Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Chandrasekar, Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.14701 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No. 1256 of 2025 K.Chandrasekar .... Petitioner Vs 1.The State Rep. By the Public Prosecutor 2.K.Viswananth Kamath .... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 438 & 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to suspend the sentence passed in the judgment and order dated 29.11.2024 in Crl.Appeal No.309 of 2023 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, for convicting the petitioner in the above appeal and confirming the Judgment dated 23.08.2023 passed in C.C.No.418 of 2017 on the file of the II Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajesh VivekananthanFor R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned I...
Mrs.Asha P Sharma and 3 others Vs nil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
A.No.3624 of 2025 in O.P.No.372 of 2003K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Application has been filed to grant extension of the Succession Certificate with power to collect the Debts, receive interest and dividends on and negotiate and transfer in respect of the debts morefully described and in the Schedule to the accompanying this Judges Summons.2. Considering the averments made in theaffidavit filed in support of this application and having been satisfied with the reasons stated therein, the application in A.No.3624 of 2025 in O.P.No.372 of 2003 is ordered as prayed for. 30.07.2025 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Chandrasekar, Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.R.C.No. 1256 of 2025 K.Chandrasekar .... Petitioner Vs 1.The State Rep. By the Public Prosecutor 2.K.Viswananth Kamath .... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the Trial Court in C.C.No.418 of 2017, on the file of the II Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore, pending disposal of this revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajesh Vivekananthan For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.LppORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial Court.2. In view of the order passed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.14701 of2025 dated 30.07.2025, granting suspension of sentence, no further order is necessary in this petition. Accordingly, ...
M/S Super Spinning Mills Ltd vs the Additional Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 24.07.2025PRONOUNCED ON: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN M/s.Super Spinning Mills Ltd., Elgi Towers Green Fields, 737-D, Puliakulam Road, Coimbatore 641 045. Appellant Vs The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle 1(2), Coimbatore. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Chennai, dated 28.08.2009 passed in ITA No.978/MDS/2008 for the AY 2003-04. For Appellant : Mr.A.S.Sriraman For Respondent : Mr.V.Mahalingam Senior Standing CounselJUDGMENT(Delivered by SUNDER MOHAN, J) The Tax Case Appeal impugns an order dated 28.08.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai, [hereinafter referred to as 'ITAT'], which had partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellant / assessee.2. On 07.12.2009, the ap...
A. Rajagopalan vs M/S. Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN CMP No. 13587 of 2025 and A.S.SR.No.93677 of 2024 A. Rajagopalan S/o.Late P.N.Arumugam, No.3 Madhavamani Avenue, Velacherry Main Road, Chennai - 600 042. ..Petitioner/Appellant(s) Vs M/s. Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt Ltd Rep. by its Managing Director, Sruthi No.21, 2nd Main Road Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020. and 2 Others ....Respondent(s) For Petitioner/Appellant(s): Mr.V. Manohar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Sundaresan for R1 No appearance for R2 & R3ORDERJ.NISHA BANU,J.and This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 87 days to restore the order made in CMP.No.17457 of 2024 in AS.SR.No.93677 of 2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedcounsel for the 1st respondent. -2- and 3.Considering the submissions made and on being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit, this Court is of...
A.Waheeda Banu vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN A.Waheeda Banu ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner, Chennai 600 015.3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Ariyalur Detachment, Ariyalur District. ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records relating to the first respondent proceeding made in G.O (D) No.96, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (E2) Department on 20.04.2023 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service revoking the order of suspension. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saranraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader *****ORDERThough the present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the suspension order dated 20.04.2025, the learned Speci...
Deivanayagi vs Sivagame(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P (NPD) Nos.869 and 871 of 2020 and CMP No.4640 of 2020 Deivanayagi ... Petitioner ..Vs. Sivagame (died) 1.Deva Achari 2.Dhanalakshmi 3.Meena 4.Usha 5.Elango 6.Padma 7.Subramani 8.The Sub Registrar-2 Arakonam. ... Respondents decreetal order dated 30.09.2019 passed in I.A No.532 of 2018 in O.S decreetal order dated 30.09.2019 passed in I.A No.531 of 2018 in O.S N.SATHISH KUMAR,J uma For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Sridharan For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal for R8 Government Advocate No Appearance - R3 to R6 R1, R2 & R7 - Notice unservedORDER` Though this Court, by an order dated 08.07.2025 ordered notice to the respondents 1, 2 and 7, steps have not been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner to serve notice. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 30.07.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No uma To ...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs Rangan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
C.M.P.No.2722 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.14151 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP. DHANABAL, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 113 days in filing the appeal. Heard Mr.T.Jayaraman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.M.Jayachandran, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 5. Despite notice having been served upon respondent 6, none appears before this Court. The delay is only 113 days. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and since there are no serious objections, the delay of 113 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the petition stands ordered. (R.S.K., J) (P.D.B., J) 30.07.2025 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Padmavathy vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN CMP No. 2352 of 2022 in Rev.Appl.SR.No.14750 of 2022 S.Padmavathy D/O.V.Selvaraju, Plot No.30, Gandhi Mudaliar Nagar, Thiruthuraipoondi, Thiruvarur Dt. Appellant(s) Vs The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board, College Road, Chennai 6. and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.SiddarathORDERJ.NISHA BANU,J.and This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 705 days in filing the Review Application.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedcounsel for the respondent. 3.Considering the submissions made and on being satisfied with -2- and reasons stated in the affidavit, this Court is of the view that the delay may be condoned, however, on payment of cost. Accordingly, the delay is condoned on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) by the petitioner to...
Gohila vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH1. Gohila W/o.Sivamoorthy, No.6E-Anai Muniyappan Kovil, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Sub RegistrarMettur, Salem District 2.Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd (HDFC Ltd), HDFC House, No.29, Kamaraj Road, Coimbatore-641 018 Rep By Its Authorised Officer 3.The Superintendent Of Police Salem, Salem District. 4.The Deputy Superintendent Of Police Mettur, Salem District 5.The Inspector Of Police Karumalaikoodal Police Station, 6.Lenindas Rubi W/o.Jegadeeshkumar, No.10/1-43, 7.Jegadeesh Kumar S/o.P.Selvaraj, No.10/1-43 Respondent(s)PRAYER: The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent bank to clear all obstructions and illegal grabbing made by the respondents 6 and 7 on the house property situated in S.No.96/1A1A, 96/2B1A to the extent of 2742.5 sq.ft at No.10/...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »