Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Minor C. Nancy Uva Praba Rep. by her guardian and mother R. Arockiya M ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to admit the petitioner in BDS Course as per the allotment order made in favour of the petitioner by the 2nd respondent on 30.09.2014.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 21.06.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
S. Vijayaraghavan Vs. The Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.4462 of 2005 dated 28-07-2011.) A. Selvam, J. 1. Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order dated 28-07-2011 passed in W.P.No.4462 of 2005 by the learned Single Judge of this Court. 2. The appellant herein, as petitioner has filed I.D.No.664 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai praying to pass an award under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with regard to reinstatement of service. 3. The material averments made in the petition are as follows: The petitioner has joined as an Assistant in Accounts Department of the respondent on 09-07-1986. The petitioner has completed the period of probation satisfactorily and a confirmation order has been passed on 20-01-1987. The petitioner has discharged his duties honestly and sincerely. The respondent has used to give periodical increments to the petitioner. The petitioner has been promoted to the post of Senior ...
P. Shri Santhaji Vs. A. Rajagopal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petitions is filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the petition in Cr.M.P.No.4498 of 2015 in C.C.No.2 of 2009, dated 18.03.2016 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur and to set aside the same by allowing this revision.) 1. The accused in C.C.No.2 of 2009 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur having aggrieved by the dismissal of his recall petition filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in Cr.M.P.No.4498 of 2015 has directed this revision. 2. With regard to certain occurrence took place on 05.02.2008, in the Court Hall of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur, PW1, an Advocate filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the revision petitioner, alleging commission of an offence under Section 500 IPC. He has engaged PW2, an Advocate of Srivilliputhur Bar to prosecute the revision p...
Velan @ Velarasan Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Dharmapur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Appeals filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri, in S.C.No.118 of 2010 dated 28.11.2013.) S. Nagamuthu, J, 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.118 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Dharmapuri Division. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 201 r/w 302 of IPC. The trial court, by judgement dated 28.11.2013, convicted the accused under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. The trial court, however, acquitted the accused from the charge under Section 201 r/w 302 of IPC. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the accused has come up with this criminal appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:- The deceased in this case was one Mr.Chinnaramulu Naidu. He was a r...
Y. Arockiasamy Vs. The Post Mater General, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the amount deposited by the Petitioner as sought through his representation along with annexure dated 28.4.2016 to the Petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents. 3. It is the stand of the Petitioner that he had opened Savings Bank Account in S.B.A/c.Nos.283712 and 287276 in the Sub-Post Office, Sirunaickenpatti. His respective deposits in the above said accounts are Rs.70,147 and Rs.30,050/- respectively. Further, in the year 2015, the Sub-Post Master of Sirunaickenpatti Sub-Post Office namely, Sivaperumal had misappropriated the depositors amount which comes around Rs.9 lakhs approximately and nearly 83 accounts were misappropriated by the aforesaid individual. 4. The real grievance of the Petiti...
Vasanthamalar Vs. The District Registrar, Thanjavur District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 and 2. 3. According to the Petitioner, he submitted documents with a statement before the First Respondent/The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, K.M.S.Building, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District on 28.2.2016. It appears that the matter is still pending. At this stage, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner brings it to the notice of this Court that the Petitioner had entered appearance in connection with the enquiry before the First Respondent on 28.2.2016 and submitted necessary documents in the subject-matter in issue. Also, it is represented on behalf of the petitioner that notice was issued to the two persons concerned with this issue and the matter is pending at this stage. Hence, the Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the relief stated supra. 4. In view of the fact that the relief sought for ...
Saravanan Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Chithode Police Statio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.93 of 2012 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Erode. He stood charged for offences under Sections 302 and 506(ii) of IPC. By judgment dated 17.09.2012, the trial court convicted him under Sections 302 and 506(ii) of IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 2 years for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows: (a) The deceased in this case was one Mr.Pandy @ Ramasamy. The wife of the accused is one Mrs.Shanthi. They were all residing at Periya Semoor Village. The d...
Punitha Michael Kal Udaipor Sangam, Rep. by its President, G. Alexande ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Tender Notification in Na.Ka.No.03/Pu.Ma.Su/2016 dated 08.01.2016 on the file of the Respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction directing the Respondent No.1 to dispose of the appeal petition preferred by the petitioner dated 21.01.2016 within the time period stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. According to the petitioner/Society, it was formed for the welfare of labourers engaged in stone quarrying works and for their social upliftment. It was registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act from the year 2016. 3. The stand of the petitioner is that the second respondent had called for the tender for stone quarrying in the Government poromboke lands in Kanyakumari District on 22.11.2015 in accordance with Section 8(10-A(a)) of the Tamil Nadu ...
Madurai Central Market Vegetable and Perishable Commodities Merchant C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari by calling the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent in Ka.No.117/Ko.4/2016 dated 14.06.2016 and quash the same.) Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This writ petition is instituted calling in question the correctness of the proceedings dated 14th June 2016, passed by the Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Irrigation Section -II, Periyar Vaigai Basin Sub Division No.I, Madurai. By virtue of the proceedings, the petitioner has been directed to remove the encroachment within seven days, failing which, action would be taken against the petitioner and the encroachment would be removed at the cost of the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and Mr.Prasannavinoth, learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent. 3. It is urged before us that there w...
G. Lazer Nadar Vs. The District Collector, Tuticorin and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to issue a patta pass book in favour of the Petitioner to his property bearing S.No.110/20 situated at Maravanmadam Village, Tuticorin District measuring an extent of 4 cents on the basis of his representation, dated 28.4.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. To avoid an avoidable delay, notice to the Third Respondent is dispensed with. 3. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. No counter is filed on behalf of the Respondents 1 and 2. 4. According to the Petitioner, he is a bonafide purchaser of the property situated in S.No.110/20 situated at Maravanmadam Village, Tuticorin District measuring an extent of 4 cents. The case of the Petitioner is that he is not in possession of the patta for the property in question, till this day. Therefore, he had applied to the Respondents 1 and 2 through r...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »