Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manimegalai Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry and proceed in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), based on the complaint lodged by one Subramani, enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed on 16.04.2016. He has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Sathiapal Engineers (India) Limited and Another Vs. ---
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-01-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.) 1. These Company Petitions are preferred under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for sanctioning the scheme of arrangement (demerger) (in short 'the Scheme') between the Demerged company and the Resulting company with effect from 01st April 2015. The Scheme is appended as Annexure 'C' to the petitions. 2. M/s.Sathiapal Engineers (India) Limited, the petitioner in C.P.No.89 of 2016 is the Demerged Company and M/s.Sathiapal Constrictions Private Limited, the petitioner in C.P.No.90 of 2016 is the Resulting Company. 3. A perusal of the record shows that the respective petitioner companies have complied with the formalities as prescribed under the Companies Act and the Rules framed therein. The affidavits of the equity shareholders giving their consent to the scheme is appended as Annexure 'F' to these petitions. By order dated 23.02.2016 in C.A.Nos.166 and 16...
- ‹ Prev
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- Next ›