Chennai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mittai @ Srinivasan Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tiruchi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the conviction and sentence, dated 07.02.2012, made in S.C.No.129 of 2011, by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruchirapalli Division, Tiruchirapalli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.129 of 2011 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Tiruchirapalli Division, Tiruchirapalli. He stood charged for the offence under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court, by judgment dated 07.02.2012, convicted him under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows; (a) The deceased in this case was one Chinnaponnu. She was working as a sanitary worker in the local Panchayat Board. PW1 is her husband. They were residing at Ambalakara Street, M...
M/s. Sree Krishna Alloys and Others Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: W.P.No.26056 of 2012: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the third respondent in Lr.No.SE/MEDC/DFC/AO/R/HT/AS/F.HT SC.110/R/12 dated 14.9.2012, and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.) Common Order The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had submitted that the writ petitions have become infructuous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1, 1 and 1 of 2012 are closed....
N. Ramu Vs. The State rep by the Inspector of Police, Trichy District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 30.01.2013 made in S.C.No.188 of 2012, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Trichy Division, Trichy District.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.188 of 2012, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Trichy District. He stood charged for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By Judgment dated 30.01.2013, the Trial Court has acquitted the appellant from the charge under Section 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code, but convicted him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. As against the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up with this Criminal Appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows:- The deceased, in this case, was ...
R. Periyasamy and Another Vs. M/s. Nawab Khairunnissa, Begum Sahiba En ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 22.07.2015 passed in I.A.No.4213 of 2015 in O.S.No.4833 of 2010 on the file of the learned First Assistant Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.) 1. The revision petitioners are defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.4833 of 2010 on the file of WAKF Tribunal at Chennai. 2. The first respondent herein filed the aforesaid suit in O.S.No.4833 of 2010 seeking the following reliefs before the WAKF Tribunal:- "i) directing the defendants 1 and 2 herein to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the suit property belonging to the plaintiff Wakf to the plaintiff within a period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. ii) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants herein, their men, agents or servants from putting up any superstructure or construction on the suit property viz., the land belonging to the Plaintiff Wakf without obtaining any tenancy right and permission t...
M.N. Ekasan Vs. State rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home (Priso ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in No.16149/tha.ku.2/2014 dated 29.10.2014 and quash the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.3 and further direct the Respondent No.3 to grant 90 days ordinary leave.) This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned order dated 29.10.2014 stating that the petitioner has filed an application for ordinary leave for 90 days under health ground and only the Additional Director General of Police and Home Secretary are the competent authorities to award ordinary leave, but the impugned order has been passed by the third respondent. Hence, he prays for setting aside the order. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from Pulmonary decease....
N. Palaniammal and Others Vs. D. Shanmugham, Executive Engineer, Tamil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Respondents herein for committing contempt of the order of this Court dated 10.06.2014 in W.P.No.14257 of 2014.) 1. The above Contempt Petition today came up before this Court when the respondent counsel informed to this Court stating that the respondent had conducted the enquiry and passed an impugned order on 24.08.2015 and a copy of the impugned order has been served on the writ petitioner. As such vide this Court's direction passed in W.P.No.14257 of 2014, dated 10.06.2014 has been duly complied with. The respondents have not committed any willful disobedience of this Court Order. Hence, the learned counsel entreats the Court to dismiss the above Contempt Petition. 2. The very Competent Counsel Miss.M.Poornima submits that the writ petitioners have received a copy of the impugned order. Further, she is not interested to proceed with the contempt petition. To that affect the highly competent ...
Muthiah Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayers: W.P(MD)No.18801 of 2015:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2015 and give proper police protection to the festival of Arulmigu Muthalamman Temple, Uthapuram Village, Usilampatty Taluk, Madurai District scheduled from 13.10.2015 to 22.10.2015 as decided by this court in the common order in W.PNos.10500, 10365, 10373, 10415 and 10583 of 2010 dated 20.03.2013. W.P(MD)No.19208 of 2015:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pertaining to order of the second respondent in Pa.Ve.No.500/2015/Aa2, dated 13.10.2015 and quash the same and direct to the respondent to give police protection of the remaining day of festival and not to disturb in any manner of celebration of Arulmigu Muthalamman Temple, Uthapuram Village, Usilampatty Taluk, Madurai Distric...
T. Veeravinothan Vs. The Managing Director, The Central Co-operative B ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to disburse the Earned Leave Encashment Benefits immediately, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 31.08.2015, within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner, who was working as a General Manager of the respondent, the Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Thanjavur, was dismissed from service, as per the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.846/02, dated 27.01.2010, challenging the same, the petitioner has filed W.P.(MD)No.2632 of 2010 unsuccessfully and the same was dismissed on 18.11.2010, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. Subsequently, the petitioner has filed a revision petition under Section 153 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. On 18.10.2013, the petitioner's Revision Petition was also disposed of by confirming the dismissal order. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the respon...
R.M. Thirumani and Another Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep by it ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot a shop for rent on lease at new commercial complex to be constructed at Bharathidasan colony road, K.K.Nagar, Chennai, in favour of the petitioner who is the erstwhile shop owner/tenant for many years in pursuance of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board as lessee.) 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the fourth respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, dated 27.7.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame specified by this Court. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for this court passing such an order. 3. In such circumstances, thi...
R. Velmurugan Vs. The Joint Director, Department of Stationary and Pri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-26-2015
(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in Eyak.Se.Mu.Aa.No.D2/19407/15, dated 06.10.2015 and consequently the order passed by the 2nd respondent by his proceedings in A1/2588/2015, dated 08.10.2015 and quash the same.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Mr.R.Velmurugan, challenging the impugned order of transfer, dated 06.08.2015. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner assailing the impugned order would submit that the impugned order of transfer has been passed against the petitioner by way of punishment, therefore, the same is against the service jurisprudence. 3. When the petitioner has approached the 2nd respondent seeking permission to open a portrait of Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, in order to honour the National leader, the 2nd respondent declined to grant permission. Therefore, the petitioner has made a c...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »