Chennai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Arumugam Vs. Apurva Varma, I.A.S., State of Tamil Nadu, represented ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
1. Heard both sides. 2. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents 1 to 3 brings it to the notice of this Court that the Government had sanctioned a sum of Rs.3,15,700/- to the Petitioner/P.Arumugam, as recommended by the Committee, as compensation. Also, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 hands-over a cheque for Rs.3,15,700/- drawn in favour of the Petitioner, dated 16.06.2016 to the Petitioner's Learned Counsel Mr.V.Panneerselvam and the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has received the same in Open Court. 3. In view of the above, the Contempt Petition is closed, for the present, granting liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedy against the concerned persons/authorities, in the manner known to Law and in accordance with Law....
R. Karthi Vs. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to grant Parole for a period of 30 days to the petitioner's father, namely, B.Ravichandran S/o.Balu, who is a life convict, now confined in Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli to arrange money for the medical treatment of the petitioner's mother Gomathi, W/o.B.Ravichandran based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2016.) 1. The writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to grant Parole for a period of 30 days to the petitioner's father, namely, B.Ravichandran S/o.Balu, who is a life convict, now confined in Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli to arrange money for the medical treatment of the petitioner's mother Gomathi, W/o.B.Ravichandran based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2016. 2. Seeking such a relief, the petitioner has given a representation to the 1st respondent on 05.04.201...
M. Jeyaram Vs. The Senior Imigration Officer, Bureau of Immigration, C ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to return the Passport No. J4157158 issued on 12.10.2010 to the petitioner which was seized by the first respondent on 04.10.2012 within a time frame fixed by this Court and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to return the Passport No.J4157158 issued on 12.10.2010 to the petitioner, which was seized by the first respondent on 04.10.2012. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that several false cases were registered against him, since he is an active member and leader in Madurai District of a prominent political party. The petitioner submits that his passport was impounded/seized from the petitioner by the first respondent, on the ground that his name was figured in 'Look Out Circular' pursuant to the communication issued ...
C. Chellaiah and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to grant permission to conduct the temple festival at Arulmigu Sri Vinayaka Peruman Sri Murugan Sri Kaliamman Sri Mariamman Sri Manthai Muniyandi Temple festival Thiruvalluvar Nagar Nakaiyakottai Village Vedachanthur Taluk Dindigul District from 10.07.2016 to 12.07.2016 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2016. Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to not to grant permission for conducting Temple festival at Mariamman an Kaliamman Temple Thiruvalluvar Nagar Nagayankottai Village Vedasandur Taluk Dindigul District excluding the petitioners and their family members based on the representation of the petitioner dated 15.05.2016.) 1. The writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.10905 of 2016 has been filed for issuance of ...
K.C. Somasundaram and Others Vs. Dr.T.G. Prabhakar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the fair and decreetal order dated 25.2.2005 made in I.A.No.1267 of 2005 in O.S.No.6537 of 2004 on the file of XIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.) 1. Challenging the fair and final order passed in I.A.No.1267 of 2005 in O.S.No.6537 of 2004 on the file of XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the defendants have filed the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.6537 of 2004, under Order 37, Rule 1 of CPC, for recovery of a sum of Rs.4,83,750/- together with interest. 3. According to the plaintiff, the first defendant entered into a sale agreement with him for the purchase of the property and the plaintiff paid a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as advance. Further, it is the case of the plaintiff that the first defendant also received a further advance of Rs.1,00,000/- on the same day from him. According to the plaintiff, subsequently, on 3.12.2001, defend...
D. Prasanna Vs. The Registrar, Annamalai University, Chidambaram and O ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.06.2016, within a time frame fixed by this Court and to pass such further orders, which may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.) 1. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 05.06.2016, within a time frame. 3. The petitioner entered into service as Office Assistant in Examination Section, on a consolidated pay. Subsequently, his service was regularized. While so, on 04.03.2015, he was issued with a charge memo and he was placed under suspension from service. The grievance of the petitioner is that from the date of suspension onwards, he was not paid the subsistence allowance. In t...
R.S. Manoharanan Vs. The District Collector, Karur District, Karur and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide police protection to the customary function of seeking divine concurrence on 27.04.2014 at about 06.01. p.m from the Goddess Bagvathi Amman to fix the date for annual festival in the Arulmiu Bagavathi Amman located at Thelungapatty hamlet, Porunthalaur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.) 1. Since the petitioner seeks police protection to the customary function which was proposed on 24.02.2014, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs....
Naina Mohammed Sikkandar and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Ti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent police to give police protection to the petitioners' life and liberty and their business and further directing the 1st respondent to take necessary action against the 4threspondent.) 1. The writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent police to give police protection to the petitioners' life and liberty and their business and further directing the 1st respondent to take necessary action against the 4threspondent. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petitioner and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Selvambigai and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2014 passed in M.C.O.P.No.48 of 2005 by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (Subordinate Judge), Attur.) A. Selvam, J. 1. Challenge in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is to the Award dated 19th December, 2014 passed in M.C.O.P.No.48 of 2005 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Sub Court, Attur. 2. Respondents 1 to 3, as petitioners, have filed MCOP No.48 of 2005, wherein the present appellant and the fourth respondent have been arrayed as respondents. 3. It is averred in the petition that the first petitioner is the wife of deceased Umapathy. The petitioners 2 and 3 are their children. The deceased has joined as Police Constable in the year 1986. On 28.8.2003, the deceased has travelled as a pillion rider on a Motor Cycle bearing Registration No.TN 30 A 2134 so as to report his duty and the same has been driven by the first respondent. The first respondent has driven the ...
V. Subramanian Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charita ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-21-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.9377/2013 E1, dated 16.3.2016 and consequential order issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.4525/2013 A3 dated 6.6.2016 and to quash the same and consequently to forbear the respondents from evicting the Petitioner from the house bearing No.7-4/23-A comprised in S.No.863, situated at Muthukaruppanasamy Temple Street, Uthamapalayam Post, Theni District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the Petitioner, he is eking out his livelihood, by washing the temple clothes of Arulmighu Thirukkleswarar and Narasinga Perumal Temple, Uthamapalayam Post, Theni District, for the past fourty years. He is receiving a salary of Rs.3,000/-p.m from the T...