Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer:Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the third respondent to register a case/F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 28.09.2015 and investigate into the case.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, directing the third respondent to register a case/F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 28.09.2015 and investigate into the case. 2. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 28.09.2015, a case in Crime No.37 of 2015 was registered by the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code. 3. In view of the above stated position, the third respondent is directed to investigate the case in Crime No.37 of 2015 and file a final report in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 4. This Criminal Original Petition is di...
P. Suyambu and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Di ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent police to file the final report in Crime No.2 of 2013 on the file of the respondent within the time stipulated as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the second respondent police to file the final report in Crime No.2 of 2013 on the file of the respondent within the time stipulated as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.2 of 2013 on 06.01.2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 332, 427, 307 and 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 149 IPC. However, the second respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matte...
T. Arutselvar Anna and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivaga ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent herein not to harass the petitioner and his family members in any manner except due process of law.) 1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking a direction to the second respondent herein not to harass the petitioner and his family members in any manner except due process of law. 2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction submitted that there is no case and no F.I.R pending against the petitioner and hence, there is no harassment by the respondent police. 3. Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the second respondent is directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, but let the police investigate into the matter in accordance with law and the mandates as found set out in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610. If really, the police want to interrogate, it...
R. Chellayee Vs. Dharmarajan, Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur Dist ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act praying to issue contempt notice to the contemnors and punish them for their disobedience as well as violation of order dated 6.3.2015 passed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3064 of 2015 by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this Contempt Petition stating that the respondent willfully disobeyed the order of this Court dated 06.03.2015 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.3064 of 2015. 2. Today the contemnor is present before this Court and the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner is also present. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. 3. Recording the submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner this Contempt Petition is closed....
R. Jaya @ Jeyalakshmi and Another Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction, dated 07.04.2010, made in S.C.No.159 of 2006, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.) Common Judgment S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant - Mrs.R.Jaya @ Jeyalakshmi is the sole accused in S.C.No.159 of 2006, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. Final report was filed by the respondent against the two accused, including the appellant herein. The second accused, as per the final report, was one Mr.S.Prakash. The Trial Court framed charges against the both the accused under Sections 294(b), 324 [two counts] and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. After the evidence was fully recorded, the other accused - Mr.S.Prakash raised a plea that he was a juvenile in conflict with law as on the date of the occurrence. After holding necessary enquiry, the learned Sessions Judge found him a juvenile. Accordingly, the case ...
S. Ramakrishnan and Others Vs. The State, rep. by its Inspector of Pol ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the charge sheet in C.C.No.92 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Trichy in Crime No.25/2013 on the file of the All Women Police Station, Contonment, Trichy City and quash the same.) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement, made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Sparejon Samuel Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning and Anot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.270/2013/Na.Vu.Thi.Ku. Dated 14.03.2013 and the order made by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.15202/2013/DB3 dated 11.02.2014 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the respondents to approve the plan submitted by the petitioner for effecting construction in his land in Survey No.79, Block No.1, Ward G, Nagercoil by treating the reservation made for the widening the BB Scheme Road under the Nagercoil Detailed Development Plan No.III as lapsed in the light of Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (TN Act 35 of 1974).) 1. This is a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.270/2013/Na.Vu.Thi.Ku. Dated 14...
Samsul Huda Vs. Mahamada Beevi and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai dated 27.07.1998 made in A.S.No.12 of 1998 confirming the Judgment and decree of the Additional District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai dated 8.11.1997 made in O.S.No.598 of 1995.) 1. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to in accordance with their ranks in the original suit and in appropriate places, their ranks in the second appeal shall also be referred to. 2. The plaintiff in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. The suit was filed for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction. Contending that the site belonged to Therezhundur Perumal Temple and the same was taken on lease by the plaintiff's father Abdul Salam some thirty years prior to the filing of the suit, whereupon he put up a hut and started residing therein; that on 18.08.1991 under a deed of settlement, the father of the plaintiff gi...
State rep. by Inspector of Police Chennai Vs. Praansu Knits and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Cases against the order made in Crl.M.P.Nos.32,33 and 49 of 2008 in C.C.No.9 of 2007 dated 19-05-2008 on the file of the II Additional District Judge/Special Judge for CBI cases, Coimbatore.) 1. These criminal revision cases have been directed against the common order passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.32, 33 and 49 of 2008 in C.C.No.9 of 2007 by the II Additional District Judge/Special Judge for CBI cases, Coimbatore. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused along with her husband, fifth accused and one Gopaldas Lulla have submitted false and fabricated Foreign Bills Export (FBE) bills 22 to 24/2003 for a total sum of Rs.81,41,185/-(Rupees Eighty One lakhs forty one thousand one hundred and eighty five only) in the name of A4 firm and discounted the same by Canara Bank and credited the amount in the account of A4 firm, which has been misutilised by the petitioner and her husband. Out of this amount, a sum of Rs.4,20,000/- (Rupees Four lakhs twenty thousan...
The Correspondent/Principal Arokiamada Matriculation Higher Secondary ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
(Prayer:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 09.06.2009 in W.P. No. 604 of 2004.) Pushpa Sathyanarayana, J. The law without justice is like the grain bereft of its fibre. For it is justice which like the fibre of the grain provides the texture that nourishes and sustains. Constitutional interpretation must likewise nourish and sustain. 2. Private Schools on warpath. The reason is an erosion of the autonomy of private schools. In the development of nation, post-independence India is attributable to the efforts of private schools. The implementation of Right to Education Act itself has aroused widespread indignation within the community of private school promoters. Many of them have invested their life-savings into educational institution bench-marked with the best. 3. Educational institutions both schools and colleges are organized by the Government, local bodies like Municipalities and Zilla Parishads, as also by the private organizations. T...