Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sakthivel @ Samuvel Vs. Selvi Rahana
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in M.C.No.32 of 2015 dated 12.08.2015 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli and to set aside the same.) 1. In this revision, the petitioner challenges monthly maintenance of Rs.4,000/- ordered by the learned Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli in M.C.No.32 of 2015 to his ex-wife/respondent. 2. As per Section 125 Cr.P.C. even a divorcee can claim maintenance. Accordingly, respondent has claimed maintenance. 3. According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the respondent voluntarily deserted him. The revision petitioner is suffering out of ailment. He is not in a position to go for any job. He has no financial capacity to pay maintenance. Further, what was granted is also more. 4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that the activities of the revision petitioner is such that she cannot spent even one minute with him. In the circumstanc...
S. Manikandan Vs. The Secretary to Government, Department of Finance ( ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in impugned proceedings in M.M.No.3748/15/F2 dated 04.01.2016 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reimburse the medical expenditure of Rs.1,27,542/- incurred by the petitioner and to pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in impugned proceedings in M.M.No.3748/15/F2 dated 04.01.2016 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reimburse the medical expenditure of Rs.1,27,542/- incurred by the petitioner. 2. It is the case of petitioner, that he is working as a Driver in Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation from the year 1997 and that he is a subscriber of Family Health Fund Scheme. It is the further c...
P. Muthuramalingam, Secretary, Thalaimalai Recreation Club, Virudhunag ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to interfere with the rights of the members of the petitioner's recreation club to play the indoor and outdoor games in the premises, namely, Thalamalai Recreation Club, situated at D.No.97/31-A, Mills Road, Rajapalayam Town, Virudhunagar District.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein not to interfere with the rights of the members of the petitioner's recreation club to play the indoor and outdoor games in the premises, namely, Thalamalai Recreation Club, situated at D.No.97/31-A, Mills Road, Rajapalayam Town, Virudhunagar District. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's club is registered under the Societies Registration Act having Regn.No.14 of 2016 on 08.02.2016 on the file of the Registrar of Societies, Virudhunagar. The petitioner...
Seema Vs. The District Collector, Nagercoil and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue Legal Heir Certificate to the Petitioner as the legal heirs of the deceased Ravikumar by considering the application of the Petitioner, dated 7.4.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, her husband was admitted in NIMS Hospital, Kerala State and she took all possible efforts to safe his life. But, it all ended in vein and finally, he expired on 18.10.2015, leaving behind her and his parents, as legal heirs. 4. The death of the Petitioner's husband was registered on 27.10.2015 bearing Registration No.690 of 2015 at Neyyattinkara Municipality. She applied on 7.4.2016 for the Legal Heirship Certificate before the Second Respondent/The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari D...
S. Karthikeya Balaji Vs. Lions Club International District and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order passed by the V Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 05.04.2016 in O.S.No.4656 of 2015 allowing the application filed under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.) 1. Challenging the fair and final order passed in I.A.No.685 of 2016 in O.S.No.4656 of 2015 on the file of the V Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.4656 of 2015 for declaration and permanent injunction. 3. In the said suit, the 3rd defendant filed an application in I.A.No.685 of 2016 under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to refer the parties to Arbitration in terms of the Arbitration Clause contained in Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution and By-laws of the Lions Club International. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, th...
Yuvaraj Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Gopichettipalayam Police ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.14 of 2013 on the file of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 392 of IPC. By judgment dated 30.04.2014, the trial court convicted him under both the charges and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 years for the offence under Section 392 of IPC and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 years for the offence under Section 302 of IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with his Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: (a) The deceased in this case was one Mrs.Shantha Mani. She was residing at Balaji Nagar, Gobichettiypalayam. The accused is the close relative of the deceased. P.W.2 is t...
Karuppan @ Karuppaiah Vs. The District Collector, Pudukkottai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbearing the respondents from giving permission to any person or group to perform a temple festival for Adaikalam Kaatha Ayyanar temple, Sri Veeramakaliamman temple, Sri Ponnadaselvi Temple and sri Minnal Kodial Temple or any other program in Keelakurichi village, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukkottai District till a solution is found by considering the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2014 and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
Berin @ Berin Deniyo Vs. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Inspector ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari district to expedite the hearing of C.C.No.110 of 2014 in the court of Judicial Magistrate Eraniel, Kanyakumari District and to dispose the same within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.) 1. It is an application seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari district to expedite the hearing of C.C.No.110 of 2014 within a time limit to be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3. A case has been registered against the petitioner under Sections 147, 148, 448, 427 and 506(ii) I.P.C and the same has been taken on file in C.C.No.110 of 2014. The case is pending for trial. 4. A perusal of Diary extract of the Court below would reveal that starting from 22.07.2014, followed by 30.12.2014, 17.06.2015, 1...
Mohammed Bashir Vs. Dr. Mahesh Menon and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District, in Cr.M.P.No.6920 of 2012 vide his order, dated 02.11.2012, and set aside the same and consequently direct the above said learned Magistrate to forward the petitioner's complaint to the Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Tirunelveli City under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., so as to register an F.I.R.) 1. As against the refusal of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, to forward his complaint, under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., the complainant has directed this revision. 2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner contended that taking the allegations as such in the complaint, as it discloses cognizable offences under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 and 506(1) I.P.C., the refusal of the learned Judicial Magistrate to forward the complaint is not in accordance with ...
Chinnasamy Vs. The District Collector, Dindigul and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide a drinking water tap connection to petitioner's house in S.No.831/2A, located opposite to V.A.O. Office, Naal Road, Eriyode Village, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, he seeking drinking water tap connection for his tiled house and sent very many representations from the year 2015 onwards. However, till date no action has been taken in the subject matter in issue. It is also represented on behalf of the petitioner that for the last legal notice issued on behalf of the petitioner on 23.04.2016 addressed to the Fourth Respondent, the Fourth Respondent/Executive Officer Eriyode Town Panchayat, Eriyode, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District had issued a reply stating that due to water scarcity, new water connection ...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »