Chennai Court August 2016 Judgments
K. Muruganand Vs. The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay Gratuity, Leave Salary and Pension Commutation with 18% interest per annum to the petitioner within a stipulated period.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advoca...
Tag this Judgment!V. Manoharan and Others Vs. The Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu Stat ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay Gratuity, Pension Commutation and Leave Salary with 18% interest per annum to the petitioner within a stipulated period.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advoca...
Tag this Judgment!A.S. Lakshmi Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Depart ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the first respondent i.e. the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai to pass appropriate orders on the petitioners representation dated 07.12.2015 regarding sanction of compounding interest for the belated payment of DCRG under Rule 45(A) of the Pension Rules for the period from 01.04.2007 to 10.06.2009 within a specified time frame that may be fixed by this court.) 1. The petitioner, aged about 67 years, seeks for a direction to the first respondent for passing appropriate orders on his representation, dated 07.12.2015, regarding sanction of certain retiral benefits. 2.Mr.Visvalingam, learned counsel, briefly narrating the case of the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner, while serving as Selection Grade Assistant in the Taluk Office, Tuticorin District, on reaching the age of superannuation, was allowed to retire from service on ...
Tag this Judgment!Chellakumar Vs. The Revenue Divisional Officer/Sub Collector, Kanyakum ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to cut and remove the overhanging trees causing aerial trespass to the petitioner property in Ry.No.619/18A of Karunkal Village, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District, within the stipulated time, as fixed by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed one behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 2. 4. According to the Petitioner, the Pentecostal Mission Church of Karunkal had purchased the land in R.S.No.619/18A, Karunkal Village, Vilavancode Taluk, admeasuring 52.5 Cents, by means of a registered Sale Deed, dated 07.07.1985. Latter, the compound wall of the Church was constructed in the year 1991 and also Church building was completed during the year 1993, after according sanction by the Authorities, following the requisite formalities. 5. It comes to be k...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Sivam Mines, Dindigul District and Others Vs. The District Regist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned Letter No.6809/Aa1/2015, dated 07.12.2015, issued by the 1st Respondent and the consequential order Na.Ka.No.21(A)/2015, dated 15.06.2016, issued by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to release the Document No.55/2015 pending on the file of the 2nd Respondent and to repay the sum of Rs.3,7770/- collected from the Petitioner for condoning the delay.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Industries (MMA.1) Department, vide G.O. (D)No.170, dated 03.11.2014, had transferred the Mining Lease from his individual name to the Petitioner / Firm. Pursuant to the aforesaid Government Order, the District Collector, Dindigul...
Tag this Judgment!Vedam Vs. Arulanandam @ Arul and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2008 made in A.S.No.19 of 2008 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2007 made in O.S.No.71 of 2006 on the file of District Munsif, Uthamapalayam.) 1. The defendant, who lost the legal battle before the Courts below has come forward with this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2008 made in A.S.No.19 of 2008 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2007 made in O.S.No.71 of 2006 on the file of District Munsif, Uthamapalayam. 2. The respondents, as plaintiffs, filed the suit for declaration, declaring that the portion of suit property marked as ABHG is a lane and for injunction restraining the defendant, her men and her agents from interfering the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land and also for mandatory injunction, to remove the iron sh...
Tag this Judgment!Samuel and Others Vs. State by Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thiru ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 11.03.2011 in S.C.No.324 of 2007 on the file of the VI Additional Sessions Court, in-charge of Mahila Court, Chennai.) This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 11.03.2011 in S.C.No.324 of 2007 on the file of the VI Additional Sessions Court, in-charge of Mahila Court, Chennai, convicting and sentencing the appellants/accused as tabulated hereunder: ad>Sl.No.Conviction under SectionSentenceFine1Section 498-A IPC on each of the accused personsone year rigorous imprisonment on each of the accused personsRs.5,000/- each, i/d each to undergo one month simple imprisonment2Section 306 read with 34 IPC on each of the accused personsfive years rigorous imprisonment on each of the accused personsRs.10,000/- each, i/d each to undergo one month simple imprisonment The trial Court ordered the sentences imposed on each of the accused persons to run concurrently. 2. The appellants / A1 to A4 are th...
Tag this Judgment!M. Raja Vs. The Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., (Madurai) ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay all the terminal benefits payable to the petitioner including Salary arrears in terms of settlement form 01.09.2013 to 31.05.2014 Gratuity Leave Salary in terms of the Settlement 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act dated 13.04.2015 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till the date of payment.)1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondent Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondent would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment pass...
Tag this Judgment!T. Balasubramanian and Others Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondents to pay the petitioner Rs.6,43,933/- towards Gratuity Rs.2,88,883/- towards Leave Salary and also arrears of wages for the period from 01.09.13 to 31.03.14 payable pursuant to new wage settlement dated 13.04.2015 together with 18% interest per annum and further directing the respondents to pay him Rs.2,67,001/- towards the pension Commutation amount and arrears of pension for the period from 01.04.14 by revising pension together with 18% interest per annum, after calculating all terminal/pension benefits based on the monthly wages payable to the petitioner on the months of his retirement i.e., March 2014 by revising the same as per the settlement dated 13.04.2015, as order by the Division Bench of this Court in its order dated 29.01.2016 in W.A(MD)No.1457 of 2015 and etc., batch. Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...
Tag this Judgment!V. Pandi Vs. The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pay the petitioner Rs.1,12,862/- towards Leave Salary together with 18% interest per annum and also interest amount towards the delayed payment of Gratuity amount Rs.4,04,991/- for the period from 01.02.12 to 30.12.13 as per Sec.7 (3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act and further directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay him interest amount towards the delayed payment of pension Commutation amount Rs.2,22,602/- for the period from 01.02.2012 to 24.10.2013 at the rate of 18% interest per annum, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »