Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kesavan Vs. State, rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Avudaiyarkovil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.3264 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi and set aside the order, dated 20.06.2016.) 1. Murder is a serious offence. Sometimes, it will also become a heinous offence. It may be a relevant point while considering the bail plea. But, it may not be a relevant point while considering the return of property petition filed either by the owner or by the accused. 2. The revision petitioner is an accused in Crime No.141 of 2015, registered by Avudaiyarkovil Police, initially under Section 302 I.P.C., and subsequently altered to Sections 120-B, 342, 302 and 201 I.P.C. In the course of investigation, the Investigation Officer has seized Discover 125 Motorcycle (TN55 AY9211). It has become a case-property in this case. The accused is stated to be the vehicle owner. 3. The revision petitioner / accused sought for interim custody of the said vehicle by filing ...
George Ashok Vs. The State, through The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C., praying this Court to call for the entire records in the order passed by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti in Cr.M.P.No.5097 of 2014 in C.C.No.25 of 2013 in Crime No.816 of 2010 dated 2.3.2016 and to set aside the same and to order split up the case in C.C.No.25 of 2013 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti to conduct a separate trial for the Petitioner.) 1. A5 in C.C.No.25 of 2013, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, aggrieved by the dismissal of his petition in Cr.M.P.No.5097 of 2014 in C.C.No.25 of 2013 which has been filed to split up his case, has directed this revision. 2. This revision is directed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of Criminal Procedure Code. The Sessions Court as well as this Court exercised this revisional jurisdiction. This jurisdiction is different from the appellate jurisdiction. ...
M/s. Thillaikkarasi Sago Factory, Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records and to quash the complaint in C.C.No.37 of 2016 dated 27.10.2015 of the Judicial Magistrate Court- I, Salem.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the complaint in C.C.No.37 of 2016 dated 27.10.2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Salem. 2. On 07.10.2013, the Food Safety Officer, Salem, inspected the Sago Manufacturing Unit run by the petitioner in Salem and purchased one kilogram of sago for consideration. Thereafter, in the presence of the petitioner, the Food Safety Officer divided the one kilogram sample into four parts of 250 grams each. The Food Safety Officer suspected that the sago may be adulterated and may not satisfy the parameters laid down under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for short The Act ) and the Rules framed thereunder. The petitioner was given an option to send one sample to the National Accreditation...
Subramani and Another Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 18.11.2009 in S.C.No.236 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.IV, Chennai-1.) 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellants/A1 and A2 against the judgment dated 18.11.2009 in S.C.No.236 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.IV, Chennai-1, in and by which, each of them were convicted for the offence under Section 304 (Part-2) IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default, each to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. 2. The gist of the prosecution case leading to the conviction of the appellants/A1 and A2 is that the appellants were residing in III floor of Hindustan Tyre Shop situated in Whites Road, Chennai. The deceased Sambandam was a Night Watchman of that building. On 22.09.2008 at about 12.30 hours, when the decease...
T. Lalitha Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to release the JCB bearing Registration No.PY-01-AD-2578 which was seized by the Third Respondent without any valid authority on 18.07.2016 at 1.30 a.m. from Verkilambi and stationed in Third Respondent's office within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the Learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents. 2. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. According to the Petitioner, his father was doing transport business in the name and style of 'Jesus Lory Service ad Earth Movers' in Poovankodu, Kanyakumari District. His father was doing the said business for the past 20 years and supplying the goods in the entire Kanyakumari District. The petitioner also assist with his father's business. He is having many number of transport vehicles including the JCB vehicle, which ...
Mansur Ali Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Thiruvengadu Pol ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Nagapattinam, in S.C.No.128 of 2014 dated 31.08.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.128 of 2014 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila [Fast Track] Court, Nagapattinam. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 of IPC (Two Counts). The trial court, by judgement dated 31.08.2015, convicted the appellant for offence under Section 302 of IPC (Two counts) and sentenced him to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine Rs.1,000/- for each count in default to suffer simple imprisonment for a further period of one year. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the accused has come up with this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The appellant/accused is the husband of the deceased- Mrs.Rajalakshmi @ Bairejibanu. She w...
K.S. Murugesan Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.2,25,906/- towards Leave Salary together with 18% interest per annum and also interest amount towards the delayed payment of Gratuity amount Rs.3,40,053/- for the period from 01.03.11 to 24.04.12 as per Sec.7(3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay him interest amount towards the delayed payment of Pension Commutation amount Rs.2,10,346/- for the period from 01.03.2012 to 24.10.2013 at the rate of 18% interest per annum, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a...
A.T.S.V.S. Siddha Medical College and Hospital, Kanyakumari District a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent herein in respect of the conditional permission F.No.R-17013/04/2015-EP(IM-I), Government of India, Ministry of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH), Ayush Bhawan , B-Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi-110 023 dated 16.09.2015 issued by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, with the approval of the competent authority, along with the print out of Assessment Report for the year 2015-16 of the Central Council of Indian Medicine based on the Report of the Annual Visitation under Sec.13C/13A of the IMCC Act for the Academic Year 2015-16 in respect of the petitioner College, quash the same insofar as it relates to shortcomings mentioned therein in respect of the petitioner college on the ground it is contrary to MSR 2013, along with the direction to grant permission for ad...
N. Bhuvaneswari Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secret ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the third respondent in issuance of letter dated 12.07.2016 in No.2330/Tha.Ku.3/2016 and quash the same and thereby, direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave under Section 20(iv) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 for making arrangements, participating and solemnising marriage of our (sic) the petitioner's daughter Ms.Narthika.) 1. This writ petition is filed questioning the legality and validity of the letter dated 12.07.2016 in No.2330/Tha.Ku.3/2016 and for a direction to the respondents to grant ordinary leave to the petitioner's husband under Section 20(iv) of the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 (for brevity the Suspension of Sentence Rules ) for making arrangements, participating and solemnising marriage of the petitioner's daughter Ms. Narthika. 2. The incontrovertible facts in this case are as follo...
M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited, Vs. The Inc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Common Prayer: Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai, in No.27/Mds/2010 in I.T.A.No.460/Mds/2010, dated 09.06.2014; M.P.No.150/Mds/2014 in C.O.No.27/Mds/2010 in I.T.A. No.460/Mds/2010, dated17.11.2014;.P.No.148/Mds/2014 in I.T.A. No.1536/Mds/2010, dated 17.11.2014 and M.P.No.149/Mds/2014 I.T.A. No.1535/Mds/2010, dated 17.11.2014, respectively.) S .Manikumar, J. 1. Seven Tax Appeals, viz., TCA Nos.651 to 654 of 2016 and 453, 498 and 499 of 2016, have been filed challenging the orders, dated 09.06.2014, passed by the Tribunal, in I.T.A.No.1535/Mds/2009; I.T.A.No.1536/Mds/2009; I.T.A.No.460/Mds.2010; C.O.No.27/Mds/2010; 150/Mds/2014 in C.O.No.27/Mds/2010 in I.T.A.No.460/Mds/2010; 148/Mds/2014 in I.T.A.No.1536/Mds/2009; and M.P.No.149/Mds/2014 in I.T.A.No.1535/Mds/2009, respectively. 2. T.C.A.Nos.651 to 653 of 2016 have been admitted. 3. T.C.A.No.654 of 2016 is filed against the order...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »