Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. James Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation rep. by its Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to settle the petitioner's retirement benefits including Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Wages, Arrears Amount and Dearness Allowance payable to him along with monthly Pension with reasonable rate of interest within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.0...
Gerard Perir Vs. The Income-Tax Officer, Range XV(1), Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order made in I.T.A.No.3094/Mds/2004, dated 21.09.2006.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Tax Case Appeal is directed against the order made in I.T.A.No.3094/Mds/2004, dated 21.09.2006, on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Chennai, for the assessment year 1999-2000. 2. Short facts leading to the appeal are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture and export of fabrics. For the assessment year 1999-2000, the appellant has filed return of income on 24.12.1999, wherein, he had adjusted the gross total income of Rs.25,51,237/-, against deductions of Rs.26,01,894/- and Rs.12,000/-, under Sections 80HHC and 80L of the Income Tax Act, 1961, respectively. The claim of Rs.26,01,894/-, also included deduction, under Section 80HHC of the Act, in respect of interest income of Rs.20,58,049/-, which the appellant treated, as business income. 3. The assessing officer issued notice, under Sect...
Ganesan Vs. State rep. By Deputy Superintendent of Police, Namakkal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment, dated 25.09.2014 in S.C.No.90 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Namakkal.) This appeal is filed against the judgment dated 25.09.2014 made in S.C.No.90 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Namakkal. The appellant/accused is convicted and sentenced by the trial Court as tabulated hereunder: ad>Sl.No.Conviction under SectionSentence of ImprisonmentFine1Section 417 IPCSimple imprisonment for one yearRs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month2Section 376(1) IPCRigorous imprisonment for ten yearsRs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month3Section 3(2)(v) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) ActRigorous imprisonment for ten yearsRs.5,000/- in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month The trial Court ordered the sentences imposed on the appellant/accused to run concurrently. 2. The case of the prosecutio...
J. Kumar Vs. The Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., (Kumbakon ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to pay all the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Salary arrears in terms of settlement from 01.09.2013 to 31.08.2014 Gratuity and Leave Salary in terms of settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 13.04.2015 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment within the time that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would ...
S. Nagasubramanian Vs. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Ma ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
1. Writ Petition(MD)Nos.14737, 13416, 10299 and 9617 to 9621 of 2016 have been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respective respondents to allow the respective petitioners to work as Salesman, Selection Grade Senior Factory Assistant and Selection Grade Mazdoor respectively, in the respective respondent's Co-operative Society upto the age of 60 years, with all service and monetary benefits. 1.1. Writ Petition(MD)Nos.14790 and 13562 of 2016 have been filed by the petitioners, challenging the impugned orders dated 06.08.2016 and 27.04.2016, passed by the respondents 2 and 4 respectively, relieving the petitioners from service, on the ground that they have attained the age of superannuation of 58 years, to quash the same, with a consequential direction to the respondents to allow them to work as Salesman and Special Senior Mazdoor in the respective respondent's Co-operative Society upto the age of 60 years with all service and monetary benefits. 1.2. Since the is...
T. Radha Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.1,95,291/- towards Leave Salary together with 18% interest per annum and also interest amount towards the delayed payment of Gratuity amount Rs.3,51,992/- for the period from 01.05.12 to 30.12.13 as per Sec.7(3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay him interest amount towards the delayed payment of Pension Commutation amount Rs.1,91,060/- for the period from 01.05.2012 to 29.10.2013 at the rate of 18% interest per annum, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a...
S. Indharani Vs. C. Ganesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960 r/w Act 1 of 1979 against the order dated 02.12.2011 in R.C.A.Nos.12 and 11 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Nagapattinam, confirming the judgment and decree in R.C.O.P.No.5 of 2008 dated 17.08.2010 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Nagapattinam.) 1. Challenging the fair and final order passed in R.C.A.No.12 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Nagapattinam, confirming the order passed in R.C.O.P.No.5 of 2008 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Nagapattinam, the tenant has filed the Civil Revision Petition in C.R.P.(NPD).No.3817 of 2012. 2. Challenging the fair and final order passed in R.C.A.No.11 of 2010 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Tribunal (Subordinate Court), Nagapattinam, confirming the order passed in R.C.O.P.No.5 of...
Nithin Nair Vs. State rep. by The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Common Prayer: Criminal Revision Petitions are filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to set aside the dismissal order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai in Cr.M.P.Nos.918 and 924 of 2016 in C.C.Nos.6 and 5 of 2014 respectively dated 06.08.2016.) Common Order: 1. As the issue involved is connected in both the revisions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The ACB of CBI, Chennai is prosecuting the petitioner/A1 in C.C.Nos.6 and 5 of 2016 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai for his alleged commission of certain offences. 3. The case has reached the stage of conducting of further proceedings under Sections 239 240 Cr.P.C. He was on bail. He has executed surety bonds. Subsequently, he vanished into their air. So also his partner in crime/A2. In order to achieve progress in the trial of the case enforcing their attendance, the trial Court issued NBWs as against A1 and A2. As against the petitioner/A1, NBW ha...
Padmanaban and Others Vs. The Executive Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 361/Ne.Se.na and Kaa.Thu.Aa/Thi.Ma/2016 dated 05.07.2016 and quash the same.) 1. The Tamil Nadu Government, exercising powers conferred by Sub- Section 1 of Section 20 r/w Sub-Section 1 of Section 22 of Cr.P.C., through G.O.Ms.No.181 Home [CTS VIA] Department dated 25.02.2014 appointed the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Trichy to exercise the power under Section 107 to 110 of Cr.P.C. 2. Exercising such powers, the petitioners have been called upon by the 1st respondent by the order dated 05.07.2016 to appear before him. The communication further reads that the 2nd respondent has intimated the 1st respondent that the petitioners are indulging in causing breach of peace and in order to control the same, a case has been registered in Crime No.563 of 2016 dated 01.07.2016 and that the 1st respondent should initiate proceedings under Sect...
V. Manickam Vs. The District Collector/ Inspector of Panchayat, Kokkir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: in W.P.(MD).No.16185/2016:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the impugned order dated 09.08.2016 made in A6/3810/2014 of proposing to initiate proceedings under 203 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 by the 1st Respondent and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits. Prayer in W.P.(MD).No.16186/2016:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the impugned order dated 09.08.2016 made in A6/3810/2014 of proposing to initiate proceedings under 205 of Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 by the 1st Respondent and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits.) Common Order 1. The writ petitioner, being an elected President of Devanallur Panchayat, Kalakkad Panchayat Union, Tirunelveli District has been issued with the impugned notice by the District Collector, Tirunelveli, being the Inspector of Panchayat vide notice dat...