Skip to content

Chennai Court June 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 09 2014

innovasia Media Solutions Vs. Tamil Nadu Road Development Company Limi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :09. 06-2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN W.P. No.13421 of 2014 and M.P. Nos. 3 and 4 of 2014 M/s. Innovasia Media Solutions Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr. A. Tamilselvam # 3/5A, 13th Avenue Harrington Road, Chetpet Chennai 600 031 .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Tamil Nadu Road Development Company Limited (TNRDC) rep. By its Managing Director No.171, II Floor Tamil Nadu Maritime Board Building South Kesavaperumalpuram Pasumpon Muthuramalingam Road (near Greenways Road MRTS Station) Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai 600 028 2. M/s. IT Expressway Limited rep. By its Chief General Manager II Floor, Sindhur Pantheon Plaza No.346, Pantheon Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008 .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent in its communication dated 05.05.2014 in W.P.S.R. No.35/TNRDC/ Writs/3035/2014, quas...


Jun 09 2014

Madras Race Club Vs. M.Victor

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:9. 6.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL O.S.A.No.385 of 2013 THE MADRAS RACE CLUB REP.BY ITS SECRETARY GUINDY, CHENNAI-32 .. Appellant vs. 1 M.VICTOR2M.GURU3V.SIVAN4E.RAJINI5A.ELUMALAI6V.MANOHARAN7K.VEERAN8M.PATTU9K.SHANMUGAM10R.KESAVAN11E.RAVI12M.PADMA13N.SELVAM14S.SHANTHA15K.ASAI16V.MANI17R.SUDHAR18V.JAYARAMAN19S.VENKATESH20M.CHELLAPPAN21R.PERUMAL22D.RAVI23M.RAJENDRAN24S.RAJAPETER25M.JESUDOSS26V.GIPSONRAJ27S.MAHENDRAN28P.PUNNIYAKOTI29G.M.MURUGAN30M.MURUGAN31V.VENKATESAN32G.MANI33J.MOHANRAJ34S.SHANMUGAM35M.SRINIVASAN36R.SRINIVASAN37SEKAR38N.SEKAR39G.K.RAJENDRAN40S.SAMUEL41K.THIRUNAVUKARASU42D.LOGANTHAN43M.JESUDOSS44V.KOTTI45R.SELVAM46M.MANI47D.MADHAN MOHAN48M.MURALI KRISHNAN49M.MARIDOSS50D.SUGUNA51M.KRISHNAN52N.RAJAN53S.SIVAPRAKASAM54R.A.ARUMUGAM55E.MANONMANI56E.VIJAYAKUMAR57E.JAGANNATHAN58E.GANESAN59M.NAGARAJAN60G.VADIVELU61S.JAYARAJ62E.KRISHNAN63B.P.VENGATESAN64G.PUNNIYAKOTTY65...


Jun 09 2014

Attavanai Ena Makkal Samuga Neethi Eyakkam Vs. Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :09. 06.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice B.RAJENDRAN W.P. No.11786 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 Attavanai Ena Makkal Samuga Neethi Eyakkam rep. by its President A.Ramamurthy ...Petitioner vs.1. The Secretary to Government Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi.2. The Secretary to Government The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, New Delhi.3. The Director, JIPMER Puducherry.4. The Chairman Medical Council of India Dwarakha Phase New Delhi. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in respect of Clause (vi) of the prospectus issued for admission to I year M.B.B.S., Course for the academic year 2014-15; to quash the same insofar as general condition of residence as provided in Clause (iv) (a) (b) of the prospectus is made applicable for admission to the Puducherry...


Jun 09 2014

G.Murugan Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM H.C.P.No.2634 OF2013G.Murugan ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai.2. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamilnadu, (Home), Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George,Chennai 600 009. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus to call for the records of the 1st respondent herein concerned in No.846/BDFGISSV/2013 dated 29.08.2013, setting aside the order of detention passed therein against the detenu by name, Murugan, aged 27 years, S/o.Gopal and to produce him before this Court and set him at liberty now detained in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.X.Selvam Sounder For Respondents : Mr.P.Govindarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Orde...


Jun 09 2014

K.Krishnan Vs. the Additional Registrar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Writ Appeal No.1173 of 2012 K.Krishnan ..Appellant vs 1.The Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 2.The Joint Registrar/Chairman, Common Cadre Committee, Salem District Primary Agricultural Co-operative Societies, Salem Region, Salem. 3.The Special Officer, Ramamoorthy Nagar Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society, Ramamoorthy Nagar Post, Omalur Taluk, Salem District..Respondents Prayer:- Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order, dated 11.11.2011, made in W.P.No.13346 of 2010. For Appellant :Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy For Respondents :Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2. Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar for R3 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.) The petitioner in W.P.No.13346 of 2010, is the appellant and he was dismi...


Jun 06 2014

G.Sarala Vs. the Home Secretary

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-06-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :06. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition No.19510 of 2003 G.Sarala .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort. St. George, Chennai.2. The Superintendent of Police, Vellore District, Vellore.3. The Inspector of Police, Gudiyatham Town Police Station, Gudiyatham. .. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- to the petitioner and her children. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Rajagopal For Respondents : Mr.Edwin Prabhakar, Government Advocate ORDER Alleging that the husband of the petitioner, taken to custody, was brutally beaten by some police constable, attached to Paratharami Police Station, Vellore District and later, died in the hospital, wife has filed this writ petition, for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.7,00,000/-.2. In the ...


Jun 06 2014

Sengeni Ammal Vs. Narasimhan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-06-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :06. 06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.(PD).No.788 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.7622 of 2004 Sengeni Ammal ... Petitioner Vs.1. Narasimhan 2.Narayanan 3.Sivakumar ... Respondents Prayer:- The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 24.02.2004 passed in I.A.No.2342 of 2003 in O.S.No.163 of 2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cudalore. For Petitioner : Mrs.Meenal for Mr.R.Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Baskaran ORDER The revision petitioner, who is plaintiff in the original suit in O.S.No.163 of 2003 filed this revision petition as against the order dated 24.02.2004 made in I.A.No.2342 of 2003 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Cudalore.2. For the sake of convenience, the plaintiff in the original suit is referred as revision petitioner and the defendants in the original suit are referred as respondents ...


Jun 06 2014

Mr.G.Balasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-06-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:06. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.1476 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.2 to 5 of 2011 Mr.G.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner versus 1.The State Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 2.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Officer, Unit III, Tamilnadu Housing Board, Nandanam Chennai 35. 3.The Executive Engineer cum Administrative Officer, Tamilnadu Housing Board, KK Nagar Division, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 83 .. Respondents PRAYER: This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents, relating to the impugned public notice dated 20.01.2011, published in the Daily Thanthi issued by the 3rd respondent inviting applications for the purchase of the proposed HIG Flats to be constructed by the respondents in Puliyur Village, Kodambakka...


Jun 06 2014

United India Insurance Vs. Govindaraj

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-06-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:06. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.1645 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 M/s.United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Dharapuram. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Govindaraj 2.K.Ganesan Respondents The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award & Decree dated 20.01.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.879 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge, FTC.V), Coimbatore at Thiruppur. For Appellant : Ms.K.Grahalakshmi for Ms.N.Mala JUDGMENT Ms.K.Grahalakshmi, learned counsel representing the counsel on record submitted that the quantum of compensation alone is the challenge in this appeal. Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.2. In the accident, which occurred on 04.06.2001, involving two motorcycles, bearing Regn.Nos.TN39J9856 and TN39 3048, insured with the appellant Insurance company, the respondent sustained a frac...


Jun 06 2014

V.C.Sunny Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-06-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :06. 06.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.(PD).No.1137 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 V.C.Sunny ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Vadapalani-II, Assessment Circle, Chennai-600 006.2. Cast lekote India Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.K.Swaminathan, ''Visaka'', No.28, Kannagi Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai-94.3. Mr.K.Swaminathan, Managing Director, Cast lekote India Ltd., ''Visaka'', No.28, Kannagi Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai-94. ... Respondents Prayer:- The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 28.03.2006 passed in I.A.No.3137 of 2006 in O.S.No.894 of 2004 on the file of the VIII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For 1st Respondent : Mr.T.T.Jayaramaraj, Govt.Advocate (C.S.) For Respondents 2 and 3 : No Appearance ORDER The revision petitioner, who is plaintiff in the...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial