Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Jeyachandran Vs. The Superitendent of Police, Kanyakumari and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case upon the complaint of the petitioner dated 03.06.2014.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn....
M. Yoganandhan and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent police to register appropriate criminal case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.02.2014 and 24.02.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law and file a final report.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent police to register appropriate criminal case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.02.2014 and 24.02.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law and file a final report. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 24.02.2014, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, wou...
M/s. Saravana Global Energy Limited Vs. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Elect ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned notice of the second respondent Lr.No.SE/CEDC/Cud/DFC/AO/R/AS/RCS/A4/F Audit/11 dated 31.12.2011 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional.) 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It is carrying on business in manufacturing transmission and distribution of equipments relating to the power sector. It has been further stated that the property of the petitioner, at Vadalur, had been purchased by Padam Challani, in the auction proceedings, held on 9.7.2003, in O.A.No.355 of 2001. The auction had been conducted by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (I), Mumbai. The auction had been confirmed in the name of Padam Challani and a sale certificate had been issued to him. Thereafter, Padam ...
M/s. Asian Fabrix Private Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Vs. The P ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in VAT Cell/Roc.No.37188/2011/Circular No.22/2011 dated 20.10.2011, quash the same.) Common Order 1. Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are all taken up together and decided by a common order. 2. These Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in VAT Cell/Roc.No.37188/2011/Circular No.22/2011 dated 20.10.2011, quash the same. 3. The subject matter in all these Writ Petitions are related to payment of VAT on the invisible loss of yarn pursuant to manufacturing activity. The said issue has been decided by this Court in a batch of Writ Petitions in W.P.Nos.13901,30852 to 30880 of 2013 in the case of Interfit Techno Products Ltd....
Madurai Coats Public Servants Co-Operative Housing Society Limited, Re ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC to set aside the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.157/2005 dated 10.04.2006 on the file of I Additional Sub Court, Madurai confirming the decree and judgment of the District Munsif Court, Tirumangalam in O.S.No.386 of 1997, dated 20.10.2004. Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 27.04.2007 passed by the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam in E.P.No.24 of 2005 in O.S.No.386 of 1997.) Common Judgment 1. Second Appeal (MD).No.932 of 2007 arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.157 of 2005 on the file of I Additional Sub Court, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.386 of 1997 on the file of District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam. The third defendant in the said suit is the appellant. The first respondent was the plaintiff. The respondents 2 and 3 were defendants 1 and 2. The plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.386 of 1997 for spec...
S. Rhenius Vs. State rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Thenpagam Po ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to the proceedings in S.C.No.36/2014 pending on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Thoothukudi and quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the proceedings in S.C.No.36/2014 pending on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Thoothukudi and quash the same. 2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the perused the material available on records. 3. During the course of arguments the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he wants only early disposal of the case. 4. Considering the said submissions, the learned Principal Sessions Court, Thoothukudi, is directed to dispose the case in S.C.No.36 of 2014 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of. Cons...
V. Adaikkaladoss Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent, the Inspector of Police, Tamil University Police Station, Thanjavur to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 12.01.2015 in C.S.R.No.16 of 2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent, the Inspector of Police, Tamil University Police Station, Thanjavur to register the case on the basis of the complaint dated 12.01.2015 in C.S.R.No.16 of 2015. 2. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.01.2015, a case in Crime No.269 of 2015 was registered by the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 447, 294(b), 323, and 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code. 3. In view of the above stated position, the second respondent is directed to investigate the case in Crime No.269 of 2015 and file a final report ...
Covai Balu @ Bala Krishnan Vs. State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to withdraw the Criminal Appeal in C.A.No.31 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai and transfer the same to any other competent court in other districts of Tamil Nadu.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition to withdraw the Criminal Appeal in C.A.No.31 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sivagangai and transfer the same to any other competent court in other districts of Tamil Nadu, stating that the second respondent's/de-facto complainant's son is an Advocate against which he is unable to proceed the case in the said criminal appeal. Hence, he prays for transfer of the case. 2. Resisting the same, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the first respondent submitted that after the case in C.C.No.23 of 2012 being taken on file, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Siv...
A. Yaseen Mohammed Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Sup ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.04.2014.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint preferred by the petitioner dated 13.04.2014. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.04.2014 has not been received by the respondents police so far. 3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), the criminal original petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to give fresh complaint to the respondents if necessary....
G. Alexpandi @ Ajithpandi Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the repetition of the petitioner dated 11.08.2015 and to remove the petitioner's name from the History Sheet No.01/2012, dated 07.08.2012 maintained on the file of the 1st respondent under the light of the Judgment reported in 2010 Writ L.R.335 and in compliance with the Standing Instruction-57/2013 issued by the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu vide his proceedings, dated 29.11.2013, within a stipulated period.) 1. Mr.N.Manoharan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondents. By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the repe...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »