Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.C. Sivakumar Vs. The Chairman, Vidya College of Engineering and Tech ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 1.9.2015 and to quash the same and further to direct the second respondent to allow the Petitioner's son namely T.C.S.Abiram to continue his fourth year I.T.Course in the second respondent/College.) 1. The learned counsel on record for the Petitioner Mr.C.Muthusaravanan submitted a letter, dated 20.6.2016 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said letter is placed on record. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. No costs....
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its District Collector, Dharmapu ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Second Appeal is preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree, dated 29.12.2005 made in A.S.No.34 of 2004 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dharmapuri, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 27.03.2001 made in O.S.No.458 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Harur.) 1. This Second Appeal is preferred against the concurrent findings of the Courts below, decreeing the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction. 2. The unsuccessful defendants are the appellants. For convenience, the parties are to be referred to in their original rank in the suit. 3. The suit land is Natham poramboke land. The predecessor of the plaintiff encroached the suit poramboke land 35 years back. The plaintiff purchased the suit land from her predecessor about 10 years back and put up construction after obtaining approval from the panchaytat. The second defendant has no right over the property. The second defendant, while removing encroachers from th...
Vilvanathan Vs. State by: Inspector of Police, Muthunagar Police Stati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 07.04.2014 in S.C.No.96 of 2012 on the file of the learned District Mahalir Sessions Judge, Cuddalore.) S. Nagamuthu.J 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.96 of 2012 on the file of the learned District Mahalir Sessions Judge, Cuddalore. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. By judgment dated 07.04.2014, the trial Court convicted the accused/appellant for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court, with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Jothi. Twelve years prior to the occurrence, she was given in marriage to one Mr.Srinivasan. Out of the said wedlock, a female child was born to ...
Tenmozhi Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable En ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.6001/2014/E1, dated 25.01.2016 and consequential order issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.2161/2014/A3, dated 6.6.2016 and to quash the same and consequently to forbear the respondents from evicting the Petitioner from the house bearing No.7-4/24 comprised in S.No.863, situated at Sixty Three Nayanmmar Madam South side, Uthamapalayam Post, Theni District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 to 3. 3. According to the Petitioner, her mother Kasturi Ammal served as a Sweeper in the Third Respondent/Temple. Her mother died few years back and now, the Petitioner is discharging the duties of a Sweeper in...
M/s. Kruv Spinners Pvt. Ltd. Rep. By its Managing Director P.K. Mahamu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Common Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the Return Endorsement order made by the learned District and Sessions Court at Theni on 02.06.2016 in Crl.M.P.Nos.unnumbered/ 2016 in Crl.M.P.No.72 and 73 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.1 and 2 of 2016 and to number the petitions and to pass orders on merits as to produce the sureties before the learned Fast Track Court (Judicial Magistrate Level), Theni in S.T.C.Nos.25 and 26 of 2016.) Common Order: These petitions have been filed, seeking a) to set aside the orders passed while returning the petition made by the learned District and Sessions Court at Theni on 02.06.2016 in Crl.M.P.Nos.unnumbered/ 2016 in Crl.M.P.No.72 and 73 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.1 and 2 of 2016; b) to direct the District Judge to number the petitions and to pass orders on merits with regard to production of sureties before the learned Fast Track Court (Judicial Magistrate Level), Theni in S.T.C.Nos.25 and 26 of 2016. Brief Facts: 2....
P.K.V. Panneer Vs. The Tahsildar, R.S. Mangalam, Ramanathapuram Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 28.03.2013 with regard to conduct the enquiry and to cancel the patta for the property in Survey No.84/1A2A, R.S.Mangalam Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 28.03.2013 with regard to conduct the enquiry and to cancel the patta for the property in Survey No.84/1A2A, R.S.Mangalam Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has entered into a registered mortgage dated 21.06.2000, for an amount of Rs.50,000/- in respect of the property situated in Survey No.84/...
I. Pushparani Vs. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagerc ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to issue ration card in the name of the petitioner and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to issue ration card in the name of the petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has married one Christy Ugin on 12.09.2003, and got two children. He further submits that the second respondent issued a family card containing the name of the petitioner's husband, herself and three children in the year 2005. The further case of the petitioner is that, due to harassment by her husband, she was compelled to live separately with effect from 05.05.2011, and that she had also obtained an order for maintenance in M.C.No.25 of 2012, against her husband under Section 125 of the Code of Crimi...
Murthi Vs. State by, The Inspector of Police, Nilgiris District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed u/s.374 Cr.P.C., against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Sessions (Fast Track) Court, Udhagamandalam, made in S.C.No.33 of 2012 dated 08.06.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.33 of 2012 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahalir Sessions (Fast Track) Court, Udhagamandalam. He stood charged for offence under Section 302 of IPC. By judgment dated 08.06.2015, the trial court convicted him under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: (a) The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Renuka. P.W.1 is the father of the deceased. The marriage between the deceased and the accused was celebrated 8 years b...
Mary Baby Vs. Maria Lawrence
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 (1) r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.493 of 2010 in M.C.No.5 of 1989 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel and set aside the order dated 22.01.2011.) 1. In this revision, an order under Section 127(3) Cr.P.C. has been challenged. 2. Initially, the revision petitioner sought for maintenance for herself and for her daughter, in M.C.No.5 of 1989, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, the learned Judicial Magistrate granted them each Rs.350/- p.m., Rs.150/- p.m. respectively. Subsequently, since the daughter became major, she did not enforce the maintenance order in her favour as it became unenforceable. 3. Revision petitioner sought for enhancement of her maintenance. On 18.03.2006, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, enhanced the maintenance from Rs.350/- to Rs.500/- per month. 4. The respondent filed I.D.O.P.No.54 of 2006...
Alfred Vs. State represented by the Inspector of Police, Murappanadu P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.4598 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaigundam, Thoothukudi District and set aside the order dated 06.05.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 06.05.2016 in Cr.M.P.No.4598 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaigundam, Thoothukudi District, by which the complaint of Arulmathi Yesuvadial / 2nd respondent herein was ordered to be forwarded to the Station House Officer concerned (under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.) to register a case, investigate the same and a report to be filed on or before 08.06.2016. 2. Based on the orders, a case was registered in Crime No.123 of 2016 under Sections 147, 294(b), 465, 468, 471, 420 and 506(ii) IPC. 3. Challenging the order passed by the learned Magistrate, directing the Police to register a case, the present petition in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8744 of 2016 has been fi...