Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Sudalaikasi Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give permission and protection for conducting Minnozhi Kabadi Tournament conducted at K.M.C.Kabady Kulu at K.M.C. Thidal, Solaiseri Village, Veerakeralampludur Taluk, Tirunelveli Ditrict, scheduled to be held on 07.11.2015 to 08.11.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give permission and protection for conducting Minnozhi Kabadi Tournament conducted at K.M.C.Kabady Kulu at K.M.C. Thidal, Solaiseri Village, Veerakeralampludur Taluk, Tirunelveli Ditrict, scheduled to be held on 07.11.2015 to 08.11.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct the Kabadi tournamen...
S. Murugan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to remove the History Sheet in H.S.No.430/2012 maintaining by the Respondent No.3 against the petitioner under Tamilnadu Police Standing Order No.748 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2015 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the name of the petitioner in the History Sheet in H.S.No.430/2012 maintained by the third respondent against the petitioner under the Tamil Nadu Police Standing Order No.748, by considering his representation dated 09.07.2015. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner involved in a murder case. The brother of the petitioner namely one Muthukrishnan was murdered and hence a case was registered in Crime No.17 of 2010 on the file of the Thirupachethi Police Sta...
V. Kirubananthan Vs. T.V.S. Sivaperumal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order passed by the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District, dated 13.08.2015 passed in I.A.No.521 of 2015 in O.S.No.616 of 2009.) 1. The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.616 of 2009 on the file of District Munsif Court at Katpadi in Vellore District. The respondent herein is the plaintiff therein. 2. The respondent herein filed the suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the 'A' and 'B' schedule properties with the way right. 3. Thereafter, the respondent/plaintiff filed I.A.No.521 of 2015 in O.S.No.616 of 2009 for the following reliefs:- i) amendment of plaint; ii) to declare the plaintiff's right title, interest over the plaint 'C' schedule property and iii) for mandatory injunction against the defendant to demolish the wall, which is in S.No.57 in Senur Village to ...
Sun College of Engineering and Technology, Kanyakumari rep. by its Cha ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent, to call for the records relating to the case in S.T.C.No.256 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate -Fast Track Court (Magisterial level) No.1, Nagercoil, quash the same.) Common Order: The petitioner, who is an accused in S.T.C.No.256, 257, 255 of 2014 and S.T.C.No.26 of 2015 respectively on the file of the concerned Court, would submit that the respondent herein has filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, stating that the petitioner herein, in order to discharge his liability, issued a cheque, which, on presentation for encashment, was returned with an endorsement 'insufficient funds' in the following cases:-. S.NCrl.O.P(MD)No.ST.C.NoAmount BorrowedRs.Cheque No. and DateCheque ReturnedNotice Sent onNotice AcknowledgementCompliant date.123514/14256/142,00,00053272512.6.1412.08.1320.08.1309.09.13223625/142...
Seenivasan Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai District and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to register the First Information Report based on the complaint dated 30.12.2013 made by the petitioner and investigation the same in accordance with law.) 1. On 14.10.2015, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, hence the matter was ordered to be posted today i.e., on 16.10.2015 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution....
Sivaguru Vs. S. Rajeswari and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Revision is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. to call for the records and set aside the order passed in M.C.No.2 of 2014 on the file of Family Court, Tirunelveli, dated 08.07.2015.) 1. The wife and child aged 32 and 4 years respectively during the year 2014, have filed the application in M.C.No.2 of 2014 seeking maintenance at the rate of Rs.10,000/- each. 2. The facts in brief:- The marriage between the first petitioner and the respondent took place on 14.06.2009. The second petitioner was born on 21.06.2010 and thereafter, they lived in a joint family. The allegation against the husband is that he was maintaining relationship with one Shalini and knowing pretty well about the relationship and suppressing that fact, the first petitioner was married to the respondent. It appears that on acccount of that, there was a problem between the couples. 3. After delivery of the child, the respondent did not care to see the child and nobody seems to have participated in the naming...
The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: W.A.No.857 of 2015 is preferred under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 9.4.2015 passed in W.P. (MD) Nos.16935, 16986 and 17875 of 2014 and W.P. Nos. 33234 and 33235 of 2014.) Common Judgment: Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. The instant appeals arise from the common order dated 9.4.2015 passed in W.P.Nos.16935, 16986, 17875, 33234 and 33235 of 2014. Notwithstanding service of notice and also names printed in the cause list, none has chosen to appear, except the respondent in W.A. No.857 of 2015. 2. The writ petitioners filed the writ petitions separately, seeking to quash the G.O.Ms.No.534, Home (Courts II) Department dated 5th August, 2014, wherein by notification the State Government, exercising powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 22 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Central Act 34 of 2008) read with sub-section (1) of section 11 of the said Act, constituted a Special Court at Chennai (Poonamallee) for the trial of the following cases : ...
xxxxxxxxx (Name Withheld) Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for records relating to C.C.No.121 of 2012 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, and quash the same.) 1. CASTRATE CHILD ABUSERS Blood curdling, horrific, sadistic, terrifying, shocking, cruel and brutal gang rapes of toddlers in New Delhi, in October, 2015 would definitely justify this Court to suggest castration as an additional punishment for child abusers ?, especially, child rapists ?. This Court could foresee that the suggestion of castration would be surely condemned, censured and criticised as barbaric, punitive, draconian, cruel, retrograde, stone aged, cannibalistic, inhuman, etc. ?. Inspite of many penal laws and the recent POSCO Act, 2012 prescribing severe punishment for crimes against children, the number of such cases has increased from 38,172 in 2012 to 58,224 in 2013 and to 89,423 in 2014. When law is ineffective and incapable of addressing the menace, this Court cannot keep its hands fo...
Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Offi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. All these appeals are by the branch offices of one assessee, namely, The Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee has come up with the above appeals, raising the following substantial question of law: ” "Whether a co-operative society, carrying on banking business with the approval of the Reserve Bank of India, is liable to deduct tax under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the interest paid to its members?" 3. We are of the considered view that in addition to the above substantial question of law, one more substantial question of law also arises for consideration, namely, ''Whether there is any distinction between a co-operative bank and a co-operative society carrying on banking business and if so, under which category the appellant would fall?'' 4. Heard Mr.K.Ravi, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned senior standing counsel for t...
J. Albert Doss Vs. The Director of School Education, College Road, Che ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent DEO in Na.Ka.No.3667-AA4-2014 dated 25.11.2014 and the consequential proceedings issued by him in Na.Ka.No.3667/A4/2014 dated 26.03.2015, quash the same and further direct the 3rd respondent DEO to resume forthwith the disbursement of grant-in-aid towards the petitioner's salary and allowances from the month of November 2014 with all attendant benefits.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by J.Albert Doss challenging the impugned order dated 25.11.2014 and consequential proceedings dated 26.03.2015 passed by the 3rd respondent, the District Educational Officer, Trichy and for a further direction to the 3rd respondent to forthwith disburse the grant-in-aid towards his salary and allowances from the month of November 2014 with all attendant benefits. 2. Mr.Isaac Mohanlal, l...