Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Nagarajan Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to conduct a detailed enquiry to cancel the patta issued in favour of A.Raja in respect of the land in Survey No.171/1, to an extent of 80 Cents bering Patta No.1717, situated at Vayalcherry Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, after affording all the opportunities to the respective parties within the time stipulated by this Court, pursuant to the Petitioner's representation, dated 11.07.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3. 4. According to the Petitioner, the land measuring an extent of 80 Cents in S.No.171/1 and Patta No.1717, situated at Vayalcherry Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, originally belonged to one Alagar S/o.Late.Periyampillai and the same was a self-acquired property ...
C.M. Anandan, B.A.B.L. Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of the fourth respondent, the District Collector, Thiruvallur, insofar as it relates to the order passed in her proceedings Na.Ka.No.197/98/Q2, dated 24.12.1998, as confirmed by the third respondent, in his proceeding No.Rc.No.4541/M-5/99, dated 16.02.2001, and the consequential order passed by the fourth respondent, in his proceedings in R.C.No.992/2006/G and M-2, dated 05.10.2015, and the fifth respondent, the District Collector, Chennai, in her proceedings, No.G27371/15, dated - 10.2015, and signed on 08.11.2015, and to quash the said orders. (Prayer amended, as per order passed today in W.M.P.No.25793 of 2016).) 1. Heard Mr.Raja Kallifulla, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.J.Jayendra Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for respondents. 2. The amended prayer i...
S. Uma Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Principal Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: in W.P(MD)No.16078 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2878/A3/20016, dated 13.08.2016 and quash the same.) Prayer: in W.P(MD)No.16079 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned letter of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.024064/E1/2015, dated 22.07.2016, and quash the same in so far as directing to deploy junior most teacher in the Union and direct the 2nd respondent to deploy the junior most teacher in the school in which the students strength decreased.) Common Order 1. Tmt.S.Uma, after being appointed as a Secondary Grade Teacher in Panchayat Union Elementary School, Uthani, Thiruvarur District on 11.12.2012 was transferred to Panchayat Union Middle School, N.Kut...
Kaliyaperumal and Another Vs. Lakshmiammal and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in C.M.A.No.9 of 2010 on the file of the Sub-Court, Panruti, dated 31.01.2012 in confirming the order in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in O.S.No.146 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti, dated 05.10.2010.) 1. This civil revision petition has been filed against the judgment and decree in C.M.A.No.9 of 2010 on the file of the Sub-Court, Panruti, dated 31.01.2012 in confirming the order in I.A.No.162 of 2010 in O.S.No.146 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti, dated 05.10.2010. 2. The petitioners are the plaintiffs in this case. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.146 of 1999 against the respondents / defendants for declaration and for permanent injunction. 3. The case of the plaintiffs is that the property in old Survey No.130, there are 66 cents in which the first defendant is entitled to 23 cents, the second defendant is entitled to 3 ce...
Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner and Another
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Common Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the first respondent herein in TIN- 3341080802250/2007-08 and TIN:33410802250/2008-09, dated 10.10.2014, and quash the same insofar as it relates to the assessment of a sum of Rs.134,07,58,140/- and 136,93,17,498/- at 12.5% and imposition of consequential penalty under Section 27(3), or pass such further or other orders.) Common Order 1. The petitioner is a registered dealer on the file of the first respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, (TNVAT Act), and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, (CST Act), stated to be engaged in the business of FMCG products such as detergents, soaps, cosmetics, toothpaste, coffee, tea, etc., having their factory at Hosur and at Chennai. Besides their factory, the petitioner states that they have depots/branches located in Chennai, Dindugal and Coimbatore f...
Petchimuthu Vs. The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Vir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., calling for the records relating to the order dated 16.6.2016, passed in Cr.M.P.No.5691 of 2016, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Rajapalayam and to set aside the same as illegal and entrust the custody of the tailer to the Petitioner and to allow the above revision as prayed for.) 1. The revision Petitioner aggrieved by the dismissal of his Property Return Petition in Cr.M.P.No.5691 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam, has directed this revision. 2. In connection with Crime No.193 of 2016 registered by the Thalavaipuram Police station, Virudhunagar District, as against one Sethu and five others, for having taken sand without permission, two trailers namely, TN 62 60 2606 and Sumt 160 Feb.2016 have been seized by the Police. 3. The revision petitioner filed Cr.M.P.No.5691 of 2016, stating that before TN 60 2606 could be registered, it was seized by the Police and pu...
Ashokkumar Vs. The Additional Director of Police Prisons and Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent made in No.2775/KiCi2/2012, dated 02.05.2013, and the impugned order of the 1st respondent made in No.43639/ES2/2013, dated 09.05.2013, and quash the same as illegal consequently, to direct the respondents to consider petitioner's claim for the post of Junior Assistant on compassionate ground in their department.) 1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed....
C. Gopal Vs. The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the relating to the impugned order bearing Na.Ka.No.2968/A5/2015, dated 03.09.2015, passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the 3rd respondent to revert the petitioner to the post of Primary School Headmaster in Guziliyamparai Block from the post of Middle School Headmaster forthwith.) 1. This writ petition is listed today under the caption for withdrawal on the basis of letter of requisition given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the Registry. 2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
M/s. Aqua Designs India Pvt., Ltd., Chennai Vs. Principal Commissioner ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the respondent, wherein the impugned order in Original Nos.114-120/2015-16, dated 31.03.2016, was issued and to quash the same.) 1. The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the activity of supply of various equipments relating to setting up of Water/Sewerage Treatment plants and other connected items and erection, commissioning and installation of the said plants. The petitioner would state that value of various equipments supplied by the petitioner forms the major part of the value of the works and erection, commissioning and installation of the same is an activity, which in certain cases, is outsourced by the petitioner to the contractors. This according to the petitioner are works contracts as defined under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) as well...
The Secretary, The Regional Transport Authority, Theni District and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the order, dated 30.10.2014, passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-104, in M.V. Appeal No.57 of 2013, and to quash the same.) Common Order: 1. Of these four Writ Petitions, W.P.MD. Nos. 19413 and 20130 of 2014 are filed by two Mini Bus Operators Mr.R.Gopinath and Mr.M.Rajendran, while W.P.MD. Nos.19243 and 19737 of 2014 are by the Secretary, The Regional Transport Authority (in short RTA ), Theni, and the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (in short TNSTC ), Dindigul, respectively. Inasmuch as all the above cases, questioning the legality of the Order, dated 30.10.2014, passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (in short Tribunal ), Chennai, revolve around common issues and points, they are taken up together for joint disposal with the consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2. The mai...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »