the 1st petitioner in respect of the securities held by Mr.Jatin B.Davey, who died intestate on 30.09.2023.2. The petitioners submit that the deceased was married to the 1stpetitioner and the couple had begotten the petitioners 2 and 3 as their children. The petitioners further submit that the mother of the deceased Mrs.Sarita B.Davey ha...
Sudhakara Vadhanam vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI1. Sudhakara Vadhanam S/o Sundara Vadhanam, No.8, Kambar Street, Barathidasan Nagar, Alapakkam, Chennai 600 116 Appellant(s) Vs1. The Managing DirectorMetropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd, NO.2, Pallavan House, Anna Salai Chennai 2 Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, prays to set aside the decree and judgment dated 30.11.2022 passed in MCOP.No.1327/2015 by the learned II Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Chennai, II Small Causes Court, at Chennai and enhance the award from the amount of Rs.60,600 to Rs.5,60,600(Rupees Five Lakhs and Sixty Thousands and six hundred only) as restricted prayed before this Honble Court and direct the respondent to pay the award amount along with interest and cost. For Appellant(s): Mr.T.G. Ravichandran For Respondent(s): Mr. M. Murali VinodJUDGEMENTThe appellant has filed this appeal to s...
Sivasundaram Pillai vs Amudha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated:30.07.2025Coram::THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.32 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.1214 of 2023 Sivasundaram Pillai, S/o Tharma Pillai, Door No.7/5, Sakthi Vinayagar Kovil Street, Velankanni Village, Kilvelur Taluk, Nagapattinam Munsifi. ..1st Defendant/Appellant/versus/1.Amudha, W/o Rathinasabapathy 2.Vigneswaran, S/o Rathinasabapathy 3.Vasanth S/o Rathinasabapathy 1 to 3 were formerly residing at Door No.7/5, Sakthi Vinayagar Kovil Street, Velankanni Village, Kilvelur Taluk, Nagapattinam Munsifi.Now residing at Door No.1/153, North Street, North Poigainallur Village. ..Plaintiffs/Respondents 1 to 3 4.Parvathi, W/o Karthikesan, Railway Street East, Vedaraniyam, Vedaraniyam Taluk and Munsif. 5.Dhanalakshmi, W/o Dakshinamoorthy, North Street, North Poigainallur Village, Nagapattinam Taluk and Munsifi. 6.Sreemani, W/o Arumugam, Door No.1/165, North Street, North Poigainallur Village, Nagapattinam Taluk and Munsifi. ..Defendant...
Subramaniam vs Kalaivanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Subramaniam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Kalaivanan 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed praying to permit the petitioner to replace the original joint agreement to Photo Copy of the Joint Agreement. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents For R1 : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For R2 & 3 : Mr.M.Murali, Government AdvocateORDERThis writ miscellaneous petition has been filed praying to permit the petitioner to replace the original joint agreement dated 25.05.2022 to photocopy of the said joint agreement.2. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the first respondent, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 2 & 3 and perused all the materials placed before this Court.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of this...
M/s.G.R.Thangamaligai (Firms) Vs K.Bavani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
A.Nos.3639 & 3640 of 2025 in C.S.Nos.81 & 91 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Applications have been filed to receive the Reply Statement in C.S.No.81 of 2024 and to receive the Reply Statement in C.S.No.91 of 2024.2. Mr.T.Paranthaman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that he has no objection in allowing the said applications.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made in theaffidavit filed in support of these applications and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 has no objection in allowing these applications, the applications in A.Nos.3639 & 3640 of 2025 in C.S.Nos.81 & 91 of 2024 are ordered as prayed for. 30.07.2025 (1/2) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Aquapump Industries vs Texmo Industries
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY 1.Aquapump Industries Represented by its Managing Partner Mr.Ramaswamy Kumaravelu Thudiyalur Post, Coimbatore 641 034 Having their branch office at No.21, P.H.Road, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107. 2.Aquasub Engineering Represented by its Managing Partner Mr.Ramaswamy Kumaravelu Thudiyalur Post, Coimbatore 641 034 Having their branch office at No.21, P.H.Road, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107. ... Plaintiffs -vs- Tecmo Industries 44 A, South Street No.2 Avarampalayam, Coimbatore 641 006. ... Defendant PRAYER: Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 And Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, 1956 Read With Sections 27, 134 and 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to grant a judgment and decree on the following terms:-(a) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendant, byitself, its servants, agents, distributors, or anyone claiming through them from m...
Nisha Henry vs the Passport Authority of India,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Nisha Henry Petitioner Vs Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.09.2024 to issue a new passport. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.J.Rajesh, Central Government Standing Counsel *****ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 30.09.2024 wherein the petitioner is seeking for issuance of a fresh passport in her name.2. The case of the petitioner is that her parents are Srilankanrefugees. They came to India in 1987 and the petitioner was born in India on 03.09.1992. The petitioner, thereafter, continued her education in India and got married on 01.09.2021. The petitioner applied for passport...
M/S.R S Jewel Tech, Vs Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes Departm ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M/s.R S Jewel Tech, Represented by Proprietor Natesan Viswanathan Senthil, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 017. ...Petitioner Vs. Assistant Commissioner Nandanam, Zone VI, Chennai Central, Tamil Nadu - 600 028. ...Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records leading to the issuance of order DRC07 under Section 73 dated 27.06.2023, by the respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent herein to consider the September 2021 month returns, with a direction that excess tax paid in July 2021 erroneously may be adjusted against the excess utilisation of Input Tax credit. For Petitioner : Mr.T.C.PrakashFor Respondent : Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik Additional Government Pleader (Tax)ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the impugne...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »