Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Centre of Industrial Trade Union, Madurai Maanagar Sumaippani Thozhila ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent's impugned order dated 05.10.2015 and to set aside the same consequently direct the second respondent to give necessary permission and police protection to the petitioner's union to stage the demonstration on 09.10.2015 from 10.00 a.m to 12.30 noon, in front of the Tamil Nadu Labour Welfare Office, Ellis Nagar, Madurai, in support of their demand.) 1. Mr.N.Manoharan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the s...
Karuppiah Ambalam and Another Vs. Rukmani and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.11.2009 made in A.S.No.37 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Pudukkottai, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 20.02.2007 made in O.S.No.185 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.) 1. The above Second Appeal arises against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.37 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Pudukkottai, reversing the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.185 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi. 2. The appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents were the defendants in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.185 of 1997 to declare that the suit property is part of the Tank Vattakulam in Survey No.204/1 for irrigation source and consequently restrain the defendants 2 and 3 from cultivating the suit property or to put it for any other purpose so as to infringe the plaintiffs' right to use the irr...
P. Mathivanan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent No.2 to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.07.2015 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent No.2 to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 20.07.2015 and proceed with the same as per law within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 20.07.2015 a case was registered for the offences under Sections 294(b), 352, 355 and 506(i) IPC in Crime No.182 of 2015 dated 17.08.2015. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this petition is closed....
S. Baluchamy Vs. Manikandan, The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to issue notice to the Contemnor/Respondent and punish him under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.11738 of 2015 on 26.6.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition stating that he obtained an order dated 26.06.2015, wherein a direction was issued to the contemnor to complete the enquiry and register the case if any cognizable offence is made out within a period of four weeks. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order has been passed on 26.06.2015 and the petitioner sent a contempt notice on 19.07.2015, since he has not complied with the order. Hence, the petitioner has filed this petition stating that the respondent committed the disobedience of the order. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that after due enquiry the compl...
Marimuthu Mudaliar and Another Vs. Shenbaga Karayalar (Died) and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgments and decrees dated 08.07.1997 in A.S.Nos.77 and 47 of 1996 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi, confirming the judgments and decrees in O.S.Nos.295 and 294 of 1991, respectively dated 17.04.1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thenkasi.) Common Judgment 1. S.A(MD).No.1140 of 1999 arises against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.77 of 1996 on the file of Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.295 of 1991 on the file of District Munsif Court, Tenkasi. The plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.295 of 1991 for declaration, recovery of possession and for mesne profits. The defendants 1 and 3 are the appellants and the third respondent was brought on record as legal representative of the deceased first respondent. The second respondent is the second defendant in the suit. 2. S.A.No.1141 of 1999 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.47...
R. Madasamy @ Raja Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Tenkasi P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 21.12.2010 made in S.C.No.217 of 2010, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Tirunelveli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.217 of 2010, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Tirunelveli. There were three accused, who were arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 4. The Trial Court framed as many as seven charges against the accused, as detailed below. ChargeAccusedPenal Provisions11 to 4120(B) IPC21 to 4307 IPC31450 IPC41302 IPC52 to 4302 r/w 109 IPC61506(ii) IPC72 to 4506(ii) r/w 109 IPC By Judgment dated 21.12.2010, the Trial Court acquitted the accused Nos.2 to 4 from all the charges, but convicted the accused No.1, as detailed below:- Convicted under SectionsSentence imposedFine amount450 IPCTo undergo ten years rigorous imprisonmentRs.2,500/- in default to undergo six...
S. Sankarasubramanian Vs. S. Guhan and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.Nos.76 and 77 of 2015 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, dated 16.03.2015, on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tenkasi.) Common Order 1. Since both revisions are connected in factual matrix, they were heard together and are being disposed of together 2. These revisions arose out of I.A.Nos. 76 and 77 of 2015 in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tenkasi. This is a Will matter. It will give lot of controvercies. It has given controversies, because the genuineness of the Will is in issue, but this necessarily has to be set at rest by appreciation of evidence by the parties. 3. Originally, it started from a partition suit in O.S.No.31 of 1985. A preliminary decree was passed. Both sides and their mother Balammal were allotted shares. Final decree is yet to be passed. The matter went into rough weather, when Balamm...
R. Udhayasuriyan and Another Vs. Kennady, Inspector of Police, Theni D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to initiate appropriate Contempt Proceedings as against the contemnor herein for his wilful, wanton and flagrant violation of the order dated 20.10.2014 made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16061 of 2014 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
The General Manager, H.R. Department, Ariyalur Taluk and Another Vs. K ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 20.07.2015 made in I.A.No.95 of 2014 in O.S.No.135 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Ariyalur.) 1. The revision petitioners are the defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.135 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Ariyalur. The details of the suit are not relevant for the purpose of disposal of this Civil Revision Petition. 2. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff and the 2nd respondent herein is the 3rd defendant in the said suit. 3. While so, before the commencement of the trial, the 1st respondent herein filed an application in I.A.No.95 of 2014 in O.S.No.135 of 2012 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, seeking to amend the plaint. The said application was allowed by the Trial Court by an order dated 20.07.2015 and the present Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the aforesaid order. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners....
Velmayil Vs. State, rep by The Inspector of Police, Coutrallam Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-08-2015
(Prayer:Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 11.01.2012 made in S.C.No.78 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.III], Tirunelveli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.78 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.III], Tirunelveli. The second accused in the case was one Mr.S.Iyyappan, who is the son of the first accused. The Trial Court framed as many as two charges as detailed below. ChargeAccused Penal Provisions11302 IPC22302 r/w 109 IPC By Judgment dated 11.01.2012, the Trial Court has acquitted the second accused, but convicted the first accused, as detailed below:- Convicted under Sections Sentence imposedFine amount302 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for lifeRs.10,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. As against the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up w...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›