Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Francis Antony Raj Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the person or body of the detenue namely Stella Ebira aged 25 years wife of Francis Antony Raj and D/o.Simson Packiaraj before this honble court and set her at liberty.) K.K. Sasidharan, J. 1. The second respondent produced the detenue before us. The detenue informed us that she is not an illegal custody. she is living with her parents. 2. In view of the submission made by the detenue, nothing survives for adjudication in this Habeas Corpus Petition. 3. The detenu is set free. 4. The Habeas Corpus Petition is closed with the above observation....
P. Alagumalaikannan Vs. The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to ply his auto, to take passengers in and around Rameswaram by considering his representation dated 19.08.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to ply his auto for taking passengers in and around Rameswaram by considering his representation dated 19.08.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 7. 3. The case of the petitioner is that he is a fisherman having valid identity card issued by the Fishery Authorities and on account of several problems being faced by him, he decided to ply auto be...
The Commissioner, Ramanathapuram District Vs. Sivaramakrishnan and Oth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to call for the records relating to the order dated 20.08.2015 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(MD)No.14672 of 2015 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and set aside the same and allow the Writ Appeal as prayed for.) S.S. Sundar, J. 1. This Writ Appeal has been filed by the Commissioner, Rameshwaram Municipality against the order dated 20.08.2015 passed in W.P.(MD)No.14672 of 2015, filed by the first respondent herein for issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the proceeding of the appellant in Na.Ka.No.390/2015/A2, dated 10.08.2015 and to direct the Tahsildar and the appellant herein not to remove the petitioner's house in Survey No.696 in Rameshwaram Town, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The order impugned in the Writ Petition in W.P. (MD)No.14672 of 2015 is an order informing the first respondent herein about the removal of encroachment proposed by the appellant on 13.08.2015 and directing the encroachers to r...
Prasath Vs. The Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in P.R.C.No.27 of 2014 on the same pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and to quash the same in so far as the petitioner alone.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to quash P.R.C.No.27 of 2014 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.VI, Madurai, in which, the petitioner is the fifth accused, who has to face trial in respect of offences under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 307 r/w 149 IPC. Brief Facts:- 2. The petitioner is the successful candidate selected by the Staff Selection Commission (Southern Region) in the written examination for the post of Constable in CRPF. He was invited to undergo medical examination on 16.05.2016 and it is alleged that the petitioner has successfully completed the same and he has been found fit. The employer wanted the petitioner to produce No Objection Certificate from the local police station and the local police ...
M. Muthu and Another Vs. The State rep.by The Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 1 and 2 to produce the body or corpus of the petitioner's son, namely, Mathan S/o.M.Muthu, aged about 23 years residing at D.No.2/92, Aamoor Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, by securing him and set him at liberty.) (Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 1 and 2nd respondents to produce petitioner's daughter Anadammal @ Rooba, d/o.perumal, aged about 19 years, who is under the illegal custody of the third respondent and produce her before this Court.) Common Order K.K. Sasidharan, J. 1. The Habeas Corpus Petition No.1057 of 2016 is filed to direct the Police to produce the son of the petitioner before this Court. The connected Habeas Corpus Petition No.1075 of 2016 is filed by the father of the detenue to produce his daughter, who is said to be in illegal custody of the third respond...
J. Muthu Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, O/o. The Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to remove the entry in Encumbrance Certificate in respect of the mortgage in Document No.4499, dated 19.11.2010 in respect of the Petitioner's property in Survey No.29/5 and Survey No.29/4B situated at Vandiyoor II Bit Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District, by considering his representation to the Respondents, dated 30.12.2015.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3. 4. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in directing the Respondents to remove the entry in Encumbrance Certificate, in respect of the mortgage in Document No.4499, dated 19.11.2010, in respect of the property in Survey No.29/5 and Survey No.29/4B, situated at Vandiyoor II Bit Village, Madura...
G. Chinnadurai Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Department
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in PANADYPC1409L/ A.Y.2011-2012, dated 30.08.2015, relating to Assessment Year 2011-12 read with reasons for re-assessment in PAN-ADYPC1409L/Scr./2015-16, dated 16.06.2015, both on the file of the respondent above, and quash the same.) 1. The petitioner assails the order passed by the respondent dated 30.08.2015, containing the reasons for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-12, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (Act). 2. For the purpose of adjudication of the present challenge the following facts are relevant. The petitioner filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 admitting an income of Rs.1,71,470/- and claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Act for an amount of Rs.3,12,50,000/-. A survey under Section 133A of the Act, was conducted in the premises of the petitioner on 31.10.2014, in the course of suc...
N. Lakshmana Selvan Vs. T.N. Selva Lakshmi
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in M.C.No.21 of 2015 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli dated 03.11.2015 and set aside the same in the interest of justice.) Aggrieved by the grant of maintenance to the respondent, the revision petitioner directed this revision. 2. On 12.06.2011, the revision petitioner married the respondent according to Hindu rites and customs. They were not blessed with issues. However, family quarrel arose between them. In H.M.O.P.No.253 of 2014, in the Family Court, Tirunelveli, the respondent sought for divorce on the ground of cruelty. In the very same Court, the present revision petitioner sought for divorce in H.M.O.P.No.194 of 2013 on the same ground. Thus, it is double divorce petition. On 29.01.2015, in the petition filed by respondent in H.M.O.P.No.253 of 2014, she was granted divorce, while the petition filed by the revision petitioner in H.M.O...
M. Lakshmi Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. By its Principal Secretar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call calling for the records connected with the Impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O. (4D) No. 11, Public Health and Family Welfare (No.2) Department, dated 29.06.2012, in so far as the petitioner is concerned and the consequential order of recovery passed by the 3rd respondent in his R.No.11228/A3/14, dated 16.07.2014, and quash the same and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to regularise the service of the petitioner from her date of appointment in the Category of Village Health Nurse from 09.11.2006.) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Consequently, connected Miscella...
Valli Vs. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondent No.2, to consider the representation submitted by the Petitioner, dated 19.04.2016, in accordance with law, within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, she is in continuous possession of 55 Cents of land, which was in possession of her ancestor in Kamuthakudi in Survey No.11. Till the year 2012, she was carrying-out the agricultural operation. Subsequently, due to insufficient rain, she could not cultivate the land in question. Hence, Babul trees were raised in the said land and the patta stands in her name, since 1993 to 2015. At this stage, she was cutting the Babul trees, at that time, the Third Respondent / Village Administrative Officer, Kamuthakudi, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, came to the la...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »