Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramachandran @ Splendor Ramachandran Vs. State rep. by Deputy Superint ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order in C.M.P.No.146 of 2015 in Spl.S.C.No.7 of 2015 passed by the learned Fast Track Mahila Court, Karur by allowing this direction petition.) 1. The petitioner who is a first accused has come forward with this petition challenging the impugned order passed in C.M.P.No.146 of 2015 in Special S.C.No.7 of 2015 dated 15.09.2015. The petitioner herein has filed C.M.P. to recall PWs 15 and 25 for further cross examination and to produce the Compact Disc in which the postmortem has been videographed but the Compact Disc was not produced and marked and the videographer was not examined during the trial. That factum was not considered by the trial court and dismissed the C.M.P.No.146 of 2015 against which the present petition has been filed. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that even though the postmortem has been videographed neither the videographer examined n...
Prema Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer:-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the respondents to produce the person or body of the petitioner's daughter Mahalakshmi, aged about 17 years before this Court and hand over the custody to the petitioner and pass such further or other orders.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. This is a case of a child victim. It is sad to note that the child in question bears a child now. The child - Mahalakshmi [hereinafter referred to as "the detenue"], was born on 16.05.1997. The petitioner herein is her mother. According to the petitioner, the third respondent had kidnapped the detenue from her lawful custody, on 28.09.2014. On a complaint made by the petitioner, the second respondent registered a case in Crime No.93 of 2014, under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. But, the child was not secured by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation. Apprehending danger to the life and modesty of the detenue...
S. Malathi Vs. Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, rep. by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 05.08.2015 in Ref. No.C.No.R2/315/2015 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequentially direct the respondent to re-conduct the physical eligibility test without star system.) Common Order 1. The petitioners/S.Malathi and R.Sathya have filed the writ petitions in W.P(MD)Nos.14325 and 14326 of 2015 respectively challenging the impugned order dated 05.08.2015 in Ref.C.No.r2/315/2015 passed by the 2nd respondent with a direction to the respondents to re-conduct the physical eligibility test without star system. 2. The petitioner/K.Tamilselvi has filed the writ petition in W.P(MD)No.15313 of 2015 challenging the impugned result dated 21.08.2015 published by the respondent with a direction to the respondent to re-conduct the physical eligibility test without star system. 3. The peti...
Robin Kishore and Another Vs. N. Manivannan, I.P.S., The Superintenden ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the contemnor/respondent for the willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.16875 of 2013 dated 11.02.2014.) Common Order 1. The petitioners have come forward with these Contempt Petitions stating that this Court by an order dated 11.02.2014 directed the respondents to execute the Non-bailable warrant issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial level) No.1, Nagercoil, in C.C.Nos.26 of 2012 and C.C.No.27 of 2012 dated 19.06.2012 . But, the contemnors have not shown any interest to execute the warrant and arrest the accused. Hence, the petitioner filed these contempt petitions. This court issued contempt notice on 30.07.2014. Even then the contemnors did not take any steps, and thereby, they have wilfulluy disobeyed the order of this Court. Hence, he prays for punishing the contemnors. 2. Today the second contemnor is ...
S.L. Dhason and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent police to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.05.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the second respondent police to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 15.05.2015. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 15.05.2015, but, however, the second respondent police had not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner in Current Paper No.DSP/DCB/544/15 dated 19.05.2015, the petition enquiry is closed and the closure report is also given to the petitioner. 4. Recording the submi...
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Workers Vs. Tamil Nadu Generation and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the letter of the second respondent in Letter No.089611/G44/G441/2010, dated 10.08.2011 and quash the same only in so far as it relates to in Paragraph No.2(iii) and 2(iv) of the order and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith regularize the services of the 79 members of the petitioner-Union within a stipulated period.) 1. The petitioner submits that he is the Circle Secretary of the petitioner Union and its Registration No. is 38/CPT. The petitioner Union is established for the protection of the rights of its members who are working in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The petitioner further submits that 162 members of the petitioner Union are working as contract labourers in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board for several years. Though the members of the petitioner Union and the petitioner made several representations reques...
Veluchamy Thevar and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelv ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 06.10.2015.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 06.10.2015. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a complaint to the second respondent as early as on 06.10.2015, but, however, the second respondent police has not taken any steps to register a case and hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.220 of 2015 is pending. He would further submi...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Chennai Vs. M. Vimala ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to set-aside the award and decree dated 03.10.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.1665 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Court of Small Causes, Chennai, slice down the quantum of award by a substantial margin.) The short facts of the case are as follows:- On 09.05.2009, at about 17.15 p.m. when the deceased was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No.TN-01-AH-7241, on the Stephenson Road, Chennai, the van bearing registration No.TN-02-J-0745, coming from the opposite direction and driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against him. As a result, he had sustained grievous injuries and succumbed to it. Hence, the parents of the deceased had levelled a claim petition against the owner and insurer of the offending vehicle and claimed compensation. 2. The Insurance Company had filed a counter statement and resisted the claim petition. The Insurance Company...
Arunkumar and Others Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the learned District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Dindigul to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits in relating to Crime No.257 of 2015 on the file of the respondents.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) IPC and Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act and Section 3(1) TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.257 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, move this petition seeking a direction to the learned District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Dindigul, to accept the surrender of the petitioners and consider their bail application on the same day on merits, in relating to Crime No.257 of 2015. 3. Perused the records. 4. The offences complained of, other than the offence under the Special enactment, may not be serious in nature warranting initial detenti...
C. Dhayabaran Chairman, Sun College of Engineering and Technology Vs. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to the case in S.T.C.No.260 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-Fast Track Court (Magistrate Level) No.I, Nagercoil and quash the same.) 1. The petitioner, who is an accused in S.T.C.No.260 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate -Fast Track Court No.1 (Magisterial level) Nagercoil, would submit that the respondent herein has filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, stating that the petitioner herein, in order to discharge his liability, issued a cheque, which, on presentation for encashment, was returned with an endorsement 'insufficient funds'. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has borrowed a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- on 10.05.2013 for the purpose of his College's improvement and the petitioner has also issued a cheque bearing No.532688 dat...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »