Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muthiah Vs. The District Collector, Madurai and Others

Muthiah vs The District Collector, Madurai and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Oct 26, 2015
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1179063

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P (MD) Nos. 18801 & 19208 of 2015 & M.P (MD) Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muthiah

Respondent

The District Collector, Madurai and Others

Excerpt

(prayers: w.p(md)no.18801 of 2015:writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of writ of mandamus, considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2015 and give proper police protection to the festival of arulmigu muthalamman temple, uthapuram village, usilampatty taluk, madurai district scheduled from 13.10.2015 to 22.10.2015 as decided by this court in the common order in w.pnos.10500, 10365, 10373, 10415 and 10583 of 2010 dated 20.03.2013. w.p(md)no.19208 of 2015:writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records in pertaining to order of the second respondent in pa.ve.no.500/2015/aa2, dated 13.10.2015 and quash the same and direct to the respondent to give police protection of the remaining day of festival and not to disturb in any manner of celebration of arulmigu muthalamman temple, uthapuram village, usilampatty taluk, madurai district.) 1. when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned additional government pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the function has already been over and the police protection is also given. 2. recording the submission of the learned counsel additional government pleader appearing for the respondents these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed. no costs.

Full Judgment

(Prayers: W.P(MD)No.18801 of 2015:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.10.2015 and give proper police protection to the festival of Arulmigu Muthalamman Temple, Uthapuram Village, Usilampatty Taluk, Madurai District scheduled from 13.10.2015 to 22.10.2015 as decided by this court in the common order in W.PNos.10500, 10365, 10373, 10415 and 10583 of 2010 dated 20.03.2013.

W.P(MD)No.19208 of 2015:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pertaining to order of the second respondent in Pa.Ve.No.500/2015/Aa2, dated 13.10.2015 and quash the same and direct to the respondent to give police protection of the remaining day of festival and not to disturb in any manner of celebration of Arulmigu Muthalamman Temple, Uthapuram Village, Usilampatty Taluk, Madurai District.)

1. When the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the function has already been over and the police protection is also given.

2. Recording the submission of the learned Counsel Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are dismissed. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial