Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
VAITHEESWARAN Vs Vinothkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed To1. The Special District Judge, MCOP Tribunal, Salem.2. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court, Madras. T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl 24-07-2025...
S. Shakila Vs Aadhisesha Avinash
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
CMP No. 5797 of 2024 in CMA S.R. N.o. 29916 of 2024T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 241 days in filing the appeal.2. Heard the submission of thelearned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent. The reason assigned by the petitioner for delay is justifiable. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. Further, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. 29.07.2025 pbl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
THE KUMBAKKONAM MUTUAL Vs P.V.Ekambaram (Deceased) 1.E.Pushp and 2 oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
All these applications have been filed to condone the delay of 457 days in seeking to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole defendant, P.V.Ekambaram; to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole defendant and to bring on record the respondents 1 to 3 as the respondents 2 to 4 in the above application in A.No.172 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. There is arepresentation on behalf of the legal heirs of the deceased defendant and the learned counsel states that he is hopeful that he would be entering appearance on behalf of the proposed respondents.3. The suit has been filed for mortgage. There was a delay inproceedings with the preliminary decree granted, not only owing to the death of the defendant and also owing to the fact that the property was brought under acquisition by the Government. It is learnt that the acquisition proceedings had been dropped and the property had been released from acquisition and it is now open to...
Alphonsa Vs S. Sekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
C.M.P.No.8589 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.32246 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP. DHANABAL, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal. Heard Mr.A.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo giving up the first respondent, which according to him is not a necessary party or a contesting party. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the same, the first respondent is removed from the array of parties. None appears for the second respondent though already having been served. The delay is only 47 days. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 47 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the petition stands ordered. (R.S.K., J) (P.D.B., J) 29.07.2025 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Divisional Manager vs Deepa
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI and CMP.No.3558 of 2022 The Divisional Manager Tamilnadu State Transport , Corporation Villupuram Ltd, Villupuram, Villupuram District-604 303. Appellant Vs1. Deepa2.Minor Nimuna D/O Suresh, minor rep by their mother and guardian the 1st respondent Deepa 3.Minor Jayashree D/O Suresh , minor rep by their mother and guardian the 1st respondent -Deepa 4.Naavappan 5.Thavursayee 6.ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd No.140, Nungambakkam High RoadChottabai Centre, 2nd and 3rd Floor, Nungambakkam, Respondent(s) Chennai - 600 034. PRAYER This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act to set aside the judgment and decree dated 19/11/2019 passed in MCOP.No.256 of 2016 on the file of the MACT Special District Judge,Villupuram. For Appellant(s): Mr.S.S.Santhosa Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Ram Prabu for Mr.L.Ramanathan for R1 To R4 Mr.P.Magesh for R6 ...
THE MANAGER Vs Mohammed Hidayathullah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI and CMP.No.5721 of 2025 The Manager, M/s.National Insurance Company Limited, Third Party Claims Office, No.66, Greams Road,Chennai-600 006. .. Appellant Vs.1. Mohammed Hidayathullah2. Moorthy ..RespondentsPrayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.03.2024 made in M.C.O.P.No.130 of 2019 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (VI Court of Small Causes) at Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.J.Michael Visuvasam For Respondents: M/s.U.Chithambaram for R1 R2-NDWJUDGMENTThis Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance company, challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 20.03.2024 made in M.C.O.P.No.130 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai.2.The appellant-Insurance Company is the 2nd respondent in M.C.O.P.No.130 ...
S.Jeeva vs K.Balan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S. Jeeva ... PetitionerVersusK. Balan ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 & 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to set aside the judgement dated 29.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.57 of 2021, on the file of the Special Court for Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (POA), Act, Namakkal, confirming the conviction and sentence in the judgement dated 08.03.2021 made in C.C.No.526 of 2018, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, No.1, Namakkal.For Petitioner : Mr. S. Mohan Raj, Mr. T. Yogesh, and Mr. R.M. Bhuvana For Respondent : Mr. G. Ravi KumarORDERThis revision has been preferred against the Judgement dated 29.06.2022 in Crl.A.No.57 of 2021, on the file of the Special Court for Trial of Cases registered under Schedule Caste/Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) SC/ST (POA), Act, Namakkal, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence in...
R.Sivaranjani vs G.Nishanth
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND CMP NO. 5518 OF 20251. R.Sivaranjani D/o.G.Ravi, No.4 Gopinaidu Street, Dharma Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai - 600 077. Petitioner(s) Vs1. G.Nishanth S/o.Gopikrishnan, No.11g, Metha Nagar, Andaankuppam, Kundrathur, Chennai - 600 069. Respondent(s)PRAYER The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to withdraw HMOP.No.295/2024 pending before Honble Subordinate Court, Alandur and to transfer the same to Honble Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur. For Petitioner: Mr.C.A.Ashok Kumar For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERPursuant to the orders of this Court, the petitioner effected publications in one issue of the Tamil daily Malai Murasu, edition dated 2.06.2025. 2.Despite the publication, the respondent has chosen neither to appear in person nor through counsel. Hence, the respondent is called as 'ex parte. 3.Heard the lear...
T.Suresh Kumar vs Sagunthala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL T. Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs1. Sagunthala M. Krishnasamy @ Stephenraj (died)2. M.Rajendran3. M.Rajkumar4. R.Dilip Kumar5. R.Sona Priya6. R.Priyanga7. R.Subash Kumar8. M.Devanandam @ Durai (died)9. Devi10. Philomina11. D.Thamizharasi12. D.Vinothkumar13. D.Vinodhini .... RespondentsPrayer:- The Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order XXII rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to implead the respondents 11 to 13 herein as respondents 11 to 13 in the present first appeal in the capacity of legal heirs of deceased 8th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sai Shankar For Respondents : Mr.S.Krishnasamy for R1 Mr.A.Malath Devapriyam for R11 to R13ORDERMr.S.Saishankar, learned Counsel on record for the petitioner, Mr.S.Krishnasamy, learned Counsel on record for the 1st respondent and Mr.A.Malath Devapriyam, learned Counsel on record for respondents 11 to 13 are before ...
P.Meenakshi Vs B.Gopalan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-29-2025
The matter is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in paragraph 7 of the order, dated 29.07.2025 it has been wrongly typed as 'allowed' instead of 'dismissed'. Therefore, he prays for appropriate corrections. 3.In view of the said submission, paragraph No.7 of the order shall be read as follows: 7. In the result, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed.4. In all other aspects, the order dated 29.07.2025 shall remain unaltered. 5.Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections and issue corrected copy to the respective parties. am Page No.1 of 2 am Page No.2 of 2...